Core Viewpoint - BlackRock, the world's largest asset management company, is navigating complex financial and political landscapes, balancing its investment strategies in China while facing scrutiny and opposition from various U.S. states regarding its ESG policies [3][12][20]. Group 1: BlackRock's Financial Maneuvers - In early 2025, BlackRock made headlines by defaulting on a loan for two office buildings in Shanghai, despite having a substantial asset management scale of $11.6 trillion by the end of 2024 [3]. - BlackRock's net profit for 2024 was approximately $6.4 billion, indicating that the default was not due to a lack of funds [3]. - The company also participated in a significant transaction involving the Panama Canal, offering $22.8 billion, which is roughly equivalent to its total profits over the past four years [3]. Group 2: Historical Context and Growth - BlackRock's rise to prominence was significantly influenced by its acquisition of Barclays Global Investors in 2008 for $13.5 billion, which propelled its assets from $1.3 trillion to $3.3 trillion [8][9]. - Under Larry Fink's leadership, BlackRock's market capitalization grew from $1.1 billion at its IPO in 1999 to $44.8 billion by 2009, marking a 40-fold increase over ten years [9][11]. Group 3: ESG Investment and Political Dynamics - Larry Fink has been a strong advocate for ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) investing, aligning with Democratic agendas and promoting sustainable investment practices [12]. - Despite initial success with ESG funds, BlackRock has faced backlash from Republican-led states, leading to significant withdrawals, such as $7.94 billion from Louisiana and $8.5 billion from Texas [13][14]. - The political landscape has shifted, with some officials now recognizing potential benefits from collaboration with BlackRock, especially following the Panama Canal deal [14]. Group 4: Opportunities in China - BlackRock views China as a significant opportunity, having been one of the largest beneficiaries of China's financial market opening since 2011 [16]. - The firm has established a strong presence in China, acquiring various licenses to operate in the asset management sector, including QDLP and RQFII licenses [17][20]. - However, recent geopolitical tensions and regulatory scrutiny have raised questions about the viability of continuing operations in China, prompting a reassessment of investment strategies [20][22]. Group 5: Challenges and Future Outlook - Despite its strong licensing position, BlackRock's public fund management in China has not seen significant growth, with its assets remaining below 100 billion RMB [21]. - The firm faces challenges in maintaining its competitive edge amid increasing regulatory pressures and changing market dynamics [22]. - The future of BlackRock's operations in China may hinge on its ability to navigate these complexities while continuing to seek growth opportunities [22].

2025 年的一季度，贝莱德上了两次热搜。 第一次是 2 月底，这家全球最大的资产管理公司，断供了上海两栋写字楼 7.8 亿人民币的贷款。要知 道贝莱德 2024 年末的资产管理规模达到 11.6 万亿美元，体量之大可以位列全球第三大经济体。仅计 算它所持有中国科技巨头——腾讯、比亚迪、美团、阿里、小米的股票，价值就接近 3000 亿人民币。 与此同时，贝莱德整个 2024 年的净利润接近 64 亿美元，显然不是因为没钱才当的"老赖"。 毕竟，反手贝莱德又以买家的身份出现在了巴拿马运河的世纪交易案中，228 亿美元的开价，差不多是 贝莱德过去四年的利润总和。 如果你在生活中遇到一个税后可以存下 200 万的小红书金领，刚刚拿出四年的积蓄溢价买入一套市中 心黄金地段的老房子，却告诉别人自己供不起一只入门级 LV 的消费贷，你一定觉得匪夷所思。 但当一个富可敌国的超级资本集团，做出这种看似矛盾的取舍时，它一定是把自己的算盘抠到了旁人无 法企及的高度。 在金融世界的食物链中，中小机构可以只活在金融周期里，大型机构会被迫活在经济周期里，而超级财 团则必须活在政治周期里。 混乱即阶梯 众所周知，贝莱德崛起的关键转折是 ...