Group 1 - The company Tiancheng Holdings announced that its shares will resume trading on November 4, 2025, at 9:00 AM [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article reveals a complex financial case involving a significant loan of 11 billion yuan that has been under litigation for eight years, highlighting potential regulatory challenges and breaches of financial rules [4][46]. Group 1: Background of the Case - The case involves a bank, a real estate company, three loan entities, and 16 guarantors, including three listed companies and two delisted companies [3]. - The loan originated from a transaction where Huaming Equipment sold its subsidiary at a drastically reduced price due to legal risks associated with a borrowing dispute [5][6]. Group 2: Details of the Loan and Legal Proceedings - The loan dispute involves a principal amount of 2 billion yuan, with the plaintiff being Lanzhou Sanwei Huicheng Real Estate Co., and multiple defendants including the loan provider and several guarantors [7][9]. - The total amount in litigation across three loan disputes initiated by the plaintiff amounts to 11 billion yuan, with loan terms of three years [9]. Group 3: Investigation Findings - Investigations revealed that the loan entities had minimal registered capital and questionable operational legitimacy, raising concerns about their ability to secure such large loans [10][13][15]. - The connections between the loan entities and the involved parties, including the bank and the guarantors, suggest a web of financial maneuvering that may have circumvented standard banking practices [18][20]. Group 4: Implications for the Bank - The bank's actions in granting loans to these entities and subsequently transferring non-performing loans at face value to a third party raise questions about its risk management practices [22][39]. - The bank's high non-performing loan ratio and significant exposure to related parties indicate potential vulnerabilities in its financial health [41][42]. Group 5: Regulatory Concerns - The case has drawn scrutiny from regulatory bodies, with concerns about the bank's compliance with lending regulations and the integrity of its financial reporting [24][46]. - The selective litigation strategy employed by the plaintiff has been criticized for potentially skewing accountability among guarantors, raising ethical questions about the pursuit of financial recovery [27][28]. Group 6: Conclusion - The entire situation underscores systemic issues within the banking sector, including inadequate risk controls, governance failures, and potential exploitation of regulatory loopholes [46][47].

Core Viewpoint - The article reveals a complex financial scandal involving a bank, a real estate company, and multiple shell companies, highlighting potential regulatory breaches and challenges to financial rules [2][42]. Group 1: Background of the Case - A lawsuit has brought to light an 11 billion yuan loan that had been dormant for eight years, raising questions about regulatory compliance and the integrity of financial practices [2][6]. - The case involves three listed companies and two delisted companies, with significant financial implications for the parties involved [6][18]. Group 2: Details of the Loan and Companies Involved - The loan originated from Lanzhou Bank, which issued 11 billion yuan to three trade companies, all of which have questionable backgrounds and connections to a larger corporate restructuring [6][17]. - The companies involved, including Hangzhou Hexiu, Hangzhou Douang, and Hangzhou Mudong, have minimal registered capital and dubious operational legitimacy, raising concerns about the bank's lending practices [7][11][13]. Group 3: The Role of Guarantors and Legal Proceedings - The loan was backed by 16 guarantors, including several companies and individuals closely linked to the restructuring of Jianxin Group, which had previously filed for bankruptcy [16][24]. - The legal proceedings have seen multiple parties being sued, with allegations of selective accountability in the pursuit of repayment [24][28]. Group 4: Implications for Lanzhou Bank - Lanzhou Bank's actions, including the original loan issuance and subsequent debt transfer to a third party, have drawn scrutiny regarding its risk management and compliance with financial regulations [38][41]. - The bank's high non-performing loan ratio and significant exposure to related parties raise concerns about its financial health and governance practices [39][41]. Group 5: Broader Industry Concerns - The case highlights systemic issues within the banking sector, including potential erosion of credit rules and oversight, as well as the need for stricter regulations to prevent similar occurrences in the future [42].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a complex financial case involving a significant loan of 11 billion yuan that has been under litigation for eight years, revealing potential regulatory challenges and breaches of financial rules [5][50]. Group 1: Background of the Case - The case involves a bank, a real estate company, three loan entities, and 16 guarantors, including three listed companies and two delisted companies [2]. - The loan of 11 billion yuan originated in May 2017 from Lanzhou Bank, with multiple companies involved in the borrowing and guaranteeing process [10][20]. Group 2: Details of the Loan and Companies Involved - The loan was issued to three trade companies with minimal registered capital and questionable operational legitimacy, raising concerns about the bank's lending practices [11][14]. - The trade companies, including Hangzhou Hexiu, Hangzhou Douang, and Hangzhou Mudong, had connections to a larger corporate restructuring involving Jianxin Group, which had previously declared bankruptcy [20][22]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings and Debt Collection - The original creditor, Sanwei Huicheng Real Estate Co., acquired the debt from Lanzhou Bank at face value, despite the apparent risks associated with the non-performing loans [23][24]. - The legal actions taken by Sanwei Huicheng have led to multiple court hearings, with a focus on the responsibilities of various guarantors [29][31]. Group 4: Implications for Lanzhou Bank - Lanzhou Bank's role in the loan issuance and subsequent debt transfer raises questions about its risk management and compliance with financial regulations [44][45]. - The bank's high non-performing loan ratio and significant exposure to related parties indicate potential vulnerabilities in its financial health [46][47]. Group 5: Broader Industry Concerns - The case highlights systemic issues within the banking sector, including inadequate risk controls, governance failures, and potential regulatory evasion [51][52]. - The involvement of various parties in this financial web suggests a need for tighter regulations to prevent similar occurrences in the future [52].

关于贵州长征天成控股股份有限公司股票终止上市的公告 根据《股票上市规则》第9.1.15条的规定，贵州长征天成控股股份有限公司应当立即安排股票转入 全国中小企业股份转让系统等证券交易场所进行股份转让相关事宜，保证公司股票在摘牌之日起45个交 易日内可以转让。 如贵州长征天成控股股份有限公司对本所作出的终止上市决定不服，可以在本所公告本决定之日后 的5个交易日内，向本所申请复核。 上海证券交易所 2024年8月8日 上证公告（股退）【2024】051号 2024年6月24日至2024年7月19日，贵州长征天成控股股份有限公司连续20个交易日的每日股票收 盘价均低于1元，上述情形属于《上海证券交易所股票上市规则（2024年4月修订）》（以下简称《股票 上市规则》）第9.2.1条第一款第（一）项规定的股票终止上市情形。根据《股票上市规则》第9.1.10 条、第9.2.1条和第9.2.7条的规定，经上海证券交易所（以下简称本所）上市审核委员会审议，本所决定 终止贵州长征天成控股股份有限公司股票上市。 根据《股票上市规则》第9.1.14条、第9.2.9条和第9.6.1条的规定，贵州长征天成控股股份有限公司 股票不进入退市 ...

证券代码：600112 证券简称：*ST 天成 公告编号：临 2024-091 贵州长征天成控股股份有限公司 股票终止上市暨摘牌的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈 述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： 公司股票终止上市后，将进入全国中小企业股份转让系统有限责任公司依托原 证券公司代办股份转让系统设立并代为管理的两网公司及退市公司板块挂牌转让。 敬请广大投资者关注主办券商后续刊登在全国中小企业股份转让系统指定信息披 露平台（www.neeq.com.cn）的股份确权公告，尽快完成股份确权手续，并办理加 挂资金账户等交易结算手续。 贵州长征天成控股股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）于 2024 年 8 月 8 日收 到上海证券交易所（以下简称"上交所"）出具的《关于贵州长征天成控股股份有 限公司股票终止上市的决定》（上海证券交易所自律监管决定书〔2024〕102 号）， 上交所决定终止公司股票上市。 第一节 终止上市股票的证券种类、简称、代码、终止上市决定日期 公司终止上市不适用退市整理期的情形 终止上市暨摘牌日为 2024 年 8 ...

证券代码：600112 股票简称：*ST 天成 公告编号：临 2024－090 贵州长征天成控股股份有限公司 关于聘请主办券商的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担个别及连带责任。 一、聘请主办券商的情况说明 贵州长征天成控股股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）股票自 2024 年 6 月 24 日至 7 月 19 日已连续 20 个交易日每日收盘价均低于人民币 1 元，根据《上海 证券交易所股票上市规则》第 9.2.1 条第一款第一项的规定，在上海证券交易所 （以下简称"上交所"）仅发行 A 股股票的上市公司，如果公司股票连续 20 个交 易日的每日股票收盘价均低于 1 元，公司股票可能被上交所终止上市交易。公司 于 2024 年 7 月 21 日收到上交所下发的《关于拟终止贵州长征天成控股股份有限 公司股票上市的事先告知书》（上证公函【2024】0996 号），上交所将对公司股票 作出终止上市的决定。 根据《股票上市规则》第 9.1.15 条相关规定，公司股票被强制终止上市后， 公司应当聘请具有主办券商业务资格的证券公司 ...

重要内容提示： 证券代码：600112 股票简称：*ST 天成 公告编号：临 2024—089 贵州长征天成控股股份有限公司 关于涉及诉讼事项的进展公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担个别及连带责任。 ● 案件所处的诉讼阶段：二审已判决，再审申请已被驳回 ● 公司所处的当事人地位：再审申请人(一审被告、二审上诉人) ● 涉案金额：原告索赔金额30,658,020.83元；判决金额25,000,000元及利 息 ● 是否会对上市公司损益产生负面影响：案件执行后将对公司损益产生负 面影响，鉴于案件尚未执行完毕，暂无法判断对公司本期利润或期后利润的具体 影响。 贵州长征天成控股股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）分别于2023年4月15 日、2023年6月20日、2023年10月26日发布了《关于涉及诉讼的公告》（公告编号： 临2023—011）、《关于涉及诉讼事项的进展公告》（公告编号：临2023—030）、《关 于涉及诉讼事项的进展公告》（临2023—057），披露了公司与福建爱特点信息科 技有限公司（以下简称"爱特点公司"） ...

证券代码：600112 股票简称：*ST 天成 公告编号：临 2024-088 贵州长征天成控股股份有限公司 关于公司股票触及其他风险警示相关事项的进展公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈 述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担个别及连带责任。 特别提示： 贵州长征天成控股股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）因存在被原控股股东 银河天成集团有限公司（以下简称"银河集团"）及其关联方非经营性占用资金 及违规担保、以及公司 2020 年度内部控制被出具否定意见审计报告等情形，根 据上海证券交易所《股票上市规则》的相关规定，公司股票已被实施其他风险警 示，详见公司于指定信息披露媒体上披露的相关公告。 鉴于公司存在的非经营性占用资金及违规担保尚未解决、2023 年度内部控 制被出具无法表示意见审计报告、最近连续三个会计年度扣除非经常性损益前后 净利润孰低者为负值的情形、最近一个会计年度财务会计报告的审计报告显示公 司持续经营能力存在重大不确定性。根据上海证券交易所《股票上市规则》的相 关规定，公司股票继续被实施其他风险警示。现将相关事项的进展情况公告如下： 一、关于股东非 ...

证券代码：600112 股票简称：*ST 天成 公告编号：临 2024－087 贵州长征天成控股股份有限公司 关于立案调查进展暨风险提示的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担个别及连带责任。 贵州长征天成控股股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）于 2024 年 1 月 16 日 收到中国证券监督管理委员会（以下简称"中国证监会"）的《立案告知书》（编 号：证监立案字 0312024001 号），因涉嫌信息披露违法违规，根据《中华人民共 和国证券法》、《中华人民共和国行政处罚法》等法律法规，2024 年 1 月 16 日， 中国证监会决定对公司立案，具体详见公司于 2024 年 1 月 17 日在指定信息披露 媒体上披露的《关于收到中国证券监督管理委员会立案告知书的公告》（公告编 号：临 2024-001）。 截至目前，中国证监会的调查尚在进行中，公司尚未收到就上述立案调查事 项的结论性意见或决定。在调查期间，公司将积极配合中国证监会的调查工作， 并严格按照相关要求履行信息披露义务。 公司指定信息披露媒体为《证券时报》、《中国 ...