Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Net sales increased by 3% in the second quarter, with comparable net sales rising by 5% after excluding prior year sales related to divested businesses and foreign currency exchange [21] - Adjusted gross profit decreased by $90 million, or 10%, compared to the prior year, primarily due to higher commodity costs and unfavorable volume mix [22] - Adjusted earnings per share was $2.10, a decrease of 24% versus the prior year [23] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Uncrustables brand net sales grew by 7% at the total company level, with significant household penetration potential remaining [4][5] - Café Bustelo brand net sales increased by 41% in the U.S. retail coffee portfolio, driven by distribution expansion and marketing investments [8] - Milk-Bone brand showed sequential improvement in net sales growth, with expectations to return to growth in the latter half of the fiscal year [9] - Meow Mix brand outpaced the dry cat food category, growing sales nearly three times the category rate [11] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - U.S. retail coffee segment net sales increased by 21%, driven by higher pricing to recover increased commodity costs [23] - U.S. retail frozen handheld and spreads saw a net sales decrease of 5%, primarily due to declines in peanut butter and fruit spreads [24] - U.S. retail pet foods net sales decreased by 7%, reflecting a decline in dog snacks [25] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on three strategic priorities: accelerating organic growth, embedding transformation, and fostering a be-bold mindset [3] - The company aims to position the Uncrustables brand to generate over $1 billion in net sales by the end of the fiscal year [7] - The Hostess brand strategy includes reducing SKU count by 25% to simplify offerings and prioritize high-velocity products [12] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in navigating a dynamic environment, focusing on elements within their control to drive long-term growth [20] - The company anticipates full-year net sales guidance to increase by 3.5%-4.5%, reflecting challenges from divested businesses [29] - Adjusted earnings per share guidance range is narrowed to $8.75-$9.25, maintaining the previous midpoint [33] Other Important Information - Free cash flow for the second quarter was $280 million, down from $317 million in the prior year [28] - The company plans to prioritize debt reduction, aiming to pay down $500 million of debt annually [28] Q&A Session Summary - No specific questions and answers were provided in the content, thus this section is omitted.

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Net sales increased by 3% in the second quarter, with comparable net sales rising by 5% after excluding prior year sales related to divested businesses and foreign currency exchange [22] - Adjusted gross profit decreased by $90 million, or 10%, compared to the prior year, primarily due to higher commodity costs and unfavorable volume mix [23] - Adjusted earnings per share was $2.10, a decrease of 24% versus the prior year [24] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Uncrustables brand net sales grew by 7% at the total company level, with significant household penetration potential remaining [4][5] - Café Bustelo brand net sales increased by 41% in the U.S. retail coffee portfolio, driven by distribution expansion and marketing investments [8] - Milk-Bone brand showed sequential improvement in net sales growth, with expectations to return to growth in the latter half of the fiscal year [9][10] - Meow Mix brand outpaced the dry cat food category, growing sales nearly three times the category rate [11] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - U.S. retail coffee segment net sales increased by 21%, with net price realization contributing significantly to this growth [24] - U.S. retail frozen handheld and spreads saw a net sales decline of 5%, primarily due to decreases in peanut butter and fruit spreads [25] - U.S. retail pet foods experienced a 7% decrease in net sales, driven by declines in dog snacks [26] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on three strategic priorities: accelerating organic growth, embedding transformation, and fostering a be-bold mindset [3] - The strategy includes significant investments in brand-building and innovation, particularly for key growth platforms like Uncrustables and Café Bustelo [4][7] - The company aims to stabilize and position the Hostess brand for long-term growth through SKU reduction and improved marketing [12][15] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in navigating a dynamic environment, emphasizing the importance of controlling internal factors [21] - The company anticipates continued double-digit growth for the Café Bustelo brand and a positive outlook for the Uncrustables brand [9][18] - Future growth opportunities are expected in the away from home business, which is projected to grow to approximately 10% of total company net sales this fiscal year [20] Other Important Information - Free cash flow for the second quarter was $280 million, down from $317 million in the prior year [29] - The company plans to prioritize debt reduction, aiming to pay down $500 million of debt annually [29] - Full-year net sales guidance is narrowed to an increase of 3.5%-4.5%, reflecting various headwinds from divested businesses [30][31] Q&A Session Summary Question: What are the growth expectations for the Uncrustables brand? - The Uncrustables brand is on track to generate over $1 billion in net sales by the end of the fiscal year, with significant household penetration potential remaining [7] Question: How is the company addressing commodity cost pressures? - The company is managing commodity costs through flexible pricing strategies and anticipates normalization over time [16] Question: What is the outlook for the Hostess brand? - The Hostess brand is expected to stabilize performance and position for sustainable long-term growth through strategic actions and marketing efforts [15]

Market Overview - The stock market experienced a strong finish in 2024, driven by optimism around potential tax cuts and a robust M&A environment, but sentiment shifted in early 2025 due to concerns over tariffs, AI spending, and consumer health [2][3] - A remarkable recovery occurred in the second quarter of 2025, with U.S. equities approaching all-time highs, primarily led by large-cap technology and growth stocks, especially those related to AI and semiconductors [3] Fund Performance - Ariel Focus Fund gained +4.75% for the three-month period ending June 30, 2025, outperforming its primary Russell 1000 Value Index, which rose +3.79%, but lagged behind the S&P 500, which jumped +10.94% [4] - Key contributors to the fund's performance included Oracle Corporation, Mosaic Company, and Resideo Technologies, while J.M. Smucker Company, APA Corporation, and Core Laboratories were the largest detractors [4][10][12] Company Insights - Oracle Corporation's shares reached an all-time high of over $245, driven by a potential $30 billion annual cloud contract with OpenAI and a doubling of its backlog, highlighting its strong long-term positioning in AI-driven enterprise software [6] - Mosaic Corporation's stock rose +35.88% due to favorable trade dynamics and a renewed focus on cost discipline, benefiting from increased demand for fertilizers driven by economic growth in developing countries [7][8] - Resideo Technologies rebounded with a +24.63% gain, supported by its leadership in smart home technology, despite challenges from a sluggish U.S. housing market [9] Challenges Faced - J.M. Smucker Company faced a -16.28% decline, primarily due to disappointing results from Hostess Brands, which saw a -14% drop in comparable revenue [10] - APA Corporation and Core Laboratories experienced declines of -11.62% and -23.09%, respectively, amid concerns about the energy sector's future despite ongoing demand for oil and gas [12][13]

This story was originally published on Food Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Food Dive newsletter. As food manufacturers look for opportunities to combat the rise of private label offerings, more CPG manufacturers are expected to sue retailers they claim are making copycat products. Earlier this month, J.M. Smucker sued Trader Joe’s, alleging the grocery chain’s version of crustless PB&J sandwiches is an “obvious copycat” of its Uncrustables frozen sandwiches. The law ...

Core Points - J.M. Smucker Company, known for Jif Peanut Butter and Uncrustables, has filed a lawsuit against Trader Joe's for allegedly replicating the design and packaging of Uncrustables [2][3][4] - Uncrustables has become a billion-dollar brand, generating approximately $920 million in annual sales, reflecting a 15% year-over-year increase [5][6] - The brand represents over 10% of J.M. Smucker's total revenue, highlighting its significance to the company's financial performance [6] Company Overview - J.M. Smucker has invested over $1 billion in the development and marketing of Uncrustables, which are frozen, pre-made sandwiches filled with peanut butter and jelly [5][6] - The company recently opened a $1.1 billion production facility in Alabama to meet rising demand, marking one of its largest capital investments [6] Industry Context - Trader Joe's operates a private-label business model, offering affordable, high-quality store-brand alternatives that compete with national brands [8] - The lawsuit reflects the competitive tension within the private-label market, where Trader Joe's has built a loyal customer base through exclusive products [8]

Core Strategy - The J.M. Smucker Company focuses on innovation and portfolio discipline as key enablers of long-term growth, strengthening core brands and aligning investments with evolving consumer needs [1][5] Consumer-led Innovation - Consumer-led innovation is a central growth driver across categories, with the Milk-Bone brand introducing new offerings like PB Bites and seasonal varieties to maintain engagement and brand loyalty despite selective spending by pet owners [2] SKU Rationalization - In sweet baked snacks, the company is rationalizing SKUs within the Hostess portfolio, prioritizing high-return sub-brands and discontinuing lower-performing products to enhance execution and profitability, with Donettes being a strong contributor [3] Frozen Handheld and Spreads Growth - The company emphasizes ongoing momentum in its frozen handheld and spreads portfolio, particularly through the Uncrustables platform, benefiting from broader distribution and expansion in convenience and away-from-home channels [4][8] Sales Growth Projections - The J.M. Smucker expects fiscal 2026 net sales to grow between 3% and 5%, with comparable net sales projected to advance roughly 4.5% to 6.5%, outperforming competitors like General Mills and Kraft Heinz [6]

Trader Joe's is in an apparently sticky situation over its crustless PB&J sandwiches. Smuckers, you know, home of the Uncrustable, is filing a lawsuit, saying that the TJ's version is an obvious copycat. A rep for Smuckers tells NBC News it's enforcing its trademark and protecting its distinct sandwich design.The company says traders needs to stop selling the crustless PB&J and deliver their stock to smuckers to be destroyed. So, but they'll also have to pay some damages if they lose. ...

Core Points - JM Smucker has filed a lawsuit against Trader Joe's for allegedly infringing on its trademark rights with a similar product, a crustless peanut butter and jelly sandwich [1][2] - The lawsuit highlights the similarities in product design, including crimped edges and a specific shade of blue in the packaging that Smucker has trademarked [2][3] - Uncrustables, Smucker's flagship product, has grown to nearly $1 billion in sales, with over 1.5 billion sandwiches produced annually [3] Company Overview - Smucker's Uncrustables brand is popular among children and is also consumed by NFL players, indicating a broad market appeal [8] - The company emphasizes the importance of protecting its trademarked design to maintain brand quality and prevent consumer confusion [3][9] Legal Context - The lawsuit claims that there is consumer confusion regarding the origin of Trader Joe's product, with social media discussions suggesting they may be produced in the same facilities as Uncrustables [9][10] - Smucker is seeking the removal of Trader Joe's crustless sandwiches and marketing materials, as well as compensation for profits earned from these products [11]

Core Viewpoint - The J.M. Smucker Co. has filed a federal lawsuit against Trader Joe's, alleging that the latter has copied its Uncrustables frozen sandwiches, claiming that the similarities in design and packaging infringe on Smucker's intellectual property rights [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Smucker's lawsuit was filed in Ohio federal court, asserting that Trader Joe's round, crustless sandwiches with crimped edges closely imitate Uncrustables [1]. - The company does not object to other brands selling similar products but insists that Trader Joe's cannot use Smucker's intellectual property for such sales [2]. - Smucker claims that Trader Joe's packaging design violates its trademarks, specifically citing the use of similar blue lettering and imagery [5]. Group 2: Customer Confusion - The lawsuit argues that the similarities between the products have already led to customer confusion, referencing a social media post where a user mistakenly believed Trader Joe's sandwiches were produced by Smucker [7]. Group 3: Legal Demands - Smucker is seeking restitution and a court order for Trader Joe's to destroy the infringing sandwich products and their packaging [8].

Core Viewpoint - The J.M. Smucker Co. is suing Trader Joe's, claiming that the grocery chain's new frozen peanut butter and jelly sandwiches infringe on Smucker's trademarks due to their similar design and packaging [1][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Smucker alleges that Trader Joe's sandwiches have the same pie-like crimp markings and round, crustless design as its Uncrustables, which violates its trademarks [1][6]. - The lawsuit states that the blue color of the packaging used by Trader Joe's is identical to that of Smucker's Uncrustables, further infringing on its trademarks [2][3]. - Smucker claims that the visual representation of a sandwich with a bite taken out of it on Trader Joe's packaging is also similar to Uncrustables, contributing to customer confusion [3][8]. Group 2: Brand Development and Investment - Smucker has invested over $1 billion in developing the Uncrustables brand over the past 20 years, focusing on perfecting the product and expanding its flavor offerings [7]. - The company emphasizes that it does not oppose the sale of other crustless sandwiches but cannot allow others to use its intellectual property for their sales [3][6]. Group 3: Previous Legal Actions - This lawsuit is not the first instance of Smucker protecting its Uncrustables brand; in 2022, it sent a cease and desist letter to a Minnesota company for producing similar products [13]. - The lawsuit follows a recent similar case where Mondelez International sued Aldi for packaging that resembled its well-known brands [14].