RT ArchAI Viking (◉ - ◉) (@badviking1995)GM LEGENDS☀️𝗦𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗣𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗛𝗲𝗹𝗽 𝗠𝗲 𝗚𝗲𝘁 𝗢𝘂𝘁 𝗢𝗳 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗙𝘃𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗦𝗻𝗮𝗽 𝗝𝗮𝗶𝗹 🤬Day starts but I’m still stuck in Snap Jail 😩Only +0.05 SNAPS (24h) … bruhhh 🤯Leaderboard rank: #217Total: 17.93 SNAPS@cookiedotfun @recallnet set me free already 😅#SnapSeason #gRecall #OnChainAI ...

Core Insights - ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok, has a valuation exceeding $300 billion, with a recent $14 billion deal for its US division, raising questions about its true worth given its significant growth over the past five years [1][10][11] Company Valuation - The valuation of TikTok is considered low compared to its revenue potential, as it reportedly generates four to five times the revenue of Snap, which has a $15 billion enterprise value [2][10] - There are speculations that bids for TikTok could exceed $40 billion, indicating strong interest from potential buyers [2][3] Algorithm Ownership and Value - The value of TikTok is heavily tied to its algorithm, with concerns about who will own it post-deal and how effective a leased version would be [4][7] - Oracle's involvement is seen as strategic, given its historical relationship with TikTok as a major customer for cloud services [5][6] Market Dynamics - The deal is perceived as favorable for Oracle, aligning with US regulatory dynamics, although it does not guarantee approval from Chinese authorities [6] - The differing use cases of TikTok and Snap are highlighted, with TikTok focusing on content consumption and Snap on messaging, suggesting distinct market positions [8][9] Advertising Revenue Potential - TikTok's revenue streams include advertising and e-commerce, positioning it as a preferred platform for creators, which enhances its market value [12]

NEW YORK, Sept. 25, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Snap Inc. (NYSE: SNAP) between April 29, 2025 and August 5, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), both dates inclusive, of the important October 20, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased Snap securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arran ...

NEW YORK, Sept. 25, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Snap Inc. ("Snap" or the "Company") (NYSE: SNAP) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of Snap investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between April 29, 2025 and August 5, 2025. Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team: https://zlk.com/pslra-1/snap-inc-lawsuit-submission-form-2?prid=168 ...

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Snap Inc. and certain senior executives, alleging misleading representations regarding its digital advertising platform and growth prospects, following a significant decline in stock price after Q2 financial results [1][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims Snap provided false assurances about the effectiveness of its advertising platform and its revenue-driving potential, while actually facing negative impacts from a major "execution error" related to recent changes in the ad platform [4]. - The alleged misleading information became apparent on August 5, 2025, when Snap reported Q2 2025 results, missing analyst estimates for GAAP EPS and revealing a drastic slowdown in ad revenue growth from 9% in Q1 to just 1% in April [5]. Group 2: Financial Impact - Following the Q2 report, Snap's stock price dropped approximately 17% the next day due to the disclosed issues with its advertising platform and revenue growth [5]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Hagens Berman, a law firm, is investigating the case and encouraging investors who suffered losses to come forward, questioning whether Snap misled investors about the ad platform changes that led to revenue deceleration and share price decline [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Snap, Inc. for allegedly misleading investors regarding its advertising revenue growth, which significantly declined from 9% to 1% during the specified period [2][7]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of all individuals and entities who purchased Snap securities between April 29, 2025, and August 5, 2025, inclusive [2]. - Investors have until October 20, 2025, to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [2]. Group 2: Allegations - The complaint alleges that Snap provided overly positive statements while concealing material adverse facts about its advertising revenue growth [7]. - Snap's advertising revenue growth rate reportedly declined from 9% in the first quarter to only 1% in April due to execution failures [7]. Group 3: Financial Impact - On August 5, 2025, Snap announced a deceleration in advertising revenue growth, attributing it to issues with its ad platform and other factors [7]. - Following this announcement, Snap's stock price fell from $9.39 per share to $7.78 per share on August 6, 2025, marking a decline of approximately 17.15% in one day [7].

Core Viewpoint - Class action lawsuits have been filed on behalf of shareholders of several publicly-traded companies, alleging that these companies made materially false and misleading statements regarding their business operations and prospects [1]. Group 1: PubMatic, Inc. (NASDAQ: PUBM) - The class period for PubMatic is from February 27, 2025, to August 11, 2025, with a lead plaintiff deadline of October 20, 2025 [2]. - Allegations include failure to disclose a significant shift of clients to a new platform by a top DSP buyer, resulting in reduced ad spend and revenue for PubMatic [2]. - Defendants' positive statements about the company's business were deemed materially misleading and lacked a reasonable basis [2]. Group 2: Snap Inc. (NYSE: SNAP) - The class period for Snap is from April 29, 2025, to August 5, 2025, with a lead plaintiff deadline of October 20, 2025 [3]. - The complaint alleges that Snap's optimistic reports on advertising growth were misleading, as they relied too heavily on the company's execution capabilities [3]. - Defendants failed to disclose significant execution errors and macroeconomic challenges, leading to materially misleading statements about the company's prospects [3]. Group 3: Nutex Health Inc. (NASDAQ: NUTX) - The class period for Nutex is from August 8, 2024, to August 14, 2025, with a lead plaintiff deadline of October 21, 2025 [4]. - Allegations include engaging in a scheme to defraud insurance companies, leading to unsustainable revenue claims [4]. - The company overstated its ability to remediate internal control weaknesses, resulting in improper accounting of stock-based compensation obligations [4]. Group 4: C3.ai, Inc. (NYSE: AI) - The class period for C3.ai is from February 26, 2025, to August 8, 2025, with a lead plaintiff deadline of October 21, 2025 [6]. - The complaint alleges that the company's optimistic growth reports were misleading, relying heavily on the CEO's health and effectiveness [6]. - Defendants failed to disclose that the CEO had not sufficiently recovered to fulfill his role, leading to materially misleading statements about the company's prospects [6].

格隆汇9月23日｜沙特投资者瓦利德王子(Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Al Saud)增持社交媒体公司Snap 1520 万股股票，持股数增至4080万股，持股比例达2.8%。70岁的瓦利德王子在电邮中承认增持该股，但未 透露购买动机或成交价格，按上周五收市价计算，此次购入股份价值约1.2亿美元。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Snap Inc. securities between April 29, 2025, and August 5, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on October 20, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Snap securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by October 20, 2025 [3]. - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4]. Group 2: Case Background - The lawsuit alleges that Snap's management misled investors by presenting an overly optimistic view of the company's advertising revenue and growth potential while downplaying significant execution errors [5]. - The lawsuit claims that when the true situation regarding Snap's performance became known, investors suffered damages due to the misleading information provided during the Class Period [5].

Core Insights - Artificial intelligence (AI) is identified as the greatest investment opportunity of the current era, with a strong emphasis on the urgency to invest in AI technologies now [1][13] - The energy demands of AI technologies are highlighted, with data centers consuming as much energy as small cities, leading to concerns about power grid strain and rising electricity prices [2][3] Investment Opportunity - A specific company is presented as a unique investment opportunity, positioned to benefit from the increasing energy demands of AI, owning critical energy infrastructure assets [3][6][7] - This company is described as a "toll booth" operator in the AI energy boom, collecting fees from energy exports and poised to capitalize on the onshoring trend driven by tariffs [5][6] Financial Position - The company is noted for being debt-free and holding a significant cash reserve, equating to nearly one-third of its market capitalization, which positions it favorably compared to other energy firms burdened with debt [8][10] - It also has a substantial equity stake in another AI-related company, providing indirect exposure to multiple growth engines in the AI sector [9][10] Market Trends - The article discusses the broader trends of AI infrastructure supercycles, the onshoring boom, and a surge in U.S. LNG exports, indicating a favorable environment for the company's growth [14] - The influx of talent into the AI sector is expected to drive continuous innovation and advancements, reinforcing the potential for investment in AI-related companies [12] Conclusion - The narrative concludes with a strong call to action for investors to engage in the AI market, emphasizing the potential for significant returns within a 12 to 24-month timeframe [15][19]