Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the emergence of "intelligent agents" as a significant commercial anchor and the next generation of human-computer interaction, highlighting the shift from "I say AI responds" to "I say AI does" [1] Group 1: Current State and Industry Perspectives - The concept of intelligent agents is currently the hottest topic in the market, with various definitions leading to confusion [3] - A survey indicates that 67.4% of respondents consider the safety and compliance issues of intelligent agents "very important," with an average score of 4.48 out of 5 [9] - The majority of respondents believe that the industry has not adequately addressed safety compliance, with 48.8% stating that there is some awareness but insufficient investment [9] Group 2: Key Challenges and Concerns - The complexity and novelty of risks associated with intelligent agents are seen as the biggest challenges in governance, with 62.8% of respondents agreeing [11] - The most concerning safety compliance issues identified are AI hallucinations and erroneous decisions (72%) and data leaks (72%) [14] - The industry is particularly worried about user data leaks (81.4%) and unauthorized operations leading to business losses (53.49%) [16] Group 3: Collaboration and Security Risks - The interaction of multiple intelligent agents raises new security risks, necessitating specialized security mechanisms [22] - The industry is working on security solutions for intelligent agent collaboration, such as the ASL (Agent Security Link) technology [22] Group 4: Data Responsibility and Transparency - The responsibility for data handling in intelligent agents is often placed on developers, with platforms maintaining a neutral stance [35] - There is a lack of clarity regarding data flow and responsibility, leading to potential blind spots in user data protection [34] - Many developers are unaware of their legal responsibilities regarding user data, which complicates compliance efforts [36]

Core Insights - The year 2025 is referred to as the "Year of Intelligent Agents," marking a paradigm shift in AI development from "I say AI responds" to "I say AI acts" [1] - The report titled "Intelligent Agent Health Check Report - Safety Panorama Scan" aims to assess whether safety and compliance are ready amidst the rapid development of intelligent agents [1] - The core capabilities of intelligent agents, namely autonomy and actionability, are identified as potential risk areas [1] Dimension of Fault Tolerance and Autonomy - The report establishes a model based on two dimensions: fault tolerance and autonomy, which are considered core competitive indicators for the future development of intelligent agents [2] - Fault tolerance is crucial in high-stakes fields like healthcare, where errors can have severe consequences, while low-stakes fields like creative writing allow for more flexibility [2] - Autonomy measures the ability of intelligent agents to make decisions and execute actions without human intervention, with higher autonomy leading to increased efficiency but also greater risks [2] Industry Perspectives on Safety and Compliance - A survey revealed that 67.4% of respondents consider safety and compliance issues "very important," with an average score of 4.48 out of 5 [4] - There is no consensus on whether the industry is adequately addressing safety and compliance, with 48.8% believing there is some attention but insufficient investment [4] - The top three urgent issues identified are stability and quality of task execution (67.4%), exploration of application scenarios (60.5%), and enhancement of foundational model capabilities (51.2%) [5] Concerns Over AI Risks - The most common safety and compliance concerns include AI hallucinations and erroneous decisions (72%) and data leaks (72%) [6] - The industry is particularly worried about user data leaks (81.4%) and unauthorized operations leading to business losses (53.49%) [6] Responsibility and Data Management - The responsibility for data management in intelligent agents is often unclear, with user agreements typically placing the burden on developers [14][15] - Many developers lack awareness of their legal responsibilities regarding user data, which complicates compliance efforts [15] - The report highlights the need for clearer frameworks and standards to ensure responsible data handling and compliance within the intelligent agent ecosystem [15]