Workflow
901型综合补给舰
icon
Search documents
日本防卫省:中国海军辽宁舰、山东舰航母编队首次同时在日本附近的太平洋海域活动
Guan Cha Zhe Wang· 2025-06-10 03:46
Core Viewpoint - The simultaneous presence of two Chinese aircraft carriers, Liaoning and Shandong, in the Western Pacific marks a significant development in China's naval capabilities, showcasing a new level of operational readiness and strategic reach [1][4][6]. Summary by Sections Naval Operations - On June 7, Japan's Self-Defense Forces confirmed the presence of the Liaoning carrier group, which included the 052D destroyer Tangshan, the 055 destroyer Wuxi, and the 901 supply ship Hohhot, approximately 300 kilometers southwest of Minami-Torishima [1]. - The Liaoning conducted flight operations for carrier-based fighter jets and helicopters on June 8, and had previously performed similar operations in the East China Sea and the Pacific from May 25 to May 30 [1][4]. - On the same day, the Shandong carrier group, which included the 055 destroyer Zunyi and two 054A frigates, was confirmed to be operating approximately 550 kilometers southeast of Miyako Island [4]. Strategic Implications - This event is historically significant as it represents the first time both Chinese aircraft carriers have operated together outside the First Island Chain, indicating a shift in China's naval strategy towards more assertive operations in the Pacific [6][9]. - The dual carrier deployment allows for enhanced operational flexibility, enabling coordinated strikes and increased air sorties, thereby complicating the response for foreign militaries [6][7]. International Reactions - Japanese media highlighted the strategic implications of the Liaoning's operations near Japan, interpreting it as a breakthrough into the Second Island Chain [9]. - Reports from international outlets, including Reuters, noted that this development reflects China's growing naval capabilities and its intent to project power further into the Pacific [9]. - The U.S. military has not publicly responded to the activities of the Liaoning, with current U.S. carrier operations positioned away from the area [11].
中国航母“最深入太平洋的一次远航” 靠近日本最东端
Guan Cha Zhe Wang· 2025-06-09 03:49
Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Navy's Liaoning aircraft carrier group has reportedly broken through the Second Island Chain, reaching the waters southwest of Japan's Minami-Tori-shima, marking a significant enhancement in China's naval capabilities and long-range operational reach [1][5]. Summary by Sections Naval Movements - The Liaoning carrier group, including the 052D destroyer Tangshan and the 055 destroyer Wuxi, was confirmed to be operating approximately 300 kilometers southwest of Minami-Tori-shima [4]. - The carrier conducted flight operations for both carrier-based fighter jets and helicopters during its journey [4]. - The last recorded movement of the Liaoning was on May 30, after which there was a seven-day gap in reporting its activities until it reappeared near Minami-Tori-shima on June 7 [5]. Japanese Response - The Japan Self-Defense Forces dispatched the destroyer "Yahagi" to monitor the Liaoning carrier group after it was detected again [4]. - Japanese media highlighted the significance of the Liaoning's presence near Japan's easternmost islands, indicating a shift in regional naval dynamics [5]. Historical Context - Minami-Tori-shima, Japan's easternmost island, has historical military significance, having been involved in World War II naval operations [6]. - Since May, at least three 055 destroyers, three 052D destroyers, and four 054A frigates have been active in the Pacific beyond the First Island Chain, indicating a broader operational scope for the Chinese Navy [6]. U.S. Naval Activity - The U.S. Navy has not responded to the activities of the Liaoning carrier group, with the nearest U.S. carrier, the "Nimitz," operating near the Philippines [7]. - Current U.S. carrier operations do not appear to be in direct response to the movements of the Liaoning [7]. Official Statements - The Chinese Ministry of Defense stated that the Liaoning's training activities are not aimed at any specific country and comply with international law, suggesting that Japan's reactions may be excessive [9].