Core Points - The lawsuit initiated by MiHoYo against Tencent is primarily to obtain user data related to a civil case, highlighting the legal process for data retrieval in privacy matters [1][4] - Tencent's response emphasizes its compliance with privacy laws, stating that it cannot provide user data without a formal judicial request [1][4] - The case is linked to MiHoYo's efforts to combat leaks of unreleased game content, as indicated by previous actions against individuals sharing confidential information [2][7] Group 1: Legal Context - MiHoYo's lawsuit is a common legal strategy to access user data from platforms when pursuing claims against individuals for privacy violations [1][5] - Tencent's refusal to provide user information without judicial authorization is a protective measure under the Cybersecurity Law and Personal Information Protection Law of China [4][7] - The legal framework requires platforms to safeguard user data and only disclose it under specific circumstances, such as user consent or legal mandates [4][7] Group 2: Evidence and Investigation - MiHoYo may have identified some leakers but requires Tencent's data to uncover additional anonymous individuals involved in the leaks [7][8] - The lawsuit allows MiHoYo to formally request evidence, including chat logs and file transfer records, which could substantiate claims of intellectual property infringement [5][8] - The ability to access detailed records from Tencent could provide critical evidence for MiHoYo's case, including the identity of leakers and the specifics of the leaked content [7][8]