截至目前，如果只计算已经官宣的舰艇，包括刚刚官宣的 052D 娄底舰，中国海军目前 4000 吨级以上主力驱护舰已经达到 101 艘，其中： 055 型驱逐舰 8 艘； 052D 型驱逐舰 32 艘； 052C 型驱逐舰 6 艘； 052B 型驱逐舰 2 艘； 052 型驱逐舰 2 艘； 051C 型驱逐舰 2 艘； 051B 型驱逐舰 1 艘； 956E/EM 型驱逐舰 4 艘； 054B 型护卫舰 2 艘； 054A 型护卫舰 40 艘； 054 型护卫舰 2 艘。 IT之家 1 月 2 日消息，人民海军又一艘 052D 型导弹驱逐舰亮相！据央视昨日报道，人民海军 052D 家族迎来"新成员"—— 娄底舰（IT之家注：舷号 176） 正式亮相，成为 2026 年内首艘官宣服役的主力战舰。 作为我国 052D 型导弹驱逐舰家族的"新成员"，它在雷达、武器系统和网络架构等方面全面升级，具备强大的区域防空、对海打击和编队指挥能力。大国重 器，驰骋深蓝，守护万里海疆！ 秒 > 新浪财经APP 24小时全球 基金资讯 下载APP > r 告 央视军事 它（娄底舰）既能对敌实现远程的突击和打击 ...

【文/观察者网专栏作者 施洋】 本周，对于世界海军观察人士而言，可能是心情复杂的一周：美国总统特朗普亲自宣布了以他名字定级 的战列舰建造计划，朝鲜则公开其已经完成总体合拢的核动力战略导弹潜艇，二者都对当代海军装备产 生了某种颠覆性影响；与此同时，史上最晚中国军力报告在圣诞节前的最后关头姗姗来迟，内容却乏善 可陈，各方媒体报道的重点选择，显然说明了他们的立场与关切。 谁推动了海军历史？ 本周一，美国总统特朗普与国务卿卢比奥、战争部长赫格塞斯、海军部长约翰·费伦一起在海湖庄园召 开记者会，宣布美国将打造所谓"金色舰队"，并公布其最新装备方案——"特朗普"级战列舰。 归根到底，战列舰无论在哪个时代都是吞金巨兽，在火炮主导海战的时代，由于战列舰是海上火力、机 动、防护三者结合最高级的装备种类，也是按照马汉海权理论夺取制海权最为核心的武器，海军大国因 此纷纷斥巨资加以发展。但当导弹和舰载机作为在火力投掷距离和精度上远超舰炮的新武器出现以后， 海军舰队的发展思路自然就发生了转变：航空母舰作为打击距离更远的装备获得了青睐，而导弹由于对 发射平台的兼容度更高，彻底取代了大口径舰炮在海战中的位置。 按照美国军方"金色舰队"官方 ...

转自：北京日报客户端 来源：环球网 谁都知道，鸡蛋碰石头，碎的只能是鸡蛋。近日一段视频广受关注，大陆的福建舰已披甲出海，其搭载 的电磁弹射器在2秒内将歼-15T、歼-35、歼-15DT、空警-600等先进舰载机弹射起飞，滑块在轨道末端 瞬间制动，甲板上战机起降如行云流水。从辽宁舰到山东舰，再到福建舰，中国航母编队已航向深蓝， 舰载机联队、预警体系、电子战能力、远程打击网络全面成型。台湾那所谓"以武拒统"的盘算只能是幻 想，毕竟所谓"军力"，难道说是老旧舰艇、0交付的F-16V"隐形战机"吗？ 作者: 北平锋 中国从不惧恐吓，而是靠实力说话。九三阅兵，"巨浪-3""东风-61""东风-31""东风-5C"震撼亮相，那一 刻，世界看清了什么是"压倒性优势"。如今，福建舰甲板上的电磁弹射声，是比任何宣言都更响亮的宣 告——中国有能力在任何时间、任何空间，完成国家统一的使命。民意基础，是14亿多人对祖国统一、 民族复兴的共同渴望；物质基础，是全球最完整的工业体系；实力基础，是歼-20、运-20、055型驱逐 舰、高超音速武器构成的立体作战体系。台湾若真想安全，绝非依靠购买美国军火，而是要回到"九二 共识"的正道；不是 ...

【环球网：#台独以卵击石碎的只能是鸡蛋#】#福建舰电磁弹射声比任何宣言更响亮#12月26日，环球网 发文《"以卵击石能赢"的谎言应早日被肃清》。全文如下：谁都知道，鸡蛋碰石头，碎的只能是鸡蛋。 近日一段视频广受关注，大陆的福建舰已披甲出海，其搭载的电磁弹射器在2秒内将歼-15T、歼-35、 歼-15DT、空警-600等先进舰载机弹射起飞，滑块在轨道末端瞬间制动，甲板上战机起降如行云流水。 从辽宁舰到山东舰，再到福建舰，中国航母编队已航向深蓝，舰载机联队、预警体系、电子战能力、远 程打击网络全面成型。台湾那所谓"以武拒统"的盘算只能是幻想，毕竟所谓"军力"，难道说是老旧舰 艇、0交付的F-16V"隐形战机"吗？赖清德之流，长期推行"去中国化"教育，蓄意篡改历史教科书，刻意 抹去两岸共同记忆，把"抗中谋独"当成精神鸦片，导致部分台湾年轻人误以为台湾是所谓"主权独立国 家"，把大陆的和平统一曲解为"侵略威胁"。他们用"文化台独"的毒液，浇灌出一代人对现实的懵懂无 知——他们不知道福建舰的强大战力，不知道东风-17全天候、强突防的战略威慑能力，更不清楚大陆 贯通情报链、指挥链、打击链、保障链于一体的联合作战体系的巨大 ...

奉劝美方，切勿再向"台独"势力递刀子、拱火浇油！正告赖清德，世界上只有一个中国，中国的主权、 统一、领土完整不容分割，"台独"分裂行径注定是死路一条！鸡蛋碰石头，碎的是鸡蛋，永远不是石 头。（北平锋） 赖清德之流，长期推行"去中国化"教育，蓄意篡改历史教科书，刻意抹去两岸共同记忆，把"抗中谋 独"当成精神鸦片，导致部分台湾年轻人误以为台湾是所谓"主权独立国家"，把大陆的和平统一曲解 为"侵略威胁"。他们用"文化台独"的毒液，浇灌出一代人对现实的懵懂无知——他们不知道福建舰的强 大战力，不知道东风-17全天候、强突防的战略威慑能力，更不清楚大陆贯通情报链、指挥链、打击 链、保障链于一体的联合作战体系的巨大威力。正因为教育系统主动切断了文化的根脉，在刻意煽动的 恐惧与迷茫中，荒谬的谎言生根发芽。更可悲的是，台湾部分政客还对美国的"纸老虎"许诺深信不疑。 他们以为，只要喊几句"民主对抗威权"的口号，华盛顿就会出面干预。他们忘了，早有外媒点破：基于 兵推，"美国军方在保卫台湾时的风险极高，并可能导致军事失败"。"台独"政客并非不知死活，而是将 台湾民众的命运当成赌桌上的筹码，用民众的血汗钱，去豪赌一场注定满盘皆输的分 ...

这篇国际评论，主要来分析全球军火市场火爆，中国军工却逆势减速，背后不是实力滑坡，而是多重现实因素交织的阶段性结果。 其中美国39家企业就拿走半壁江山，收入达3340亿美元，欧洲企业也借着俄乌冲突和扩军潮赚得盆满钵满。但诡异的是，作为全球最大武器进口地区的亚 太，却成了唯一收入下滑的区域，而中国军工企业的收入回落正是主要原因。 一边是九三阅兵上东风- 5C洲际导弹、歼- 35隐身舰载机等国之重器集体亮相，展现出世界一流的军工实力，一边是营收数据逆势下滑，这看似矛盾的现 象，绝非中国军工"实力滑坡"，而是多重现实因素交织的阶段性结果。 欧罗巴的"排他性俱乐部"：高门槛下无缘入局 全球军火市场的这波暴增，很大程度上是"战火"催生的。乌克兰危机持续多年，欧洲各国都在忙着"补课"和"升级"，国防开支水涨船高。 特别是北约成员国，他们的军事采购有条"金科玉律"：必须符合北约的作战标准和系统。这就好比，大家都在用iPhone生态，你拿着一部配置再高、价格再 实惠的安卓旗舰，也无法无缝融入。 这种"标准不兼容"的壁垒，直接将中国军工挡在了欧洲市场的大门之外。美国的企业凭借着北约体系内的天然优势，轻松拿走了欧洲高达1400亿美 ...

Core Insights - The article discusses China's military-industrial capabilities, emphasizing its ability to rapidly scale production and integrate civilian and military resources, which poses a significant challenge to other nations [1][2][28]. Group 1: Military-Industrial Integration - China's military and civilian sectors have been effectively integrated, allowing for rapid conversion of production lines from civilian to military use, exemplified by the ability to switch from electric vehicle battery production to military applications [4][5][20]. - The "military-civilian integration" strategy has transformed the entire national production capacity into a potential wartime resource, enhancing mobilization capabilities [15][19]. Group 2: Production Capacity and Efficiency - China's industrial output, including steel and shipbuilding, has surpassed historical peaks, enabling sustained production of military equipment under high-intensity conditions [11][12]. - The country has developed a "mass production" model for military equipment, allowing for quick scaling and continuous supply, which is a significant advantage in prolonged conflicts [17][26]. Group 3: Organizational and Mobilization Strength - China's ability to mobilize resources and personnel quickly in emergencies, such as natural disasters, reflects a deep-rooted organizational capability that can be leveraged in military scenarios [6][9]. - The integration of reserve forces and civilian volunteers into the military framework enhances China's readiness and adaptability in times of conflict [9][23]. Group 4: Strategic Implications - The article suggests that the true deterrent power lies not in advanced technology alone but in the ability to sustain prolonged operations and mobilize the entire nation for war [25][29]. - China's approach to modern warfare redefines traditional concepts, emphasizing the importance of industrial capacity and societal mobilization in achieving military objectives [21][28].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the first live military training of the Fujian aircraft carrier after its commissioning, highlighting three key points regarding its operational capabilities and the development of China's naval forces [1]. Group 1: Aircraft Compatibility - The training validated the compatibility of various aircraft, including J-35, J-15T, J-15DT, and KJ-600, with the Fujian carrier, demonstrating its advanced electromagnetic catapult system [2]. - The successful launch and recovery of multiple aircraft types indicate that the Fujian carrier has achieved combat readiness shortly after its commissioning [2]. - Enhanced coordination between the carrier's departments and the aircraft has improved launch efficiency, thereby increasing the operational effectiveness of the Fujian carrier in maritime defense tasks [2]. Group 2: Fleet Formation and Combat Capability - The Fujian carrier conducted multi-subject training alongside the Type 055 destroyer Yan'an and Type 054A frigate Tongliao, emphasizing the importance of fleet formation in naval operations [3]. - The Type 055 destroyer and Type 054A frigate possess strong comprehensive combat capabilities, contributing to the overall combat effectiveness of the carrier group [3]. - The formation of a multi-dimensional combat system, integrating air, surface, and underwater capabilities, signifies the Fujian carrier's advanced operational capacity [3]. Group 3: High-Level Naval Development - The Fujian carrier's ability to conduct live training shortly after its commissioning reflects the high level of development and operational readiness of China's aircraft carriers [4]. - The successful integration of the Fujian carrier into naval operations indicates that Chinese naval personnel have effectively mastered carrier operations [4]. - Recent advancements, such as the successful sea trial of the Type 076 amphibious assault ship, further demonstrate the progress in China's naval modernization and technological capabilities [5].

Group 1 - The article commemorates the 98th anniversary of the founding of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and highlights its historical significance and contributions to national defense and security [1] - It emphasizes the importance of a strong military for national security, stating that a solid defense is essential for the survival of the nation [1] - The article reflects on the 80th anniversary of the victory in the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, noting the sacrifices made by the Chinese people and their role in the global anti-fascist efforts [1] Group 2 - The report features the naval ship Nanchang, the first of the 055 destroyer class, which has been actively participating in various military exercises and missions since its commissioning [12] - Nanchang's crew performed a flag-raising ceremony and reaffirmed their commitment to serving the nation, highlighting the ship's operational readiness and capabilities [12][14] - The article also mentions the naval ship Nanjing, a 052D destroyer, which has maintained high combat readiness and participated in significant training exercises [15][17][19] Group 3 - The article discusses the training activities of the naval ships Hubei and Hainan, both of which are 075 amphibious assault ships, emphasizing their advanced capabilities and operational roles [20][22] - These ships are designed for large-scale amphibious operations, with features that enhance their operational efficiency, such as a large flight deck and capacity for various military vehicles [22]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the competitive landscape of the shipbuilding industry, highlighting the significant investments planned by the U.S. to surpass China's dominance, while questioning India's potential to invest similarly and achieve its ambitious goals in shipbuilding [1][3]. Investment Plans - The U.S. plans to invest $30 billion to revitalize its shipbuilding industry and surpass China's leading position, which currently holds a 53% market share in global shipbuilding [3]. - India aims to become a top ten shipbuilding nation by 2030 and a top five by 2047, reflecting a strong ambition despite its current market share of only 0.05% [3]. Market Share and Production Capacity - As of now, China's shipbuilding industry dominates with a 53% share, while the U.S. holds 0.1% and India 0.05% [3]. - In 2024, the U.S. constructed five large ships with a total tonnage of approximately 76,000 tons, while India produced vessels totaling 25,500 tons [8]. Competitive Challenges - South Korea's shipbuilding industry has benefited from U.S. policies, increasing its market share from 19% to 25% due to orders shifting away from China [5]. - Despite the increase in orders, South Korea faces challenges with production capacity and technological gaps compared to China, which has a 15% to 20% technology advantage in high-end shipbuilding [5]. Future Projections - China's state-owned shipbuilding enterprise plans to increase its production from 250 ships in the previous year to 300 ships by 2025, with a projected total tonnage of 16 million tons [8]. - The average annual launch of naval vessels by China exceeds ten, while the U.S. manages fewer than three, illustrating a significant disparity in shipbuilding capabilities [9]. Global Maritime Competition - The article emphasizes that the current maritime competition is taking place within national shipyards rather than on the open seas, indicating a strategic focus on domestic production capabilities [11].