检索增强生成(RAG)
Search documents
DeepMind爆火论文:向量嵌入模型存在数学上限,Scaling laws放缓实锤?
机器之心· 2025-09-02 03:44
Core Viewpoint - The recent paper on the limitations of vector embeddings has gained significant attention, highlighting the theoretical constraints of embedding models in information retrieval tasks [1][2]. Group 1: Understanding Vector Embeddings - Vector embeddings transform complex entities like text, images, or sounds into multi-dimensional coordinates, allowing for efficient data comparison and retrieval [2][4]. - Historically, embeddings have been primarily used for retrieval tasks, but their application has expanded to reasoning, instruction following, and programming due to advancements in large model technologies [4][5]. Group 2: Theoretical Limitations - Previous research has indicated that vector embeddings inherently lose information when compressing complex concepts into fixed-length vectors, leading to theoretical limitations [4][6]. - DeepMind's recent study suggests that there is a mathematical lower bound on the capabilities of vector embeddings, indicating that certain combinations of relevant documents cannot be retrieved simultaneously beyond a critical document count [6][7]. Group 3: Practical Implications - The limitations of embedding models are particularly evident in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, where the inability to recall all necessary information can lead to incomplete or incorrect outputs from large models [9][10]. - The researchers established a dataset named LIMIT to empirically demonstrate these theoretical constraints, showing that even state-of-the-art models struggle with simple tasks when the number of documents exceeds a certain threshold [10][12]. Group 4: Experimental Findings - The study revealed that for any given embedding dimension, there exists a critical point where the number of documents surpasses the model's capacity to accurately capture all combinations, leading to performance degradation [10][26]. - In experiments, even advanced embedding models failed to achieve satisfactory recall rates, with some models struggling to reach 20% recall at 100 documents in the full LIMIT dataset [34][39]. Group 5: Dataset and Methodology - The LIMIT dataset was constructed using 50,000 documents and 1,000 queries, focusing on the difficulty of representing all top-k combinations [30][34]. - The researchers tested various state-of-the-art embedding models, revealing significant performance drops under different query relevance patterns, particularly in dense settings [39][40].
独家洞察 | RAG如何提升人工智能准确性
慧甚FactSet· 2025-06-10 05:12
Core Viewpoint - The accuracy of data is crucial for financial services companies utilizing Generative AI (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLM), as inaccurate or low-quality data can adversely affect company strategy, operations, risk management, and compliance [1][3]. Group 1: Causes of Data Inaccuracy - Data inaccuracy in the financial services sector often arises from multiple factors, including the increasing volume and variety of data sourced from multiple vendors, patents, and third-party sources [4]. - "Hallucination" is a significant challenge in the financial sector regarding Generative AI, where models generate coherent but factually incorrect or misleading information due to their reliance on learned patterns from training data without factual verification [4]. Group 2: Importance of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) - RAG is a critical technology for improving the accuracy of Generative AI and significantly reducing hallucinations by integrating real data with generated responses [6]. - RAG combines the generative capabilities of LLMs with effective data retrieval systems, allowing for more accurate and contextually relevant answers, especially in financial risk assessments [6]. - RAG enhances the utilization of various data formats, enabling the processing of both structured and unstructured data efficiently, and connects existing legacy systems without the need for costly migrations or retraining of LLMs [7]. Group 3: Benefits of RAG - RAG helps address the main causes of data inaccuracy discussed earlier, providing more accurate answers based on proprietary data and reducing hallucinations [8]. - It allows for the integration of the latest knowledge and user permission management, ensuring that responses are based on up-to-date information [8].