Group 1 - Jiangsu issued 5-year general local bonds with a scale of 8.95 billion yuan and an issuance rate of 1.61%, with a marginal multiple of 7.73 times, exceeding the expected multiple of 3.34 [1] - Jiangsu issued 7-year general local bonds with a scale of 76.12 billion yuan and an issuance rate of 1.70%, with a marginal multiple of 7.70 times, exceeding the expected multiple of 3.22 [1] - Jiangsu issued 7-year ordinary special local bonds with a scale of 2.3 billion yuan and an issuance rate of 1.70%, with a marginal multiple of 6.40 times, exceeding the expected multiple of 3.09 [1]

Group 1 - Chongqing issued 30-year special local bonds with a scale of 50.08 billion and an issuance rate of 2.06% with a marginal multiple of 17.43 times, exceeding the expected multiple of 2.02 [1] - Chongqing issued 7-year general local bonds with a scale of 175.55 billion and an issuance rate of 1.69% with a marginal multiple of 3.12 times, surpassing the expected multiple of 1.69 [1] - Chongqing issued 15-year ordinary special local bonds with a scale of 22.77 billion and an issuance rate of 1.95% with a marginal multiple of 2.97 times, above the expected multiple of 1.94 [1]

Group 1 - Tianjin issued 7-year general local bonds with a scale of 4.48133 billion, an issuance rate of 1.6700%, and a marginal multiple of 2.73, exceeding the expected multiple of 1.69 [1] - Tianjin issued 5-year ordinary special local bonds with a scale of 7.54000 billion, an issuance rate of 1.5800%, and a marginal multiple of 1.59, slightly below the expected multiple of 1.60 [1] - Tianjin issued 7-year ordinary special local bonds with a scale of 9.92700 billion, an issuance rate of 1.6700%, and a marginal multiple of 1.38, also below the expected multiple of 1.69 [1]

Group 1 - Anhui issued 7-year general local bonds with a scale of 12.7967 billion, an issuance rate of 1.6500%, and a marginal multiple of 1.65, with an expected multiple of 1.67 [1] - Anhui issued 10-year general local bonds with a scale of 89.2033 billion, an issuance rate of 1.7300%, and a marginal multiple of 2.44, with an expected multiple of 1.73 [1] - Anhui issued 10-year ordinary special local bonds with a scale of 2.9300 billion, an issuance rate of 1.7400%, and a marginal multiple of 3.77, with an expected multiple of 1.72 [1]

Group 1 - Fujian issued 7-year general local bonds with a scale of 10.00949 billion, an issuance rate of 1.6500%, and a marginal multiple of 1.43, with an expected multiple of 1.68 [1] - Fujian issued 3-year ordinary special local bonds with a scale of 541.94 million, an issuance rate of 1.4400%, and a marginal multiple of 1.96, with an expected multiple of 1.45 [1] - Fujian issued 10-year ordinary special local bonds with a scale of 8.65481 billion, an issuance rate of 1.7000%, and a marginal multiple of 2.33, with an expected multiple of 1.73 [1]

Group 1 - Sichuan issued 7-year general local bonds with a scale of 6.81889 billion, an issuance rate of 1.6300%, and a marginal multiple of 1.79 times, exceeding the expected multiple of 1.71 [1] - Sichuan issued 30-year ordinary special local bonds with a scale of 16.379 billion, an issuance rate of 2.0400%, and a marginal multiple of 6.00 times, surpassing the expected multiple of 1.94 [1] - Sichuan issued 30-year other special local bonds with a scale of 3.619 billion, an issuance rate of 2.0400%, and a marginal multiple of 7.22 times, also exceeding the expected multiple of 1.94 [1]

Group 1 - Henan issued 7-year general local bonds with a scale of 18 billion yuan and an issuance interest rate of 1.63% [1] - The marginal multiple for the 7-year bonds was 2.33 times, with an expected multiple of 2.32 [1] - Henan also issued 15-year rural special local bonds with a scale of 7.45 billion yuan and an issuance interest rate of 1.93% [1] Group 2 - The marginal multiple for the 15-year rural bonds was 40 times, with an expected multiple of 2.30 [1]

Group 1 - Xinjiang issued 10-year general local bonds with a scale of 27.53 billion yuan and an issuance rate of 1.74%, with a marginal multiple of 5.44 times, exceeding the expected multiple of 1.73 [1] - Xinjiang issued 7-year general local bonds with a scale of 17.12 billion yuan and an issuance rate of 1.63%, with a marginal multiple of 2.04 times, exceeding the expected multiple of 1.64 [1] - Xinjiang issued 10-year special local bonds for housing improvement with a scale of 0.26 billion yuan and an issuance rate of 1.77%, with a marginal multiple of 1.67 times, slightly below the expected multiple of 1.72 [1] - Xinjiang issued 15-year other special local bonds with a scale of 27.71 billion yuan and an issuance rate of 1.95%, with a marginal multiple of 2.21 times, exceeding the expected multiple of 1.93 [1]

Group 1 - Guizhou issued a 15-year special local government bond for urban renovation with a scale of 3.208 billion and an issuance rate of 1.9500%, achieving a marginal multiple of 2.78 times against an expected multiple of 1.94 [1] - Guizhou issued a 30-year special local government bond with a scale of 4.000 billion and an issuance rate of 2.0400%, achieving a remarkable marginal multiple of 47.25 times against an expected multiple of 1.99 [1] - Guizhou issued a 7-year general local government bond with a scale of 89.3999 billion and an issuance rate of 1.6300%, achieving a marginal multiple of 1.20 times against an expected multiple of 1.64 [1]

Group 1 - Beijing issued 3-year general local bonds with a scale of 7.2 billion yuan and an issuance rate of 1.48%, with a marginal multiple of 3.49 times, exceeding the expected multiple of 1.49 [1] - Beijing issued 5-year general local bonds with a scale of 33.155 billion yuan and an issuance rate of 1.59%, with a marginal multiple of 3.83 times, exceeding the expected multiple of 1.60 [1] - Beijing issued 7-year general local bonds with a scale of 114.9181 billion yuan and an issuance rate of 1.64%, with a marginal multiple of 1.79 times, slightly above the expected multiple of 1.65 [1] - Beijing issued 1-year ordinary special local bonds with a scale of 7.7201 billion yuan and an issuance rate of 1.46%, achieving a high marginal multiple of 6.94 times, significantly above the expected multiple of 1.47 [1]