Core Viewpoint - Investors in the Medical - Instruments sector may find value in either Globus Medical (GMED) or Masimo (MASI), with a closer examination needed to determine which stock is more appealing to value investors [1] Valuation Metrics - Both GMED and MASI currently hold a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating positive revisions to their earnings estimates and improving earnings outlooks [3] - The Value category assesses undervalued companies using key metrics such as P/E ratio, P/S ratio, earnings yield, and cash flow per share [4] - GMED has a forward P/E ratio of 22.92 and a PEG ratio of 1.45, while MASI has a forward P/E of 30.36 and a PEG ratio of 1.77 [5] - GMED's P/B ratio is 2.77, contrasting with MASI's P/B of 11.61, indicating GMED is more favorably valued [6] - Based on these valuation metrics, GMED is rated with a Value grade of B, while MASI has a Value grade of D, suggesting GMED is the superior value option [6]

Group 1: Company Performance - Superior Group (SGC) closed at $10.22, reflecting a -1.73% change from the previous day, underperforming the S&P 500's gain of 0.1% [1] - Prior to the latest trading session, shares of Superior Group had increased by 2.56%, outperforming the Consumer Discretionary sector's decline of 2.88% and the S&P 500's drop of 1.43% [1] Group 2: Upcoming Earnings - Superior Group is expected to report earnings of $0.2 per share, indicating a year-over-year growth of 53.85% [2] - The consensus estimate for revenue is projected at $144.32 million, which represents a 0.75% decrease from the same quarter last year [2] Group 3: Annual Estimates - For the annual period, earnings are anticipated to be $0.43 per share, with revenue expected to reach $563.93 million, reflecting declines of -41.1% and -0.31% respectively from the previous year [3] - Recent modifications to analyst estimates are crucial as they reflect current business trends, with positive revisions indicating analyst optimism [3] Group 4: Valuation Metrics - Superior Group has a Forward P/E ratio of 13.68, which is lower than the industry average of 19.21, suggesting it is trading at a discount [6] - The company has a PEG ratio of 1.37, compared to the industry average of 2.29, indicating a more favorable valuation relative to expected earnings growth [7] Group 5: Industry Ranking - The Textile - Apparel industry, which includes Superior Group, holds a Zacks Industry Rank of 67, placing it in the top 28% of over 250 industries [7] - The strength of industry groups is measured by the Zacks Industry Rank, with top-rated industries outperforming lower-rated ones by a factor of 2 to 1 [8]

Market Overview - The U.S. stock market showed subdued performance, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average increasing by 0.11% to 49,071.56, while the S&P 500 decreased by 0.13% to 6,969.01, and the Nasdaq Composite fell by 0.72% to 23,685.12 [1] - The technology sector experienced a significant sell-off, particularly in Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) shares, due to concerns over slower cloud growth, although Meta provided some offsetting strength [2] Value Stocks Analysis - Value stocks are highlighted as appealing investment opportunities amid cautious market sentiment, driven by rising oil prices and geopolitical tensions [2] - The Price to Cash Flow (P/CF) ratio is emphasized as an effective valuation metric, indicating that a lower P/CF ratio suggests better value and strong cash generation potential [3][4] - Analysts note that cash flow is a more reliable indicator of a company's financial health compared to earnings, which can be influenced by accounting estimates and management manipulation [5] Investment Strategy - A comprehensive investment strategy should include multiple valuation metrics such as price-to-book ratio, price-to-earnings ratio, and price-to-sales ratio, alongside a favorable Zacks Rank and Value Score [7] - Parameters for selecting true-value stocks include a P/CF ratio less than or equal to the industry median, a minimum stock price of $5, and an average 20-day trading volume greater than 100,000 [8] Selected Value Stocks - Four companies—Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc. (HRMY), Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS), Concentrix Corporation (CNXC), and Global Payments Inc. (GPN)—meet strict value criteria, showing low P/CF ratios and solid financial health [9] - Each of these companies is projected to grow both sales and earnings per share (EPS) in the current financial year, with all carrying a Value Score of A and demonstrating consistent positive earnings surprises [9] Company-Specific Insights - Harmony Biosciences is projected to see sales growth of 21.4% and EPS growth of 25.9% for the current financial year, despite a 4.9% decline in share price over the past year [13] - Universal Health Services anticipates sales growth of 9.7% and EPS growth of 31.3%, with shares rising by 6.1% in the past year [14] - Concentrix Corporation expects sales growth of 2.9% and EPS growth of 4.8%, although its shares have dropped by 26.1% in the past year [15] - Global Payments forecasts sales growth of 1.8% and EPS growth of 5.8%, with shares declining by 36.8% over the past year [16]

Core Viewpoint - The article compares Oddity Tech (ODD) and Adyen N.V. Unsponsored ADR (ADYEY) to determine which stock is more attractive to value investors [1] Group 1: Zacks Rank and Earnings Estimates - Oddity Tech has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a positive earnings outlook, while Adyen N.V. has a Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell), suggesting a less favorable earnings outlook [3] - The Zacks Rank system emphasizes companies with strong earnings estimate revisions, making ODD a more appealing option for investors focused on earnings growth [3] Group 2: Valuation Metrics - ODD has a forward P/E ratio of 13.87, significantly lower than ADYEY's forward P/E of 32.33, indicating that ODD may be undervalued compared to ADYEY [5] - The PEG ratio for ODD is 1.16, while ADYEY's PEG ratio is 1.76, suggesting that ODD offers better value relative to its expected earnings growth [5] - ODD's P/B ratio is 4.91, compared to ADYEY's P/B of 9.06, further supporting the notion that ODD is more attractively priced [6] Group 3: Value Grades - ODD has a Value grade of B, while ADYEY has a Value grade of F, indicating that ODD is viewed more favorably by value investors based on key fundamental metrics [6]

Core Viewpoint - Investors in the Mining - Miscellaneous sector should consider Glencore PLC (GLNCY) and Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. (IVPAF) as potential undervalued stocks, with GLNCY appearing to be the superior option based on various valuation metrics [1][7]. Valuation Metrics - GLNCY has a forward P/E ratio of 20.78, while IVPAF has a significantly higher forward P/E of 35.96 [5]. - The PEG ratio for GLNCY is 1.07, indicating a favorable valuation relative to its expected earnings growth, compared to IVPAF's PEG ratio of 1.12 [5]. - GLNCY's P/B ratio stands at 2.53, which is lower than IVPAF's P/B ratio of 3.5, suggesting that GLNCY is more attractively priced relative to its book value [6]. Earnings Outlook - GLNCY has shown a stronger improvement in its earnings outlook compared to IVPAF, which is a critical factor for value investors [3][7]. - The overall valuation figures and solid earnings outlook position GLNCY as the better value option in the current market [7].

Core Insights - The earnings season for Q4 2025 is highlighted by the performance of Mastercard (MA) and Visa (V), both of which have underperformed relative to the S&P 500 over the last three months [1] - Sales and EPS expectations for Visa are projected at 14% EPS growth and 12% higher sales, while Mastercard is expected to see 16% EPS growth and 10% higher sales [1] Quarterly Expectations - Visa's EPS growth is expected to be 14% with sales increasing by 12% [1] - Mastercard is anticipated to achieve 16% EPS growth alongside a 10% rise in sales [1] Growth Rates - The growth rates for both companies are commendable given their mature status, indicating underlying consumer strength [2] Valuation Picture - MA shares are trading at a 27.2X forward 12-month earnings multiple, while Visa trades at 24.4X, both below their five-year medians and highs [3] - The PEG ratios for both companies are also below five-year medians and not near five-year highs [3] Consumer Strength - The expected growth for both companies is driven by continued consumer strength and a resilient U.S. economy, reflected in higher volumes across key segments [4] Comparative Attractiveness - Revisions for Mastercard are more bullish compared to Visa, although both stocks have shown similar performance over the past five years, each gaining approximately 70% [5] - The favorable revisions trend for Mastercard provides it with a slight edge over Visa [5] Historical Valuation - Both stocks are considered cheap on a historical basis, with MA shares trading at a premium due to stronger forecasted EPS growth [6] - Guidance will be crucial for future decisions, as positive commentary could enhance EPS and sales outlooks for both companies [6]

Group 1: Ciena Corporation (CIEN) - Ciena Corporation is a network technology company with a Zacks Rank 1 [1] - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for its current year earnings has increased by 22.3% over the last 60 days [1] - The company has a PEG ratio of 1.04, significantly lower than the industry average of 5.15 [1] - Ciena possesses a Growth Score of A [1] Group 2: Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL) - Skillsoft Corp. is a digital learning solutions provider with a Zacks Rank 1 [2] - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for its current year earnings has increased by 19.8% over the last 60 days [2] - The company has a PEG ratio of 0.23, compared to the industry average of 0.77 [2] - Skillsoft possesses a Growth Score of B [2] Group 3: Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (FET) - Forum Energy Technologies is an energy equipment and services company with a Zacks Rank 1 [3] - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for its current year earnings has increased by 31% over the last 60 days [3] - The company has a PEG ratio of 0.21, significantly lower than the industry average of 1.15 [3] - Forum Energy Technologies possesses a Growth Score of A [3]

Core Viewpoint - Adient (ADNT) is currently viewed as a better value opportunity compared to Mobileye Global (MBLY) based on various financial metrics and rankings [1]. Valuation Metrics - Adient has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a stronger earnings outlook compared to Mobileye Global, which has a Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell) [3]. - The forward P/E ratio for Adient is 10.16, significantly lower than Mobileye Global's forward P/E of 29.00 [5]. - Adient's PEG ratio stands at 0.65, while Mobileye Global's PEG ratio is 1.01, suggesting that Adient may be undervalued relative to its expected earnings growth [5]. - Adient has a P/B ratio of 0.75, compared to Mobileye Global's P/B of 0.83, indicating a more favorable market value relative to its book value [6]. Investment Grade - Adient has earned a Value grade of A, while Mobileye Global has received a Value grade of D, reflecting a significant difference in perceived value [6]. - The combination of Zacks Rank and Style Scores suggests that value investors are likely to prefer Adient over Mobileye Global at this time [7].

Core Viewpoint - Kinder Morgan's stock performance has shown a decline of 3.87% in the most recent trading day, contrasting with gains in major indices like the S&P 500, Dow, and Nasdaq [1] Group 1: Stock Performance - Kinder Morgan closed at $26.82, with a decrease of 3.87% from the previous session, which is less than the S&P 500's daily gain of 0.62% [1] - Prior to the recent trading day, Kinder Morgan's shares had increased by 2.24%, outperforming the Oils-Energy sector's gain of 0.26% and the S&P 500's gain of 0.59% [1] Group 2: Earnings Projections - Kinder Morgan is expected to report earnings of $0.36 per share, reflecting a year-over-year growth of 12.5% [2] - The consensus estimate for quarterly revenue is projected at $4.42 billion, which is an increase of 10.91% compared to the same period last year [2] Group 3: Annual Estimates - For the annual period, earnings are anticipated to be $1.28 per share, indicating an increase of 11.3% from the previous year, while revenue is expected to remain stable at $16.85 billion [3] Group 4: Analyst Sentiment - Recent changes in analyst estimates for Kinder Morgan are crucial, as positive revisions indicate optimism regarding the company's business and profitability [3] - The Zacks Consensus EPS estimate has risen by 1.88% in the past month, and Kinder Morgan currently holds a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [5] Group 5: Valuation Metrics - Kinder Morgan's Forward P/E ratio stands at 20.62, which is higher than the industry average of 16.1, suggesting that the stock is trading at a premium [6] - The company has a PEG ratio of 2.3, compared to the industry average of 1.51, indicating a higher valuation relative to expected earnings growth [7] Group 6: Industry Ranking - The Oil and Gas - Production and Pipelines industry, which includes Kinder Morgan, has a Zacks Industry Rank of 42, placing it in the top 18% of over 250 industries [7] - The Zacks Industry Rank measures the strength of industry groups based on the average Zacks Rank of individual stocks, with the top 50% rated industries outperforming the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1 [8]

Core Viewpoint - Investors are evaluating which stock presents a better value opportunity between Spire (SR) and Atmos Energy (ATO) in the Utility - Gas Distribution sector [1] Group 1: Valuation Metrics - Both Spire and Atmos Energy currently hold a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating positive earnings estimate revisions for both companies [3] - Spire has a forward P/E ratio of 15.68, while Atmos Energy has a forward P/E of 20.80, suggesting Spire may be undervalued compared to Atmos Energy [5] - The PEG ratio for Spire is 1.49, compared to Atmos Energy's PEG ratio of 2.61, indicating Spire's earnings growth is more favorably priced [5] - Spire's P/B ratio is 1.55, while Atmos Energy's P/B ratio is 1.97, further supporting the notion that Spire is a more attractive value option [6] Group 2: Value Grades - Based on various valuation metrics, Spire holds a Value grade of B, whereas Atmos Energy has a Value grade of D, highlighting Spire as the superior value option [6]