中新社北京2月27日电 (记者 刘亮)中国国务院新闻办新闻发言人周建设27日在北京透露，2025年国务院 各部门共采纳代表委员所提意见建议4900余条，出台相关政策措施2200余项。 国务院新闻办公室当天举行国务院政策例行吹风会，介绍2025年国务院部门办理全国人大代表建议和全 国政协提案工作有关情况。 周建设在会上表示，2025年，国务院各部门共承办全国人大代表建议8754件，全国政协提案4868件，分 别占建议、提案总数的95.6%、97.3%，均已按时办结，代表委员对办理工作表示满意。 据介绍，各部门出台的相关政策措施，在优化国家发展战略布局、助力现代化产业体系建设、推动更大 力度稳投资促消费、加力解决民生领域痛点难点问题等方面取得新成效。 科技部秘书长潘晓东在会上介绍，该部门推动银行信贷更大力度支持科技创新，截至2025年底，科技型 中小企业贷款余额3.63万亿元人民币，同比增长19.8%。 谈及提振消费有关措施，商务部副部长鄢东称，2025年，商务部结合办理相关建议提案，把促消费和惠 民生结合起来，推进实施提振消费专项行动，持续释放消费潜力。消费对经济增长的贡献率达52%，比 上年提高5个百分点。 ...

下一步，区市场监督管理局将把餐饮领域不正当竞争整治常态化、长效化，持续深化普法宣传教育，不 断加大巡查排查力度，引导商户诚信经营、公平竞争，切实维护餐饮市场良好秩序，为市民营造安心、 放心的消费环境。(完) 本次专项整治以辖区热门景区、核心商圈周边餐饮经营主体为重点检查对象，靶向排查四类突出不正当 竞争行为：一是"原料造假"，严查用廉价肉冒充高档肉等以次充好行为；二是"资质造假"，整治伪 造"有机""绿色食品"认证标识；三是"功效造假"，规范夸大菜品养生保健作用的误导性宣传；四是"好 评造假"，打击虚构消费评价、刷分造势等干扰消费选择的行为。执法人员坚持"整治+普法"双轮驱动， 在严格检查的同时，深入解读《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法》，明确经营主体违法责任与诚信义 务，引导餐饮企业主动落实主体责任、规范经营行为。 中新网黑龙江新闻2月26日电(吴昌林)近日，哈市香坊区市场监督管理局聚焦餐饮领域"内卷式"恶性竞 争乱象，精准发力开展不正当竞争专项整治行动，重点打击各类虚假宣传违法违规行为，切实维护餐饮 市场公平竞争秩序，守护消费者"舌尖上的诚信"。 ...

（抖音） 人民法院最终判决：郑州麦X丰食品有限公司立即停止侵犯涉案注册商标专用权及不正当竞争行为，赔偿许昌市胖东 来商贸集团有限公司、许昌市胖东来实业公司经济损失300万元及维权合理开支5万元；广州市增城XX零食店赔偿上 述两公司经济损失2000元。 近日，胖东来商贸集团法务部发布关于"黄金万两大月饼"商标权及不正当竞争纠纷一案判决书公示。 当中显示，胖东来"大月饼"自2022年8月上市以来，受到广大消费者的喜爱。2024年以来，市面上出现由郑州麦X丰食 品有限公司委托生产、宣传、销售的"黄金万两大月饼"，该产品通过以广州市增城XX零食店为代表的多平台带货主播 宣传、销售，大量使用"胖东来"相关标识、字样，导致消费者混淆误认。胖东来发现该侵权行为后，立即进行取证， 固定相关证据，并依法提起诉讼进行维权。人民法院经过一审、二审，认定郑州麦X丰食品有限公司委托带货主播推 广销售"黄金万两大月饼"时，在相关宣传中使用"胖东来"字样的行为构成商标性使用，导致消费者混淆，侵犯了胖东 来注册商标专用权；同时，其借用"胖东来"品牌知名度进行引人误解的商业宣传，违反《反不正当竞争法》相关规 定，构成不正当竞争。广州市增城XX ...

安市监处罚〔2026〕21号 浏览：2次 处罚机关 处罚依据 《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法（2019修正）》 / 第二十条 / 第一款 变更： 文本信息：该行政处罚决定未上传处罚文书。 安福县市场监督管理局 处罚日期 2026年02月11日 处罚种类 法律、法规规定的其他行政处罚方式#罚款 基本信息： ...

Core Viewpoint - The National Market Supervision Administration emphasizes the need for fair competition and plans to conduct reviews and investigations to rectify policies that hinder a unified market and fair competition by 2025 [1] Group 1: Fair Competition Measures - A fair competition review will be organized in 2025 to address policies that obstruct market unity and fair competition [1] - The administration aims to investigate and rectify various policies that may lead to monopolistic practices, particularly in the pharmaceutical sector [1] Group 2: Antitrust Actions - The agency plans to address a series of monopolistic cases in the pharmaceutical industry, which is expected to lead to significant price reductions for involved drugs [1] - A total of 14,600 cases of unfair competition will be investigated and handled [1] Group 3: Market Regulation - There will be a comprehensive effort to mitigate "involution-style" competition, focusing on cost investigations, price checks, and guidance for key enterprises [1] - The initiative aims to effectively cool down "price wars" and "subsidy wars" in the market [1]

经济观察网 在国务院新闻办公室今天（5日）举行的新闻发布会上，市场监管总局介绍，2025年，组织 开展公平竞争审查抽查，敦促有关政策制定机关对妨碍统一市场和公平竞争的政策措施进行整改；查处 医药领域系列垄断案件，推动涉案药品大幅降价；查办各类反不正当竞争案件1.46万件。综合整治"内 卷式"竞争，加强对重点企业的成本调查、价格检查、约谈指导，有效推动"价格战""补贴战"及时降 温。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company is expected to report an adjusted net loss of 13.2 billion yuan in Q4 2025, with a revenue growth of 4% year-on-year to 91.9 billion yuan, resulting in an adjusted net loss margin of 14% [1] Group 1: Q4 2025 Performance Expectations - The company anticipates a core local business operating loss of 11.5 billion yuan, with an operating profit margin (OPM) of -17.8%, aligning with previous expectations [1] - In the food delivery segment, competition intensity has decreased during the off-season, with expected order volume growth slowing to 13% year-on-year; despite a reduction in average user expenditure loss compared to Q3 2025, it is still projected to exceed 2 yuan [1] - The flash purchase segment is expected to see a strong year-on-year order volume growth of 30%, with average losses per order less than 1 yuan, resulting in an OPM of -19.5% [1] - The in-store travel and accommodation segment is projected to maintain stable growth in gross transaction value (GTV) and revenue, but OPM is expected to decline to 25.6% due to competition from Douyin [1] Group 2: Competitive Landscape and Future Outlook - Entering 2026, competition uncertainty remains, particularly in the food delivery sector, where focus is shifting towards high-ticket markets and non-food retail; the company aims to strengthen consumer recognition of its user experience advantages [2] - Regulatory interventions against unfair competition are expected to curb irrational competitive behaviors in the industry, with a need to monitor the pace and specifics of these regulations [2] - Competitors are enhancing their agent capabilities and integrating into various life scenarios, with AI potentially becoming a variable affecting competition [2] - In the in-store travel and accommodation sector, competition is currently more rational compared to 2023, but attention is needed on Douyin's potential expansion into more verticals and Alibaba's increased investment in the in-store domain [2] Group 3: Profit Forecast and Valuation - The company maintains its adjusted net profit forecast for 2025 at -16.8 billion yuan, while lowering the 2026 forecast from 19.6 billion yuan to -9.7 billion yuan, and reducing the 2027 forecast by 34% to 29.9 billion yuan [2] - The company is rated to outperform the industry, with a target price of 125 HKD, corresponding to a 23x adjusted P/E for 2027E and a 28% upside potential; the current price corresponds to an 18x adjusted P/E for 2027E [2]

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Procuratorate emphasizes the need to utilize legal power to support high-quality development and maintain economic and financial security [1] - Strict punishment for serious economic crimes, including smuggling of strategic minerals, is mandated to protect national strategic interests [1] - Collaboration with financial regulatory authorities to combat illegal financial activities, including illegal fundraising and financial fraud, is highlighted to ensure stable financial operations and protect public property [1] Group 2 - Focus on strengthening domestic circulation and building a robust domestic market while ensuring equal legal protection for various business entities [2] - Emphasis on judicial protection of intellectual property rights, particularly in emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and data [2] - The need for enhanced supervision and correction of prominent issues in enterprise-related law enforcement is stressed to promote a fair business environment [2]

每逢热门演出开票，"一票难求"已成常态，而"机刷"行为更加剧了票务资源的紧张，扰乱市场秩序，侵 害普通消费者公平购票权益。日前，大麦诉郑某某销售抢票软件不正当竞争案在入选"最高人民法院 2024年人民法院知识产权典型案例"后，又成功获选"2025年度中国十大文娱法事例"。作为全国首例明 确认定销售抢票软件构成不正当竞争的判例，此案为整治"机刷"乱象提供了司法支撑，切实维护了演出 票务市场秩序与消费者合法权益。 据了解，2023年，郑某某通过其运营的"全职程序员软件开发工程师"网店，销售一款针对大麦APP的抢 票外挂软件。该软件借助技术手段模拟并循环发送购票请求，帮助用户绕过大麦平台"先到先得"的购票 规则，以此提升抢票成功率。大麦随即提起诉讼，主张该行为妨碍了大麦APP的正常运营，损害了平台 的合法权益，破坏了公平的购票秩序，已构成不正当竞争，请求法院判令郑某某赔偿经济损失及合理开 支。 2024年12月30日，北京市东城区人民法院针对此案作出一审判决。法院认定，郑某某为大麦用户提供抢 票服务，利用大麦的经营活动和用户群体作为自身资源牟利，属于市场竞争行为。该行为增加了大麦的 运营成本，干扰了平台的经营决策， ...

Core Viewpoint - The case of Damai suing Zheng for selling ticket-snatching software has been recognized as a significant legal precedent in combating unfair competition in the ticketing market, aiming to protect consumer rights and maintain market order [1][2]. Group 1: Case Background - In 2023, Zheng sold a ticket-snatching software targeting the Damai APP, which used technical means to bypass the platform's "first-come, first-served" ticket purchasing rules, increasing the success rate of ticket acquisition [1]. - Damai filed a lawsuit claiming that Zheng's actions disrupted the normal operation of the Damai APP and violated fair ticket purchasing practices, constituting unfair competition [1]. Group 2: Court Ruling - On December 30, 2024, the Beijing Dongcheng District People's Court ruled that Zheng's actions constituted unfair competition as they exploited Damai's user base for profit, increased operational costs, and infringed on consumer rights [2]. - The court ordered Zheng to compensate Damai for economic losses and reasonable expenses, with the ruling taking effect on January 24, 2025 [2]. Group 3: Implications and Future Outlook - The case sets a precedent by integrating platform competition interests, consumer rights, and public interest into the review process under the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, providing a model for its application in the ticketing sector [2]. - Following the case, Damai intercepted over 6 billion malicious ticket-snatching requests in 2025 and assisted law enforcement in cracking down on black market operations, indicating a commitment to maintaining fair ticketing practices [2].