Workflow
经典老剧
icon
Search documents
【世相百态】AI魔改经典老剧 切莫触碰侵权雷区
Zheng Quan Shi Bao· 2025-09-19 01:03
Core Viewpoint - The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has led to a surge in AI-generated content (AIGC), which raises concerns about the boundaries of "fair use" and "infringement" in the context of classic works being modified for entertainment purposes [1][2]. Group 1: AI Technology and Content Modification - AI technology has enabled diverse forms of artistic reconstruction, including film adaptations and music covers, but this has blurred the lines between creative innovation and copyright infringement [1][2]. - The modification of classic works using AI can alter the original creators' intended meanings and themes, potentially disrespecting the original material and its cultural significance [1][2]. Group 2: Legal Implications and Copyright Issues - The copyright of classic works has not expired, and unauthorized modifications using AI may infringe on the original creators' rights [2]. - The use of actors' likenesses in parody videos can also violate their portrait rights, leading to further legal complications [2]. Group 3: Responsibilities of Creators and Platforms - Creators and platforms must respect the rights of original creators and seek proper authorization for AI-generated adaptations to ensure compliance with copyright laws [2][3]. - There is a need for creators to maintain the integrity of the original works and avoid excessive reinterpretation that could damage the original's reputation and the performers' images [2][3]. Group 4: Accountability for Infringement - If infringement occurs, video publishers may face liability, and platforms that fail to fulfill their review obligations could also be held accountable for the consequences of such actions [3].
【世相百态】 AI魔改经典老剧 切莫触碰侵权雷区
Zheng Quan Shi Bao· 2025-09-18 21:52
Core Viewpoint - The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has led to a surge in AI-generated content (AIGC), which raises concerns about the boundaries of "fair use" and "infringement" in the context of classic works being modified for entertainment purposes [1][2]. Group 1: AI Technology and Content Modification - AI technology has enabled diverse forms of artistic reconstruction, including adaptations of classic dramas, but this has also resulted in a proliferation of low-quality, vulgar content that distorts the original works' essence [1][2]. - The modification of classic dramas using AI can lead to significant changes in the original creators' intended messages, potentially violating the spirit of the original works [1][2]. Group 2: Legal Implications and Copyright Issues - The copyright of classic dramas has not expired, and unauthorized modifications using AI may infringe on the original creators' rights [2]. - The use of actors' likenesses in parody videos can also infringe on their portrait rights, highlighting the legal complexities surrounding AI-generated content [2]. Group 3: Responsibilities of Creators and Platforms - Creators and platforms must respect original creators' rights and seek proper authorization for AI modifications to ensure compliance with copyright laws [2][3]. - There is a need for creators to adhere to ethical boundaries in their adaptations, avoiding excessive distortion of original narratives and characters, which could harm the reputation of the original works [2][3]. Group 4: Accountability for Infringement - If infringement occurs, video publishers may face liability, and platforms that fail to fulfill their review obligations could also share responsibility for the consequences of such actions [3].
【世相百态】AI魔改经典老剧切莫触碰侵权雷区
Zheng Quan Shi Bao· 2025-09-18 18:03
Core Viewpoint - The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has led to a surge in AI-generated content (AIGC), which raises concerns about the boundaries of "fair use" and "infringement" in the context of classic works of art and culture [1][2]. Group 1: AI Technology and Content Creation - AI technology has enabled diverse forms of artistic reconstruction, including film adaptations, AI singer covers, and style imitation in painting, expanding creative boundaries [1]. - The phenomenon of AI modification, particularly of classic works, often prioritizes sensationalism over respect for the original content, potentially distorting the original creators' intentions and undermining the essence of the original works [1][2]. Group 2: Intellectual Property Concerns - The use of AI for modifying classic works without the original creators' permission may constitute copyright infringement, especially since the copyrights of many classic works have not expired [2]. - AI-generated content that distorts the portrayal of actors or characters may infringe on the rights of the individuals involved, raising significant legal issues [2]. Group 3: Legal and Ethical Responsibilities - Creators and platforms must respect the rights of original creators and seek proper authorization to ensure that AI modifications comply with copyright laws [2][3]. - The responsibility for any infringement lies with the video publishers, while platforms that fail to fulfill their review obligations may also face liability for the consequences of such infringements [3].