Workflow
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
icon
Search documents
Understanding the Financial Performance of ZipRecruiter, Inc. (NYSE:ZIP) in the Competitive Online Employment Marketplace
Financial Modeling Prep· 2025-09-26 15:00
Company Overview - ZipRecruiter, Inc. is a significant online employment marketplace connecting job seekers with employers, operating in a competitive landscape alongside tech-driven platforms like Squarespace, Flywire, Clear Secure, TaskUs, and FIGS [1] Financial Performance - ZipRecruiter's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is -5.32%, which is below its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 6.16%, indicating insufficient returns to cover capital costs [2][6] - Squarespace, Inc. has a negative ROIC of -0.27% against a WACC of 6.66%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -0.04 [3] - Flywire Corporation shows a ROIC of -0.77% with a WACC of 9.88%, leading to a ratio of -0.08 [3] - Clear Secure, Inc. stands out with a ROIC of 100.50% and a WACC of 9.49%, yielding a ROIC to WACC ratio of 10.59, indicating high capital efficiency [4][6] - TaskUs, Inc. has a ROIC of 8.40% against a WACC of 12.56%, resulting in a ratio of 0.67, while FIGS, Inc. has a ROIC of 0.78% and a WACC of 9.74%, with a ratio of 0.08 [5][6]
Analysis of Motorsport Games Inc. (NASDAQ:MSGM) and Its Competitors' Capital Efficiency
Financial Modeling Prep· 2025-09-26 00:00
Core Viewpoint - Motorsport Games Inc. (NASDAQ:MSGM) is underperforming in terms of capital efficiency, as indicated by its negative Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) compared to its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) [2][6]. Financial Metrics Summary - Motorsport Games Inc. has a ROIC of -28.03% and a WACC of 13.73%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.04, indicating insufficient returns to cover its cost of capital [2][6]. - Genius Group Limited (GNS) has a ROIC of -29.47% and a WACC of 25.16%, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -1.17, which is less negative than MSGM's but still indicates inefficiency [3]. - Versus Systems Inc. (VS) shows a ROIC of -47.17% and a WACC of 16.17%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.92, indicating even lower efficiency than MSGM [4]. - Cosmos Health Inc. (COSM) has a ROIC of -33.52% and a WACC of 17.85%, with a ROIC to WACC ratio of -1.88, slightly better than MSGM but still negative [4]. - Magic Empire Global Limited (MEGL) has the highest ROIC to WACC ratio among peers at -0.48, with a ROIC of -7.64% and a WACC of 15.98%, indicating it is closer to covering its cost of capital [5]. - Mobile Global Esports Inc. (MGAM) presents the most concerning figures with a ROIC of -351.37% and a WACC of 4.64%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -75.66, highlighting severe inefficiencies [5][6].
CF Bankshares Inc. (NASDAQ:CFBK) Capital Efficiency Analysis
Financial Modeling Prep· 2025-09-25 00:00
Core Insights - CF Bankshares Inc. (CFBK) operates in a competitive banking landscape with peers such as Citizens Community Bancorp, Colony Bankcorp, Community West Bancshares, Citizens Holding Company, and C&F Financial Corporation [1] - CFBK's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is -1.19%, significantly below its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 24.98%, indicating inefficiencies in capital utilization [2][5] - The ROIC to WACC ratio for CFBK is -0.048, further emphasizing the company's struggle to generate returns relative to its capital costs [2] - Citizens Community Bancorp (CZWI) has a ROIC of 0.80% and a WACC of 18.82%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of 0.042, indicating low efficiency in capital utilization [3] - Colony Bankcorp (CBAN) shows a negative ROIC of -0.63% and a WACC of 12.69%, with a ROIC to WACC ratio of -0.050, reflecting similar inefficiencies as CFBK [3] - Community West Bancshares (CWBC) has a ROIC of 4.54% and a WACC of 11.57%, achieving a ROIC to WACC ratio of 0.392, indicating better capital efficiency [4] - C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) stands out with a ROIC of 6.28% and a WACC of 13.55%, resulting in the highest ROIC to WACC ratio of 0.463 among peers, demonstrating superior capital efficiency [4][5]
Comparative Analysis of Financial Efficiency Among Tech Companies
Financial Modeling Prep· 2025-09-23 15:00
Company Analysis - Marchex, Inc. has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) of -15.82% and a Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 12.69%, indicating it is not generating returns above its cost of capital, which is a concerning sign for investors [1] - comScore, Inc. shows a ROIC of -22.54% with a WACC of 5.57%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -4.05, highlighting significant inefficiencies in generating returns relative to its cost of capital, indicating potential financial struggles [2] - Liquidity Services, Inc. has a ROIC of 10.21% and a WACC of 8.71%, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of 1.17, indicating it is generating returns above its cost of capital, making it the most efficient among its peers and an attractive option for investors [3]
Understanding Capital Efficiency in Biotech: A Look at ADC Therapeutics S.A. and Peers
Financial Modeling Prep· 2025-09-21 15:00
Capital Efficiency Analysis - ADC Therapeutics S.A. has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) of -54.62% and a Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 20.44%, indicating significant challenges in capital efficiency [1][5] - Ciena Corporation shows a ROIC of 3.79% against a WACC of 8.87%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of 0.43, suggesting it is closer to covering its cost of capital [2][5] - COMSovereign Holding Corp. presents a ROIC of -694.61% and a WACC of 15.44%, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -44.99, indicating severe inefficiencies [2][5] - Altair Engineering Inc. has a ROIC of 0.75% with a WACC of 10.57%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of 0.07, showing challenges similar to ADC Therapeutics [3][5] - ADTRAN Holdings, Inc. has a ROIC of -8.41% and a WACC of 9.27%, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -0.91, indicating it is not generating sufficient returns [3][5] - Sanmina Corporation stands out with a ROIC of 9.69% and a WACC of 9.20%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of 1.05, making it the most efficient in capital utilization among the listed companies [4][5]
Joint Stock Company Kaspi.kz (LSE:KSPI) Financial Performance Analysis
Financial Modeling Prep· 2025-09-21 15:00
Company Overview - Joint Stock Company Kaspi.kz is a leading financial technology company based in Kazakhstan, offering services such as payments, marketplace, and fintech solutions, and is recognized for its innovative integration of these services [1] Financial Performance - Kaspi.kz has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) of 41.90%, significantly higher than its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 4.59%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of 9.14, indicating high efficiency in generating returns from invested capital [2][6] - In comparison, Corpay, Inc. has a ROIC of 10.23% and a WACC of 7.12%, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of 1.44, showing less efficiency than Kaspi.kz [3] - Klaviyo, Inc. has a negative ROIC of -8.82% against a WACC of 10.11%, resulting in a negative ROIC to WACC ratio of -0.87, indicating inefficiency in capital utilization [3] - JSC Halyk Bank has a ROIC of 19.90% and a WACC of 22.38%, with a ROIC to WACC ratio of 0.89, showing returns below its cost of capital [4] - Evolution AB achieves a ROIC of 30.35% and a WACC of 8.35%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of 3.64, which is efficient but still lower than Kaspi.kz's performance [4] - Cellebrite DI Ltd. has a ROIC of 13.30% and a WACC of 17.95%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of 0.74, indicating insufficient returns relative to its cost of capital [5] Competitive Position - Overall, Kaspi.kz stands out among its peers with the highest ROIC to WACC ratio, showcasing its superior ability to utilize capital effectively and generate substantial returns [5][6]
SANUWAVE Health, Inc. (OTC:SNWV) Showcases Strong Financial Health with Impressive ROIC
Financial Modeling Prep· 2025-09-20 15:00
Core Insights - SANUWAVE Health, Inc. is a leader in regenerative medicine, focusing on non-invasive, high-energy acoustic pressure shockwave technology for applications in wound care and orthopedics [1] - The company's financial metrics, particularly ROIC and WACC, indicate strong efficiency and financial health [1] Financial Performance - SANUWAVE's ROIC is 54.33%, significantly higher than its WACC of 16.34%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of 3.32, demonstrating robust returns above its cost of capital [2] - In contrast, Rafarma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Pressure BioSciences, Inc. have lower ROIC to WACC ratios of 0.54 and 0.63, respectively, while GulfSlope Energy, Inc. has a negative ROIC, highlighting SANUWAVE's superior performance [3]
Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:ETON) Financial Efficiency Analysis
Financial Modeling Prep· 2025-09-19 15:00
Company Overview - Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing innovative treatments for rare diseases, aiming to address unmet medical needs [1] Financial Performance - Eton's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is -1.26%, while its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) is 8.78%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -0.14, which is better than its peers [2][5] - Comparatively, Aquestive Therapeutics has a ROIC of -69.51% and a WACC of 14.86%, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -4.68 [3] - Fennec Pharmaceuticals has a ROIC of -27.37% and a WACC of 7.50%, resulting in a ratio of -3.65, making it the least inefficient among its peers [3] - Eyenovia's ROIC is -82.43% against a WACC of 15.56%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -5.30 [4] - Verrica Pharmaceuticals shows a ROIC of -166.93% and a WACC of 17.86%, with a ratio of -9.34 [4] - Evelo Biosciences has the lowest efficiency, with a ROIC of -201.37% and a WACC of 9.04%, leading to a ratio of -22.28 [4] Comparative Analysis - Overall, while Eton Pharmaceuticals is not yet generating returns above its cost of capital, its performance indicates potential for improvement in financial efficiency compared to other companies in the sector [5]
STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:SSKN) Financial Performance Analysis
Financial Modeling Prep· 2025-09-19 15:00
Company Overview - STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. is a medical technology company focused on developing and commercializing products for dermatological conditions, utilizing expertise in laser technology [1] Financial Performance - STRATA's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is -58.59%, while its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) is 7.71%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -7.60, indicating inefficiencies in capital utilization [2] - Comparatively, Sensus Healthcare, Inc. has a ROIC of -4.47% and a WACC of 10.28%, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -0.44, which is the highest among its peers, suggesting better capital efficiency [3] - Other peers like Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. and SenesTech, Inc. have ROIC to WACC ratios of -13.40 and -12.05, respectively, indicating significant challenges in generating returns above their cost of capital [4] - Xcel Brands, Inc. also faces issues with a ROIC to WACC ratio of -8.94, highlighting inefficiencies in capital management [4] - Overall, all companies, including STRATA, are struggling to generate returns above their cost of capital, with Sensus Healthcare standing out for its relatively better performance [5]
Comparative Analysis of Pharmaceutical Companies' Capital Utilization
Financial Modeling Prep· 2025-09-18 15:00
Financial Performance Comparison - Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) of -1634.05% and a Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 16.41%, indicating extremely poor capital utilization [1][5] - MacroGenics, Inc. has a ROIC of -37.98% and a WACC of 9.15%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -4.15, which is less inefficient compared to Karyopharm [2][5] - TG Therapeutics, Inc. shows a positive ROIC of 15.75% against a WACC of 12.34%, yielding a ROIC to WACC ratio of 1.28, indicating effective capital management [2][5] Industry Context - Heron Therapeutics, Inc. has a ROIC of 0.82% and a WACC of 6.57%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of 0.12, which is still better than Karyopharm's performance [3] - Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. has a ROIC of -10.08% and a WACC of 5.90%, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -1.71, indicating inefficiencies but still better than Karyopharm [3] - Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reports a ROIC of -30.47% and a WACC of 7.57%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -4.02, showing inefficiencies but not as severe as Karyopharm's [4]