高端AI芯片(英伟达H20)

Search documents
拿到稀土的特朗普狂喊“赢麻了”!中方对美国,只提了一个要求
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-12 14:07
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the strategic leverage China holds over the U.S. in the rare earth market, particularly in light of recent trade tensions and tariffs imposed by the U.S. on Chinese goods. The U.S. military's reliance on rare earth elements for advanced technologies, such as the F-35 fighter jet, highlights the critical nature of this resource in the ongoing geopolitical struggle between the two nations [1][5][20]. Group 1: Rare Earth Market Dynamics - In April 2025, the U.S. imposed new tariffs, prompting China to restrict rare earth exports, significantly impacting U.S. military capabilities [1][3]. - The U.S. saw a 48.3% drop in rare earth imports in May 2025, with costs increasing threefold, leading to urgent negotiations between U.S. officials and China [1][5]. - China controls 90% of global rare earth processing capacity, making it a crucial player for U.S. industries reliant on these materials, such as military, AI chips, and electric vehicles [3][20]. Group 2: U.S.-China Negotiations - Internal disagreements within the U.S. delegation were evident, with differing opinions on tariff negotiations and rare earth supply [7][9]. - The Chinese government made it clear that any discussions would require the U.S. to lift unilateral sanctions and that military-related rare earth supplies would remain restricted [10][17]. - The outcome of the negotiations resulted in a temporary suspension of some tariffs, but military-related rare earth exports and high-end chip technology remained heavily regulated [15][20]. Group 3: Strategic Implications - The negotiations reflect a broader power struggle, with China using its rare earth dominance as a tactical leverage against U.S. tariffs [20][22]. - The article suggests that the U.S. is in a vulnerable position, needing rare earth supplies while attempting to maintain a tough stance on tariffs [20][22]. - China's approach emphasizes a clear stance on sovereignty and development rights, indicating that any future negotiations will be contingent on mutual respect and adherence to international norms [17][22].