Group 1 - The market maker system is an important mechanism for injecting liquidity into the market, and the recent evaluation results for market makers in Q2 2025 show that Northeast Securities, Kaiyuan Securities, and Shanghai Securities ranked in the top 5%, receiving a waiver for all transaction handling fees for the quarter [1][2] - As of July 18, 63 brokerages have become market makers in the New Third Board, with Northeast Securities leading in the number of securities made market for, totaling 72, followed by Kaiyuan Securities with 66, and Shanghai Securities, Tianfeng Securities, and Changjiang Securities with 49, 43, and 42 respectively [1][2] Group 2 - The evaluation results indicate that several small and medium-sized brokerages are seizing opportunities in the New Third Board market, forming certain business advantages, while large brokerages like GF Securities and Shenwan Hongyuan have also shown improvement in their rankings [2] - The rapid development of market-making business has become an important growth point for brokerages, with many actively applying for various market-making qualifications [3] - Experts suggest that brokerages providing continuous two-sided quotes can meet investors' trading needs, enhance market pricing efficiency, and stabilize market fluctuations, contributing to a healthier market development [3]

Core Insights - The National Equities Exchange and Quotations (NEEQ) has released the market maker evaluation results for Q2 2025, highlighting the performance of various securities firms in the market-making business [1][2] Group 1: Market Maker Evaluation Results - In Q2 2025, three firms, Northeast Securities, Kaiyuan Securities, and Shanghai Securities, ranked in the top 5% and received a 100% fee exemption [1][2] - Six firms, including Haitong Securities and Shenwan Hongyuan, ranked between the top 10% and 20%, receiving a 50% fee exemption [2] - Notable changes in rankings include Guangfa Securities moving from the top 10% to the top 5% and Shenwan Hongyuan entering the top 10% to 20% for the first time [2] Group 2: Industry Trends and Insights - The competition among market makers appears to be less intense, with rankings showing relative stability and some fluctuations due to short-term business variations [3] - Smaller securities firms are gaining an advantage in the NEEQ market-making space, as larger firms focus on other areas [3] - Companies like Guoyuan Securities and Guosen Securities are actively enhancing their market-making capabilities to provide liquidity for small and medium enterprises [3][4] Group 3: Evaluation Criteria and Importance - The evaluation criteria for market makers include trading scale, liquidity provision, and quote quality, with a total score of 100 points [6] - The NEEQ emphasizes the significance of the market maker system in improving market liquidity and facilitating price discovery [6] - Continuous assessment and optimization of the evaluation mechanism are planned to promote the healthy development of the market maker system [6]

Core Viewpoint - The evaluation results for market makers in the second quarter of 2025 have been released by the National Equities Exchange and Quotations (NEEQ), highlighting the performance and fee exemptions of various securities firms [1][4]. Group 1: Market Maker Rankings and Fee Exemptions - Northeast Securities, Kaiyuan Securities, and Shanghai Securities ranked in the top 5%, receiving a 100% exemption on transaction fees [2][4]. - In the top 20%, firms like GF Securities and Shenwan Hongyuan saw improvements in their rankings compared to the first quarter of this year [2][5]. - A total of 12 market makers qualified for transaction fee exemptions, with 6 firms in the 10%-20% ranking receiving a 50% exemption [4][5]. Group 2: Market Dynamics and Competitive Landscape - The rankings of market makers show limited volatility over several quarters, indicating a stable competitive landscape, although individual rankings may fluctuate due to short-term business variations [6]. - The list of ranked firms primarily includes smaller securities companies, suggesting a differentiation in competitive strategies, as larger firms tend to dominate in other areas and invest less in the New Third Board market-making business [7]. Group 3: Business Strategies and Market Positioning - Guoyuan Securities emphasized a return to core business principles in its market-making activities, aiming to enhance trading capabilities [8]. - First Capital Securities is adjusting its portfolio based on market conditions to provide liquidity for quality New Third Board companies [8]. - Caida Securities reported a modest involvement in market-making, with a small proportion of its trading assets allocated to this business [8]. Group 4: Evaluation System and Future Directions - The NEEQ's market maker evaluation system, revised multiple times, assesses firms based on various criteria, including market-making scale, liquidity provision, and quote quality [9]. - The NEEQ aims to continuously evaluate the effectiveness of this system to enhance market liquidity and promote a healthy market-making environment [9].