Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Charming Medical Ltd. and certain officers for alleged violations of federal securities laws during the Class Period from October 10, 2025, to November 12, 2026 [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for investors who purchased Charming securities during the specified Class Period [2]. - Allegations include failure to disclose a fraudulent stock promotion scheme, insider trading activities, and misleading public statements regarding the company's business and operations [3]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors wishing to join the lawsuit must request to be appointed as lead plaintiff by February 17, 2026, although participation in any recovery does not require this role [4]. - A copy of the Complaint can be reviewed on the law firm's website [4]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning they will only collect fees if the lawsuit is successful [5]. - The firm has a strong track record, having recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors in similar cases [6].

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania--(Newsfile Corp. - January 8, 2026) - National plaintiffs' law firm Berger Montague PC announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Telix Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (NASDAQ: TLX) ("Telix" or the "Company") on behalf of investors who purchased Telix securities during the period of February 21, 2025 through August 28, 2025 (the "Class Period").Investor Deadline: Investors who purchased Telix securities during the Class Period may, no later than January 9, 2026, seek to be ...

Core Viewpoint - The Varonis Systems, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company misrepresented its revenue outlook and growth potential, leading to significant stock price declines following disappointing financial results [1][3][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Molchanov v. Varonis Systems, Inc., and it involves purchasers of Varonis common stock between February 4, 2025, and October 28, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until March 9, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. - The lawsuit alleges that Varonis and its executives created a false impression of the company's financial health, particularly regarding its annual recurring revenue growth and the effectiveness of its sales strategies [3]. Group 2: Financial Performance - On October 28, 2025, Varonis reported third-quarter results that significantly missed prior projections, leading to a lowered full-year guidance [4]. - The CEO, Yakov Faitelson, attributed the shortfall to lower renewals in both the Federal vertical and the non-Federal on-prem subscription business during the final weeks of the quarter [4]. - Following the announcement of these results, Varonis's stock price fell nearly 49% [4]. Group 3: Legal Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Varonis common stock during the class period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff [5]. - The lead plaintiff is typically the investor with the greatest financial interest in the case and acts on behalf of all class members [5]. - Investors can choose their own legal representation for the class action lawsuit, and participation as lead plaintiff does not affect the ability to share in any potential recovery [5]. Group 4: Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6]. - The firm has been ranked 1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years [6]. - Robbins Geller is recognized for obtaining some of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including a record $7.2 billion in the Enron case [6].

Core Viewpoint - Pomerantz LLP is investigating potential securities fraud and unlawful business practices involving Bgin Blockchain Limited and its officers or directors [1] Financial Performance - Bgin reported a significant decline in total revenue of approximately $96 million for the six months ending June 30, 2025, compared to the previous year [2] - Operating expenses surged by 582.8%, indicating severe financial strain [2] - The company's gross profit fell from $84.8 million in the prior year to a gross loss of $6.3 million [2] Management Changes - On December 5, 2025, Bgin announced the termination of its Chief Communications Officer's employment on a mutual basis [2] - On December 15, 2025, Bgin decided not to renew its engagement with its current auditor and approved the hiring of a new independent registered public accounting firm effective December 12, 2025 [2] Stock Performance - As of December 29, 2025, Bgin's stock closed at $2.45, which is below its initial public offering (IPO) price [2]

Core Viewpoint - Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims of potential securities fraud and unlawful business practices involving Ramaco Resources, Inc. and its officers and directors [1][2]. Group 1: Investigation Details - The investigation is prompted by allegations from Wolfpack Research that Ramaco's Brook Mine project is a "hoax" and that the company manipulated data to misrepresent its profitability [2]. - Following the allegations, Ramaco's stock price experienced a significant decline, falling by $3.81 per share, or 9.57%, closing at $36.01 per share on October 23, 2025 [2]. Group 2: Pomerantz LLP Background - Pomerantz LLP is recognized as a leading firm in corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation, with a history of over 85 years in fighting for victims of securities fraud and corporate misconduct [2]. - The firm has successfully recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards for class members [2].

Core Viewpoint - A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed against SLM Corporation (Sallie Mae) for alleged misrepresentations regarding its loan modification programs and private education loan delinquency rates [3][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was initiated in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on behalf of investors who purchased SLM securities between July 25, 2025, and August 14, 2025 [3]. - Allegations include violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by the Company and certain senior officers [3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Investors wishing to serve as lead plaintiffs must file necessary documents by February 17, 2026, with the option to remain as absent class members without taking action [5]. - All legal representation is on a contingency fee basis, meaning shareholders incur no fees or expenses [5]. Group 3: Law Firm Background - Bernstein Liebhard LLP has recovered over $3.5 billion for clients since 1993 and has represented both individual investors and large pension funds [6]. - The firm has been recognized multiple times for its success in litigating class actions, being named to The National Law Journal's "Plaintiffs' Hot List" and listed in The Legal 500 for several consecutive years [6].

Core Viewpoint - A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been initiated against Bitdeer Technologies Group, alleging misrepresentations regarding the company's SEALMINER A4 project, affecting investors who purchased securities between June 6, 2024, and November 10, 2025 [3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of investors who acquired Bitdeer securities during the specified period [3]. - The allegations include violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against Bitdeer and certain senior officers [3]. Group 2: Class Action Participation - Investors wishing to serve as lead plaintiffs must file necessary documents by February 2, 2026, with the role involving representation of other class members in the litigation [4]. - Participation as a lead plaintiff is not required to share in any potential recovery, and shareholders incur no fees or expenses as representation is on a contingency fee basis [4]. Group 3: Law Firm Background - Bernstein Liebhard LLP has a history of recovering over $3.5 billion for clients since 1993 and has represented both individual investors and large pension funds [5]. - The firm has been recognized multiple times for its success in litigating class actions, being named to The National Law Journal's "Plaintiffs' Hot List" thirteen times and listed in The Legal 500 for sixteen consecutive years [5].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Stride, Inc. and its senior executives for securities fraud following significant stock drops attributed to potential violations of federal securities laws [1][3]. Company Overview - Stride, Inc. is an education technology company that provides an online platform to students across the U.S. [4]. Allegations and Stock Impact - The lawsuit claims that Stride inflated enrollment numbers by retaining "ghost students," ignored compliance requirements, and had a poor customer experience leading to higher withdrawal rates and lower conversion rates [4]. - On September 14, 2025, a report of fraud allegations caused Stride's stock to drop by $18.60 per share, over 11%, from $158.36 to $139.76 [5]. - On October 28, 2025, Stride admitted to poor customer experience, resulting in an estimated 10,000-15,000 fewer enrollments, leading to a stock price drop of $83.48 per share, over 54%, from $153.53 to $70.05 [6]. Legal Proceedings - Investors have until January 12, 2026, to request to lead the case in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, under the caption MacMahon v. Stride, Inc., et al. [3].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fermi Inc. and its executives due to significant stock price drops linked to potential violations of federal securities laws [1][3]. Group 1: Company Overview - Fermi Inc. is an energy and AI infrastructure company focused on building large-scale nuclear reactors to support grid-independent data centers for AI companies [4]. - The company's flagship project, Project Matador, aims to provide dedicated power for AI workloads [4]. Group 2: IPO and Allegations - Fermi completed its IPO in October 2025, claiming strong demand for Project Matador and securing a 20-year lease with an investment-grade-rated tenant [5]. - Allegations suggest that Fermi overstated tenant demand and misrepresented the agreement with the First Tenant [6]. Group 3: Stock Price Impact - Following the announcement that the First Tenant terminated the Advance in Aid of Construction Agreement, Fermi's stock dropped by $5.16 per share, over 33%, from $15.25 to $10.09 on December 12, 2025 [7].

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. for allegedly making false and misleading statements regarding its financial health and growth prospects during a specified class period [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations Against Sprouts - The lawsuit claims that Sprouts' reports of growth and stability were overly optimistic and did not reflect the reality of macroeconomic conditions [2]. - It is alleged that Sprouts' consumer base was not as resilient as claimed, leading to reduced spending [2]. - The company reportedly overstated its ability to meet growth projections, which were not supported by actual performance [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses can seek to be appointed as lead plaintiffs by January 26, 2026, or remain absent class members [3]. - The lead plaintiff will represent the interests of all class members and select legal counsel for the case [3]. Group 3: Law Firm Background - Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP is a prominent law firm specializing in securities-fraud class actions and has a history of significant recoveries in securities litigation [4]. - The firm has received multiple accolades for its work in the field, indicating a strong reputation within the legal community [4].