初一那年的一个夜晚，我在学校晚读过后暴雨倾盆，校门口的积水漫过脚踝，同学们陆续被家长 接走，我缩在校门口的屋檐下，望着雨幕发愁。正沮丧时，矿灯熟悉的昏黄光晕穿透雨帘，父亲 举 着 它 一 步 一 步 趟 着 水 走 来 ， 裤 脚 早 已 湿 透 。 他 二 话 不 说 ， 脱 下 外 套 裹 住 我 ， 将 矿 灯 塞 进 我 怀 里，随即背起我往家走。 一路上，矿灯的光晕在雨夜里明明灭灭，父亲的脚步却很稳，溅起的水花打湿他的后背，我伏在 他背上，听着他急促的喘息声，突然发现他的肩膀不再像以前那般宽阔，却依然是我最坚实的依 靠。那盏矿灯，不仅照亮了回家的路，更照亮了我心底的温暖与安心。 后来搬家，放在角落里的矿灯逐渐蒙尘，渐渐消失在我们的视野。直到我工作后有次回家，握着 外甥的小手教他拧亮一盏轻便的LED台灯，指尖忽然出现那陈旧的粗砺旋钮触感，于是翻箱倒柜 重新找出老矿灯，用软布擦拭干净，重新充满电，关上房间的灯光，重新将它点亮。 老矿灯曾在黑暗里燃起的温和光束忽然再次照亮心间。它曾是父亲在千尺井下开凿的微小星辰， 也曾降格为我手中一件拙重玩具，变作抚慰的火种，变作泥径上虫鸣夜捕的引路明灯，更化作暴 雨夜中 ...

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the illegal excavation of ancient cultural sites and tombs, leading to significant legal consequences for the perpetrators involved in the crime [1][4]. Group 1: Discovery and Initial Actions - The criminal activities began when an individual discovered suspicious holes in a cornfield while fishing, leading to a plan to excavate for valuable artifacts [2]. - The group, led by Wang, organized a team to excavate the site, purchasing tools like the Luoyang shovel and probe to facilitate their illegal activities [3]. Group 2: Criminal Activities and Network Formation - The group initially found low-value artifacts but continued to excavate in various locations, ultimately forming a network for the illegal trade of stolen cultural relics [3]. - Despite multiple excavations, the group only profited approximately 20,000 yuan, contrasting sharply with the irreversible damage caused to cultural heritage sites [3]. Group 3: Evidence Collection and Legal Proceedings - The investigation involved comprehensive evidence collection, including on-site inspections and the use of drones to map the locations of the excavated sites [4]. - The case was complicated by the number of excavations and the covert nature of the activities, necessitating further investigation to solidify the evidence chain [5]. Group 4: Judicial Outcomes - The court sentenced the main perpetrator, Wang, to a significant prison term, while others received varying sentences based on their roles in the crime [1][7]. - The legal proceedings emphasized the importance of accountability for the destruction of cultural heritage, with the court ensuring that penalties were proportionate to the crimes committed [6][7].