Workflow
Integral Ad Science (IAS)
icon
Search documents
IAS ALERT: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is Investigating Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. on Behalf of Long-Term Stockholders and Encourages Investors to Contact the Firm
GlobeNewswire News Room· 2025-04-02 01:00
Core Viewpoint - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is investigating potential claims against Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (IAS) on behalf of long-term stockholders following a class action complaint filed against IAS, alleging breaches of fiduciary duties by the board of directors [1][2] Summary by Relevant Sections Class Action Complaint - The complaint alleges that during the Class Period from March 2, 2023, to February 27, 2024, IAS misrepresented and failed to disclose significant competitive pricing pressures, leading to price cuts due to weakening demand and slowing revenue growth [2] - It is claimed that IAS's pricing function was no longer favorable, affecting its ability to sustain pricing and drive price increases, which became a key differentiator in closing major renewals and new deals [2] - The complaint states that the risk of increased pricing pressure from competition had materialized, resulting in materially false and misleading public statements from IAS [2] - As a result of these alleged wrongful acts, the market value of IAS shares declined significantly, causing losses for the plaintiff and potential class members [2] Law Firm Background - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm with offices in New York and California, representing individual and institutional investors in various complex litigations [3]
IAS DEADLINE TODAY: ROSEN, A LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important March 31 Deadline in Securities Class Action - IAS
GlobeNewswire News Room· 2025-03-31 16:24
Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased common stock of Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: IAS) during the Class Period from March 2, 2023, to February 27, 2024, about the lead plaintiff deadline of March 31, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought IAS common stock during the Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [2][5] - The lead plaintiff must file a motion with the Court by March 31, 2025, to represent other class members in the litigation [2] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [3] - The firm was ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for the number of settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [3] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, and its founding partner was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020 [3] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that IAS failed to disclose significant competitive pricing pressures, leading to price cuts due to weakening demand and slowing revenue growth [4] - It is claimed that IAS's pricing function was no longer favorable, and the company could not sustain its pricing or drive price increases [4] - The lawsuit asserts that IAS's public statements were materially false and misleading, resulting in investor damages when the true details were revealed [4]
INVESTOR ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action Lawsuit Against Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. – IAS
GlobeNewswire News Room· 2025-03-30 12:00
Then, on February 27, 2024, IAS reported financial results for the fourth quarter of 2023 and issued revenue guidance below analyst expectations. On an earnings call later that day, the Company admitted that these disappointing revenue numbers resulted from pricing cuts issued to customers across the Company's measurement and optimization businesses. Chief Executive Officer Lisa Utzschneider stated that "[w]e are seeing more competitive pricing in measurement on a select group of large contract renewals in ...
Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. Sued for Securities Law Violations - Contact Levi & Korsinsky Before March 31, 2025 to Discuss Your Rights - IAS
Prnewswire· 2025-03-28 09:45
Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. alleging securities fraud affecting investors between March 2, 2023, and February 27, 2024 [1] Group 1: Allegations of Fraud - The lawsuit claims that Integral Ad Science concealed significant competitive pricing pressures, leading to forced price cuts due to weakening demand and slowing revenue growth [2] - It is alleged that the company's pricing function was no longer favorable, impacting its ability to sustain pricing and drive price increases [2] - The complaint states that pricing had become a critical differentiator necessary for closing major renewals and new deals, which was not disclosed [2] - The risks associated with increased pricing pressure from competition were realized, contradicting the company's public statements [2] Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until March 31, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require this role [3] - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees, indicating no financial obligation to participate [3] Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has been recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the U.S. for seven consecutive years [4]
March 31, 2025 Deadline: Contact Levi & Korsinsky to Join Class Action Suit Against IAS
GlobeNewswire News Room· 2025-03-27 16:42
Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. for alleged securities fraud affecting investors between March 2, 2023, and February 27, 2024 [1]. Group 1: Allegations of Fraud - The lawsuit claims that Integral Ad Science made false statements regarding its competitive pricing pressures, which led to a need to cut prices due to weakening demand and slowing revenue growth [2]. - It is alleged that the company's pricing function was no longer favorable, impacting its ability to sustain pricing and drive price increases [2]. - The complaint indicates that pricing had become a critical differentiator necessary for closing major renewals and new deals, contradicting previous public statements [2]. - The risks associated with increased pricing pressure from competition were realized, making the company's public statements materially false and misleading [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until March 31, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require this role [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees, indicating no financial obligation to participate [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has been recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States for seven consecutive years [4].
IAS Deadline in 5 Days: Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP Reminds Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (IAS) Investors of Filing Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit
GlobeNewswire News Room· 2025-03-26 15:44
Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (IAS) for allegedly making false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and financial prospects during the class period from March 2, 2023, to February 27, 2024 [1]. Group 1: Allegations Against IAS - The lawsuit claims that IAS faced increased competitive pricing pressures, leading to price cuts due to weakening demand and slowing revenue growth [3]. - It is alleged that IAS's pricing function was no longer favorable, and the company could not sustain its pricing or drive price increases [3]. - The complaint states that pricing had become a key differentiator between IAS and its competitors, and favorable pricing was necessary to secure major renewals and new deals [3]. - The risk of increased pricing pressure from competition was realized, contradicting IAS's previous statements about its business and operations [3]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors in IAS have until March 31, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff representatives in the class action lawsuit [4]. - A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all class members and is typically the investor or group of investors with the largest financial interest [4]. - Investors can choose to participate actively or remain absent class members without affecting their ability to share in any recovery [4].
The Gross Law Firm Reminds Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. Investors of the Pending Class Action Lawsuit with a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of March 31, 2025 – IAS
GlobeNewswire News Room· 2025-03-26 14:55
NEW YORK, March 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Gross Law Firm issues the following notice to shareholders of Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: IAS). Shareholders who purchased shares of IAS during the class period listed are encouraged to contact the firm regarding possible lead plaintiff appointment. Appointment as lead plaintiff is not required to partake in any recovery. CONTACT US HERE: https://securitiesclasslaw.com/securities/integral-ad-science-loss-submission-form/?id=138490&from=3 CLASS ...
Important March 31, 2025 Deadline Reminder: Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP Reminds Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. Investors of Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuit
Prnewswire· 2025-03-26 01:04
Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (IAS) for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and financial performance during the Class Period from March 2, 2023, to February 27, 2024 [1] Allegations of Misconduct - The complaint alleges that IAS faced increased competitive pricing pressures, leading to price cuts due to weakening demand and slowing revenue growth [2] - It is claimed that IAS's pricing function was no longer favorable, impacting its ability to sustain pricing or drive price increases [2] - The lawsuit states that pricing had become a key differentiator between IAS and its competitors, necessitating favorable pricing to secure major renewals and new deals [2] - The risk of increased pricing pressure from competition was realized, contradicting previous statements made by IAS [2] - As a result, the statements made by IAS regarding its business, operations, and prospects were deemed materially false and misleading [2] Lead Plaintiff Process - IAS investors have until March 31, 2025, to seek appointment as a lead plaintiff representative of the class through Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP or other counsel [3] - A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all class members and is typically the investor or small group of investors with the largest financial interest [3] - The decision to serve as a lead plaintiff does not affect the ability to share in any recovery [3]
Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. Sued for Securities Law Violations - Investors Should Contact Levi & Korsinsky Before March 31, 2025 to Discuss Your Rights - IAS
Prnewswire· 2025-03-25 16:52
Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. alleging securities fraud that affected investors between March 2, 2023, and February 27, 2024 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations of Fraud - The lawsuit claims that Integral Ad Science concealed significant competitive pricing pressures, leading to necessary price cuts due to weakening demand and slowing revenue growth [2]. - It is alleged that the company's pricing function was no longer favorable, impacting its ability to sustain pricing and drive increases [2]. - The complaint states that pricing had become a critical differentiator for closing major renewals and new deals, which was not disclosed to investors [2]. - The risks associated with increased pricing pressure from competition were realized, contradicting the company's public statements [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until March 31, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require this role [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without incurring any out-of-pocket costs or fees, with no obligation to participate [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and is recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States [4].
Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. Investors: Please contact the Portnoy Law Firm to recover your losses; March 31, 2025 Deadline to file Lead Plaintiff Motion
Globenewswire· 2025-03-24 23:53
Core Viewpoint - Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (IAS) is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged misrepresentations regarding its pricing strategy and competitive pressures during the specified class period from March 2, 2023, to February 27, 2024 [1][3]. Group 1: Legal Action - Investors who purchased IAS securities during the class period can file a lead plaintiff motion by March 31, 2025 [1]. - The Portnoy Law Firm is offering a complimentary case evaluation for investors to discuss their legal rights and options for recovering losses [2]. Group 2: Allegations Against IAS - The complaint alleges that IAS misrepresented key issues, including the emergence of significant competitive pricing pressures that forced the company to lower prices due to weaker demand and slower revenue growth [3]. - It is claimed that IAS's pricing strategy was no longer advantageous, impacting its ability to maintain or raise prices as previously expected [3]. - The complaint also states that pricing had become a critical factor in differentiating IAS from competitors, which was essential for securing major renewals and new contracts [3]. - Furthermore, it is alleged that the risks of increased competition leading to pricing pressures had already materialized, rendering IAS's public statements during this period materially false and misleading [3].