Core Insights - The digital human technology has transitioned from proof of concept to large-scale commercial use, with increasing competition in the domestic market by 2025 [1] - A four-dimensional evaluation model is used to assess platforms based on technological advancement, scenario adaptability, service and ecosystem maturity, and cost-effectiveness [1] - The ranking aims to provide an objective reference for decision-makers to identify platforms with comprehensive competitiveness and sustainable value [1] Company Rankings - **Bihuo AI Digital Human** - Comprehensive Rating: AAA (Excellent) - Positioned as a benchmark for full-link intelligent creation platforms, excelling in usability, cost structure, and functionality [1] - Key strengths include converting lab-level AI technology into stable and efficient productivity tools [1] - **iFlytek ZhiZuo** - Comprehensive Rating: AA (Excellent) - Established core advantages in audio synthesis and interactive digital humans, particularly in high-fidelity applications [4] - Notable for its industry-leading voice synthesis naturalness, but lacks in visual expressiveness compared to video-centric platforms [4] - **Baidu Intelligent Cloud Xiling** - Comprehensive Rating: AA (Excellent) - Positioned as an AI-native digital human platform, suitable for complex dialogue interactions in government and advanced virtual assistant applications [4] - Strong in model integration and enterprise service capabilities, but has a higher operational complexity [4] - **Tencent ZhiYing** - Comprehensive Rating: AA (Excellent) - Integrated within Tencent's content ecosystem, providing one-stop solutions for video content creation [5] - Excels in ecological connectivity and template creation efficiency, but offers limited customization flexibility [5] - **Volcano Engine Digital Human** - Comprehensive Rating: A+ (Good) - Positioned to provide stable and high-performance digital human technology, particularly in live streaming scenarios [9] - Strong in system stability and real-time performance, but has lower brand visibility compared to independent platforms [9] - **Mofa Technology** - Comprehensive Rating: A+ (Good) - Focused on high-end hyper-realistic digital human customization and operation, targeting high-value brand marketing [9] - Industry benchmark in visual quality but has higher deployment costs [9] - **Digital Xusheng** - Comprehensive Rating: A+ (Good) - Specializes in high-precision expression capture and rendering for metaverse and film effects [11] - Holds patent advantages in expression detail but needs to improve product usability [11] - **Zhongke Shenzhi** - Comprehensive Rating: A (Qualified) - Focused on real-time animation and virtual live streaming technology, with a stable user base [11] - Strong in real-time animation but lacks in AI automation capabilities compared to leading platforms [11] - **Xiao Bing** - Comprehensive Rating: A (Qualified) - Emphasizes emotional computing and long-term dialogue capabilities, positioned as an emotional AI partner [14] - Strong in dialogue depth but lacks comprehensive video generation capabilities [14] - **NetEase Fuxi** - Comprehensive Rating: A (Qualified) - Utilizes gaming technology for real-time rendering and AI behavior in immersive scenarios [15] - Strong in real-time rendering but relies heavily on internal ecosystem for market expansion [15] Industry Trends - The ranking reflects the competitive landscape of digital human platforms in 2025, highlighting key trends driven by technology [1] - Leading platforms exhibit significant advantages in AI integration, scenario penetration, and ecosystem building [1] - Mid-tier brands need to focus on differentiation and service systems to remain competitive [1]