Grok 4.20 is BASED.The only AI that doesn’t equivocate when asked if America is on stolen land.The others are weak sauce. https://t.co/KEz4MPy2YB ...

RT Mark Kretschmann (@mark_k)The currently released Grok 4.20 is the "small" version with 500B parameters.Medium and Large versions of Grok 4.20 will follow later from @xai. ...

The Spanish government is requesting that prosecutors investigate X, Meta Platforms and TikTok, saying the social-media platforms might be abetting the creation and dissemination of child pornography through artificial intelligence https://t.co/7OxdqSzRbb ...

Predicting the future accurately is the best measure of intelligenceX Freeze (@XFreeze):The Grok 4.20 model that was crushing multiple AI leaderboards in predicting the future is officially released:🏆 #1 on Alpha Arena – 35% returns in 10 days, holding 4 of the top 6 spots simultaneously🏆 #1 on PredictionArena – Dominating real-money prediction markets🏆 #2 ...

The Grok 4.2 release candidate (public beta) is now available for use. You need to select it specifically.Critical feedback is appreciated. Unlike prior versions of Grok, 4.2 is able to learn rapidly, so there will be improvements every week with release notes. ...

RT X Daily News (@xDaily)NEWS: xAI now employs nearly 3,000 people in the Memphis area — electricians, engineers, cooks, and construction workers — as Colossus continues to scale.https://t.co/2e8f2P6kjT ...

Core Viewpoint - European countries are increasing regulatory pressure on social media companies in response to public protests regarding child safety, which may provoke a strong backlash from the United States, as major tech firms like Facebook and X (formerly Twitter) are American companies [1][9]. Regulatory Actions - Following the UK, Spain has ordered an investigation into Meta, X, and TikTok for allegedly disseminating AI-generated child pornography [1]. - Ireland has also initiated an investigation into X's AI chatbot Grok, focusing on its handling of personal data and the generation of harmful pornographic images [1]. - Several European nations, including France, Spain, Greece, Denmark, Slovenia, and the Czech Republic, are proposing to ban social media use among minors due to rising concerns over internet addiction, cyberbullying, and declining academic performance [1][10]. Political Context - Germany and the UK are considering similar measures, reflecting political urgency and disappointment with the EU's response speed and effectiveness [2][10]. - The EU's Digital Services Act (DSA), effective in 2024, allows for fines of up to 6% of global annual revenue for large platforms failing to curb illegal or harmful content [3][11]. - The enforcement of such penalties poses political risks, with former President Trump threatening tariffs and sanctions against EU countries that impose new tech taxes or target American companies [3][11]. Geopolitical Tensions - French President Macron has characterized the U.S. resistance to European regulation as a "geopolitical struggle" [5][13]. - Spain's Consumer Affairs Minister stated that the country's actions aim to reduce digital dependence on the U.S. and address platforms that undermine European democracy [6][14]. Independent Actions by Countries - Denmark's Digitalization Ministry noted that modifications to the DSA guidelines allow countries to establish age restriction laws, prompting independent actions [7][15]. - Spain's proposal to ban social media for individuals under 16 was influenced by the Grok incident involving non-consensual images of minors [7][15]. - Macron's push for a potential EU-wide ban on social media for minors was catalyzed by a violent incident involving a student [7][15]. - Greek Prime Minister Mitsotakis expressed that reading Jonathan Haidt's "The Coddling of the American Mind" was an eye-opening experience regarding the impact of smartphones and social media on children's brains [8][16].

Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit by Baba Ramdev against social media platforms X (formerly Twitter) and Meta Platforms centers on the alleged misappropriation and commercial exploitation of his personality, image, and identity through various online channels, raising significant issues regarding personality rights and freedom of speech [1][7]. Group 1: Legal Arguments and Perspectives - Counsel for X argued against the indiscriminate blocking of accounts in personality rights cases, emphasizing that such actions can have a chilling effect on freedom of speech, particularly when the content in question is not egregious [1][10]. - The defense highlighted that a meme referenced in the lawsuit was satire, which is protected under democratic principles, asserting that satire and public speech should not violate personality rights [2][10]. - Counsel for Meta Platforms supported the notion that while egregious content can be removed, there should be evidence of tangible monetization by third parties before global blocking orders are issued [5][10]. Group 2: Content and Impact - Ramdev's lawsuit claims that social media platforms have allowed the circulation of AI-generated deepfake videos and doctored images that exploit his personality, infringing on his publicity rights and violating his fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution [7][9]. - The lawsuit argues that the ongoing dissemination of infringing materials poses a risk of irreversible dilution of Ramdev's spiritual persona, necessitating heightened protection for the identity of spiritual leaders [8][9]. - Both X and Meta Platforms acknowledged the removal of certain offending content, but raised concerns about the implications of personality rights claims on fair reporting, particularly regarding news organizations [6][10].

Company News - The Irish regulatory authority has launched an investigation into the social media platform X, owned by Elon Musk [1]

The European Union's data privacy watchdog has launched an investigation into Elon Musk's X over sexualized images generated by the social media site's AI chatbot, Grok. https://t.co/qPF80d7sBq https://t.co/37lGBikEGj ...