Core Viewpoint - A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed against Oracle Corporation, alleging that the company misled investors regarding its AI infrastructure investments and revenue growth potential during the specified Class Period from June 12, 2025, to December 16, 2025 [1]. Group 1: Allegations of Misconduct - Oracle allegedly misled investors by promoting its AI infrastructure contracts and falsely assuring that increased capital expenditures (CapEx) would lead to rapid revenue growth [4]. - S&P Global Ratings warned that OpenAI could account for over a third of Oracle's total revenues by fiscal 2028, raising concerns about the sustainability of Oracle's revenue projections [4]. - Following negative analyst reports and disappointing financial results, Oracle's stock price experienced significant declines, including a drop of $5.37 (nearly 2%) on September 24, 2025, and an additional decline of $17.13 (over 5.5%) on September 25, 2025 [5]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Projections - Oracle reported financial results for Q2 fiscal year 2026 that included revenue growth below analysts' expectations and negative free cash flow exceeding $10 billion [6]. - The company projected $50 billion in CapEx for fiscal year 2026, significantly higher than previous estimates, yet did not increase its revenue guidance for 2026 [6][10]. - Analysts noted a "bombshell disclosure" regarding Oracle's lease commitments, which increased to $248 billion, far exceeding previous commitments and raising concerns about the company's financial health [10]. Group 3: Market Reactions and Stock Performance - Following the announcement of increased lease commitments and delays in data center projects, Oracle's stock fell by $8.88 (approximately 4.5%) on December 12, 2025 [10]. - The withdrawal of Blue Owl Capital from a $10 billion funding deal for Oracle's data center projects led to a further decline in stock price by $10.19 (about 5.4%) on December 17, 2025 [11]. - The cost of protecting Oracle's debt against default reached its highest level since April 2009, indicating rising credit risk and investor concerns [9].

Baltimore, MD, Feb. 21, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Paradigm Press has recognized economist and author Jim Rickards as a leading financial forecaster following a series of high-profile political and macroeconomic developments that unfolded in line with projections he outlined in advance. The recognition from Paradigm Press highlights Rickards’ long-standing work analyzing structural changes across policy, global finance, and national strategy—research that continues to shape Paradigm Press’ editorial direction ...

Washington, D.C., Feb. 21, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Paradigm Press has recognized James Altucher for his recent presentation and sustained work examining how technological breakthroughs influence the evolution of business, entrepreneurship, and financial systems. The distinction reflects years of research and commentary focused on understanding how innovation progresses from early development into widespread economic force. Altucher’s work has consistently explored how new technologies alter the structure o ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Ardent Health, Inc. securities between July 18, 2024, and November 12, 2025, of the March 9, 2026, deadline to become a lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Ardent Health securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court by March 9, 2026, to serve as lead plaintiff [2] - The lawsuit claims that Ardent Health made misrepresentations regarding its accounts receivable and did not maintain sufficient professional malpractice liability insurance [4] Group 2: Misrepresentation Claims - Defendants allegedly misrepresented the process for determining the collectability of accounts receivable, claiming to use detailed reviews of historical collections, which was not the case [4] - The lawsuit indicates that Ardent Health's accounts receivable framework allowed for inflated reporting of accounts receivable and delayed recognition of losses on uncollectible accounts [4] - The firm did not maintain adequate professional malpractice liability insurance to cover claims arising from its operations, contrary to public statements [4] Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [3] - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [3] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its effectiveness in representing clients [3]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Smart Digital Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: SDM) during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on March 16, 2026 [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased SDM securities during the Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [3][6] - To serve as lead plaintiff, individuals must file a motion with the Court by March 16, 2026 [3] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4] - The firm was ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for the number of settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [4] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, and its founding partner was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by law360 in 2020 [4] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Smart Digital was involved in a market manipulation scheme, including social media misinformation and impersonation of financial professionals [5] - It is claimed that insiders used offshore accounts to facilitate the dumping of shares during a price inflation campaign, and that public statements omitted risks related to fraudulent trading [5] - As a result of these actions, Smart Digital securities faced the risk of trading suspension by the SEC and NASDAQ, leading to misleading statements about the company's business and operations [5]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Oracle Corporation for misleading statements regarding its AI infrastructure strategy and its financial implications during the Class Period from June 12, 2025, to December 16, 2025 [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Oracle's AI infrastructure strategy would lead to significant increases in capital expenditures without corresponding near-term revenue growth [5]. - It alleges that the increased spending poses risks to Oracle's debt, credit rating, free cash flow, and project funding capabilities [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that the defendants' statements about Oracle's business and prospects were materially false and misleading, resulting in investor damages when the truth was revealed [5]. Group 2: Participation Information - Investors who purchased Oracle common stock during the Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - To join the class action, interested parties can visit the provided link or contact the law firm directly for more information [3][6]. - A lead plaintiff must file a motion with the court by April 6, 2026, to represent other class members in the litigation [1][3]. Group 3: Law Firm Credentials - The Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its effectiveness in representing shareholder interests [4].

Core Insights - Interview Kickstart has released a career guide titled "How to Transition from Data Analyst to Data Scientist," aimed at helping data analysts evolve into data science roles in response to market demands [1][2]. Transition Framework - The guide emphasizes that the transition is not merely about adding machine learning tools but involves a significant change in responsibility and mindset, with data scientists expected to tackle ambiguous problems and influence strategic decisions [2][5]. - Prior analytics experience, particularly in SQL, data wrangling, and stakeholder communication, is highlighted as a valuable asset for this transition [5]. Roadmap for Transition - The publication outlines a phased approach for transitioning, starting with enhancing Python-based analysis, followed by a refresher on statistics and experimentation, and culminating in applied machine learning and end-to-end project development [6]. - It stresses the importance of focusing on a limited set of core models and evaluation metrics rather than attempting to master every algorithm [6]. Interview Preparation - The guide provides insights into the structure and evaluation of data scientist interviews, noting that candidates are tested on problem framing, causal reasoning, and SQL fluency under pressure [7]. - It identifies that many technically proficient analysts struggle in interviews due to difficulties in structuring ambiguous problems and translating results into business decisions [7]. Common Mistakes - Common pitfalls during the transition include viewing data science as merely "analytics plus machine learning" and overemphasizing tools at the expense of reasoning quality [8]. - The report concludes that successful transitions are deliberate, phased, and aligned with the evaluation criteria used by hiring managers [9].

Communiqué de PresseVELIZY-VILLACOUBLAY – 21 Février 2026 Dassault Systèmes annonce la nomination de Pascal Daloz comme Président-Directeur Général de Dassault Systèmes Bernard Charlès annonce se retirer de ses fonctions de Président du Conseil et d’administrateur, pour raisons personnelles Bernard Charlès entend mettre ses 43 années d’expérience dans l’industrie, ainsi que sa vision de la transformation par l’IA des processus industriels de création et de production, au service de l’économie générative Pas ...

Core Viewpoint - Dassault Systèmes announces the appointment of Pascal Daloz as both Chairman and Chief Executive Officer following the resignation of Bernard Charlès for personal reasons, ensuring continuity in leadership and governance [2][8]. Leadership Transition - Bernard Charlès has stepped down as Executive Chairman and member of the Board, effective immediately, and has expressed his confidence in Pascal Daloz to lead the company [2][8]. - Pascal Daloz has been with Dassault Systèmes for 25 years and shares a vision with Charlès to push the boundaries of science and innovation [3][4]. Company Vision and Strategy - The company aims to lead the transformation powered by Industrial AI through its 3D UNIV+RSES initiative, which is a long-term commitment to redefine industry innovation and competition in the Generative Economy [5][8]. - Daloz emphasizes the importance of maintaining the freedom necessary for Dassault Systèmes to remain a game-changer and accelerate growth [5][6]. Legacy and Future Direction - Bernard Charlès, as a co-founder, has been instrumental in guiding Dassault Systèmes from a startup to a world leader, fostering a culture of innovation and sustainability [4][9]. - The transition is seen as a strong foundation for the continued development of Dassault Systèmes, with a focus on high-quality standards and the successful engagement of the next generation of AI-based industry solutions [9].

Core Viewpoint - Dassault Systèmes announces the appointment of Pascal Daloz as both Chairman and Chief Executive Officer following the resignation of Bernard Charlès for personal reasons, ensuring continuity in leadership and governance [2][8]. Leadership Transition - Bernard Charlès has stepped down as Executive Chairman and member of the Board, effective immediately, citing personal reasons [2][8]. - Pascal Daloz, currently the CEO, will take on the additional role of Chairman, effective February 21, 2026, as recommended by the Compensation and Nomination Committee [2][3]. Vision and Strategy - Pascal Daloz expressed gratitude towards Bernard Charlès for his leadership and shared vision of transforming industries through innovation, particularly in the realm of Industrial AI and the 3D UNIV+RSES initiative [3][5]. - The company aims to redefine industry operations and competition in the Generative Economy, emphasizing a long-term commitment to innovation and growth [5][8]. Legacy and Future Direction - Bernard Charlès, as a co-founder, has been instrumental in guiding Dassault Systèmes from a startup to a global leader, fostering a culture of innovation and sustainability [4][9]. - The transition is seen as a strategic move to maintain trust among clients and ensure the company's successful development moving forward [6][9].