Core Viewpoint - The increasing use of security devices with camera functions, such as electronic cat eyes and electronic door locks, has raised privacy concerns among neighbors, highlighting the tension between safety and privacy rights [1]. Group 1: Case Background - A resident in Shanghai, Ms. Zhao, expressed discomfort after her neighbor, Mr. Zhang, installed an electronic cat eye that captured footage of her family's daily activities [2]. - Mr. Zhang installed the device to prevent package theft, believing it would only record when someone approached at a low angle [2]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The relationship between the neighbors deteriorated as both parties held firm to their positions, leading to a court case initiated by Ms. Zhao to have the device removed [3]. - During the court session, the judge emphasized the importance of balancing safety and privacy rights, referencing the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China [4]. Group 3: Resolution - The judge facilitated a resolution by inspecting the camera's coverage area and addressing additional issues, such as the placement of shoe cabinets in shared spaces [4]. - Ultimately, both parties agreed to remove the electronic cat eye and reorganize their shoe cabinets to avoid occupying public space, leading to a reconciliation [4].

Core Viewpoint - The rise of electronic security devices, such as video doorbells, has led to privacy concerns and conflicts among neighbors, prompting legal intervention to resolve disputes [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A resident, Ms. Zhao, expressed discomfort after her neighbor, Mr. Zhang, installed a video doorbell that captured footage of her family's movements, leading her to seek legal action for its removal [2][3]. - Mr. Zhang installed the device to prevent package theft, believing it would only capture footage under specific conditions, but did not consider the privacy implications for Ms. Zhao [2][3]. Group 2: Legal Mediation - To address the dispute, a judge from the Shanghai Changning District People's Court conducted a community-based mediation session, emphasizing the balance between safety and privacy rights as outlined in the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China [4]. - The judge facilitated a site visit to assess the camera's coverage and identified additional underlying issues, such as the placement of shoe cabinets in shared spaces, which contributed to the conflict [4]. Group 3: Resolution - The mediation resulted in Mr. Zhang agreeing to remove the video doorbell, while Ms. Zhao acknowledged his intentions for home security, leading to a mutual understanding [4]. - Both parties reached an agreement to reorganize their shoe cabinets to avoid occupying public space, effectively resolving both the overt and covert conflicts [4].