财务数据显示，截至2025年9月30日，海宁晶科资产总额约为205.37亿元，负债总额约为120.61亿元，经 计算，公司资产负债率约为58.73%。2024年及2025年前三季度，海宁晶科营收分别约为213.95亿元、 167.61亿元，净利润分别约为10.44亿元、2882.63万元。 又一家光伏巨头欲借子公司增资扩股进行融资。光伏组件龙头厂商晶科能源近日披露公告称，控股子公 司晶科能源（海宁）有限公司（以下简称"海宁晶科"）拟引入战略投资者实施增资扩股，各方拟合计以 现金增资不超过30亿元。对于增资款项用途，晶科能源方面坦言，将主要用于海宁晶科偿还金融负债或 经营性负债等。晶科能源子公司拟引入战投的背后，截至2025年前三季度末，海宁晶科、晶科能源的资 产负债率分别为58.73%、74.48%。 公告显示，海宁晶科拟实施增资扩股并引入兴银金融资产投资有限公司、中国东方资产管理股份有限公 司等战略投资者，各方拟合计以现金增资不超过30亿元，预计合计取得海宁晶科增资后的股权比例不超 过24.67%。 晶科能源方面告诉北京商报记者，海宁晶科主要涉及公司高效N型TOPCon产能，具有行业领先的技术 和成本优势； ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing "anti-involution" trend in the photovoltaic (PV) industry, highlighted by the recent centralized procurement bidding by China Huadian Corporation, which reflects changes in pricing and competition dynamics within the sector [3][5]. Group 1: Procurement Details - China Huadian Corporation's centralized procurement for PV modules spans a total scale of 20GW, divided into two segments: 18GW for segment one and 2GW for segment two [3]. - The average bidding price for segment one has risen to 0.71 yuan/W, exceeding the previously established industry self-discipline floor price of 0.692 yuan/W, with only a few bids below 0.7 yuan/W [3]. - For segment one, over 40 companies participated, with bid prices ranging from 0.6464 yuan/W to 0.7518 yuan/W, and an average of 0.7103 yuan/W, where only five bids were below 0.7 yuan/W [4]. - Segment two requires high-efficiency N-type TOPCon, HJT, and BC modules, with 26 companies bidding, and prices ranging from 0.7076 yuan/W to 0.8431 yuan/W, averaging 0.7461 yuan/W, with over 60% of bids above 0.73 yuan/W [4]. Group 2: Industry Self-Regulation Initiatives - The China Photovoltaic Industry Association (CPIA) issued an initiative to strengthen industry self-regulation, emphasizing the need for fair competition and adherence to legal frameworks to combat predatory pricing [5]. - The initiative calls for optimizing bidding rules by reducing price weight and increasing the importance of technical evaluation in the bidding process [5]. - Recent discussions among various government departments have focused on curbing low-price disorderly competition and establishing effective pricing mechanisms to prevent below-cost sales and false marketing practices [6].