Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against PubMatic, Inc. for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and prospects during the Class Period from February 27, 2025, to August 11, 2025 [5]. Allegation Details - The lawsuit claims that PubMatic failed to disclose significant adverse facts, including a top Demand-Side Platform (DSP) buyer shifting clients to a new platform, leading to a reduction in ad spend and revenue [5]. - The complaint highlights that the positive statements made by PubMatic regarding its business were misleading and lacked a reasonable basis due to these undisclosed issues [5]. Financial Impact - Following the release of its second quarter 2025 financial report on August 11, 2025, which revealed a reduction in ad spend from a top DSP partner, PubMatic's stock price fell by $2.23, or 21.1%, closing at $8.34 per share on August 12, 2025 [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased PubMatic, Inc. securities during the specified class period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is from February 27, 2025, to August 11, 2025, inclusive [1]. - Investors who purchased PubMatic securities during this period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the court to serve as lead plaintiff by October 20, 2025 [2]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [3]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements in the past, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [3]. - In 2019, Rosen Law Firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in recovering funds for clients [3]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that during the class period, PubMatic made false and misleading statements regarding its business operations [4]. - Key issues include a top demand side platform buyer shifting clients to a new platform, leading to a reduction in ad spend and revenue for PubMatic [4]. - The misleading statements resulted in investor damages when the true details became public [4].

Core Insights - The partnership between PubMatic and MNTN democratizes access to premium Connected TV (CTV) advertising for performance-focused marketers, resulting in a 10% revenue uplift for publishers due to a 14% increase in unique advertiser demand [1][6][11] Group 1: Partnership Impact - The collaboration provides MNTN's self-serve Performance TV platform with direct access to top-tier streaming publishers, enhancing the advertising landscape for marketers [1][5] - MNTN's customer base is largely new to CTV, with 97% of advertisers being entirely new participants, indicating significant market expansion [1][6] - The partnership addresses critical growth challenges for publishers by expanding revenue sources beyond traditional advertiser segments while maintaining brand safety and inventory quality [6][7] Group 2: Market Opportunity - The U.S. CTV ad spend is projected to reach $36.87 billion by 2025, presenting a substantial growth opportunity, particularly for small and mid-size businesses [8] - A significant portion of advertisers (73%) view measurement and attribution as top challenges in CTV, while 68% require transparency in ad placements, which this partnership aims to resolve [9][10] Group 3: Value Creation - MNTN's platform offers auto-optimized CTV campaigns that provide accountability, while PubMatic ensures transparent supply-path connections, enhancing advertiser confidence [4][5] - The partnership allows publishers to achieve sustainable revenue growth from previously inaccessible advertiser segments, diversifying income streams without cannibalizing existing demand [7][11]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against PubMatic, Inc. for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and financial outlook during the class period from February 27, 2025, to August 11, 2025 [6]. Allegation Details - The lawsuit claims that PubMatic failed to disclose significant adverse facts, including a top Demand-Side Platform (DSP) buyer shifting clients to a new platform, resulting in reduced ad spend and revenue for PubMatic [6]. - The company's positive statements about its business were deemed materially misleading due to these undisclosed issues [6]. Financial Impact - Following the release of its second quarter 2025 financial report on August 11, 2025, which acknowledged a reduction in ad spend from a top DSP partner, PubMatic's stock price fell by $2.23, or 21.1%, closing at $8.34 per share on August 12, 2025 [6].

Core Viewpoint - PubMatic, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit due to significant stock price decline following disappointing financial results and a warning of reduced revenue from a key partner [1][3][4] Financial Performance - On August 11, 2025, PubMatic reported its second-quarter 2025 financial results, indicating a headwind from a major DSP buyer that shifted clients to a new platform [3] - The company anticipates a significant revenue decline in the third quarter due to reduced ad spending from one of its top DSP partners [3] Stock Market Reaction - Following the financial announcement, PubMatic's stock price fell by $2.23 per share, approximately 21.1%, closing at $8.34 per share on August 12, 2025 [4] Legal Action - The Portnoy Law Firm is advising investors who purchased PubMatic securities between February 27, 2025, and August 11, 2025, to consider filing a lead plaintiff motion by October 20, 2025 [1][2]

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against PubMatic, Inc. for alleged securities fraud affecting investors between February 27, 2025, and August 11, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The complaint alleges that defendants made false statements and concealed information regarding a significant shift of clients from a top demand side platform buyer to a new platform, which evaluated inventory differently [2]. - As a result of this shift, PubMatic experienced a reduction in ad spend and revenue from this buyer, leading to misleading positive statements about the Company's business and prospects [2]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until October 20, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require serving as lead plaintiff [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky has a 20-year history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and is recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States [4].

Core Insights - PubMatic is leveraging AI technology to enhance its programmatic advertising model, aiming to break down traditional barriers in the digital advertising space [3][6] - The integration of Nvidia's technology has led to significant improvements in processing speed and performance, making PubMatic's system competitive against those requiring substantial technology investments [3][7] Performance Improvements - The new system reduces inference latency from the industry standard of 5-10 milliseconds to approximately 1 millisecond, resulting in 85% fewer auction timeouts [4] - AI-powered decision-making algorithms allow for responses to programmatic opportunities in microseconds, significantly faster than traditional systems [5] - The system processes live campaign data twice as fast and delivers insights 60% more quickly, enabling real-time responses to advertising opportunities [5] Energy Efficiency - PubMatic's system claims to reduce energy consumption by 30%, contributing to more sustainable operations in the ad-tech industry [5] AI Integration and Innovations - The company has invested heavily in AI, launching an overhauled system that incorporates generative and agentic AI capabilities for deal simplification, forecasting, and optimization [6] - A new Live Sports Marketplace has been introduced to address the challenges of advertising during live events, accommodating rapid audience surges [6] Collaboration with Nvidia - The partnership with Nvidia has resulted in processing speeds that are up to five times faster than traditional systems, enhancing the overall efficiency of automated programmatic ad buying [7] - This collaboration aims to create AI-powered solutions that enable publishers to achieve performance levels previously only possible within walled gardens [7]

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against PubMatic, Inc. due to alleged violations of federal securities laws, encouraging affected investors to contact them for legal options [1][3]. Group 1: Allegations Against PubMatic - The complaint alleges that PubMatic and its executives made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose significant issues, including a top DSP buyer shifting clients to a new platform, leading to reduced ad spend and revenue [3]. - The company's positive statements regarding its business operations and prospects were deemed materially misleading and lacked a reasonable basis due to these undisclosed issues [3]. Group 2: Financial Impact - On August 11, 2025, PubMatic's CFO disclosed a reduction in ad spend from a top DSP partner, which was a significant factor affecting the company's outlook [4]. - Following this announcement, PubMatic's stock price dropped by $2.23, or 21.1%, closing at $8.34 per share on August 12, 2025, amid unusually high trading volume [4]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - The deadline for investors to seek the role of lead plaintiff in the federal securities class action against PubMatic is October 20, 2025 [1]. - Any member of the putative class can move the court to serve as lead plaintiff or remain an absent class member without affecting their ability to share in any recovery [5].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against PubMatic, Inc. due to allegations of misleading statements and failure to disclose significant changes affecting the company's revenue and operations [3][5]. Group 1: Legal Investigation - The firm is reminding investors of the October 20, 2025 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action against PubMatic [3]. - The investigation focuses on claims that PubMatic and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false or misleading statements regarding the company's business and revenue [5]. Group 2: Financial Impact - Following the release of PubMatic's second quarter 2025 financial report on August 11, 2025, the company's stock price fell by $2.23, or 21.1%, closing at $8.34 per share on August 12, 2025, amid heavy trading volume [6]. - The financial report revealed a reduction in ad spend from a top demand-side platform (DSP) partner, which significantly impacted the company's outlook [6]. Group 3: Company Statements - PubMatic's CFO indicated that the company would need to prioritize its ad impressions due to changes in inventory evaluation by a top DSP buyer [6]. - The CEO acknowledged the challenges posed by the shift of clients to a new platform that evaluates inventory differently, which has created significant headwinds for the company [6].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased PubMatic, Inc. securities between February 27, 2025, and August 11, 2025, about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline of October 20, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought PubMatic securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by the October 20, 2025 deadline [2]. - The lawsuit alleges that PubMatic made false and misleading statements regarding its business operations, particularly related to a significant demand side platform buyer shifting clients to a new platform, leading to reduced ad spend and revenue [4]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own success in recovering hundreds of millions for investors [3]. - The firm achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements since 2013 [3]. - In 2019, Rosen Law Firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability and experience in handling such cases [3].