Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the proliferation of counterfeit smart appliances that falsely claim compatibility with the Xiaomi ecosystem, particularly focusing on a desktop fan that does not meet the advertised specifications and quality standards [1][4][10]. Group 1: Product Quality and Consumer Experience - The desktop fan purchased by the consumer had inaccurate battery level indicators and only 4-5 adjustable wind speeds instead of the advertised 100 [4][5]. - Many similar products are marketed under different brands but share the same specifications and features, leading to consumer confusion and increased selection costs [5][8]. - The lack of transparency regarding core components, especially batteries, raises safety concerns, as these products often do not undergo rigorous safety testing [8][10]. Group 2: Market Dynamics and Brand Perception - The Xiaomi ecosystem's open interface allows third-party products to easily integrate, which has led to an influx of low-quality "small workshop" brands that exploit the Xiaomi brand's reputation [18][21]. - Some counterfeit products use misleading marketing tactics to create the illusion of being Xiaomi-certified, which can mislead consumers into purchasing inferior products [10][15]. - The article suggests that while the open ecosystem can enhance user engagement, it also necessitates better regulation and transparency from manufacturers to protect consumers [23][24]. Group 3: Consumer Recommendations - Consumers are advised to be cautious and prioritize products with clear specifications and brand identification, rather than being swayed by vague marketing claims [24]. - The article emphasizes that even if a product does not support ecosystem integration, quality and safety should remain the primary considerations when making a purchase [24].