某报最佳分析师评选

Search documents
新财富最佳分析师评选法律行动进展公告
新财富· 2025-09-22 09:20
Core Viewpoint - Shenzhen New Fortune Multimedia Co., Ltd. has filed a lawsuit against Shenzhen New Fortune Magazine Co., Ltd. and its affiliates due to serious impacts on its legal rights caused by various actions during the "Best Analyst" selection process [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Allegations - The company has identified several actions that negatively affect its legal rights, including the illegal acquisition and use of its data, such as voter names, phone numbers, and email addresses for the "Best Analyst" selection [2]. - Unauthorized use of proprietary award names like "Platinum Analyst," "Diamond Analyst," and "Double Diamond Analyst," along with the use of the company's historical award records as a basis for their selection [2]. - Misleading promotional language that causes confusion in the market, leading the public to mistakenly associate the "Best Analyst" selection with the company's own awards [2]. - Direct copying of the company's rules and historical data in award settings, industry classifications, and leaderboard designs, resulting in a highly similar format to the company's "Best Analyst" selection [2]. Group 2: Protection of Commercial Secrets - The case involves the theft and use of the company's commercial secrets, including voter names, phone numbers, and email addresses, which have been used in the "Best Analyst" selection [3]. - The judicial authorities will review whether the actions constitute criminal offenses and will advance the corresponding investigations [3]. Group 3: Commitment to Industry Standards - The company remains committed to fairness, impartiality, and professionalism, aiming to protect industry order and promote the healthy development of capital market research [4]. Group 4: Relevant Legal Provisions - Relevant legal provisions include the Trademark Law, which prohibits the unauthorized use of similar trademarks that could cause confusion [6]. - The Anti-Unfair Competition Law, which prohibits acts of confusion and infringement of commercial secrets [6]. - The Civil Code, which protects intellectual property rights and holds infringers accountable [6]. - The Criminal Law, which may classify serious violations of commercial secrets as a crime if proven [6].