Group 1 - The relationship between China and Japan, which had shown signs of improvement in the economic sector, is now shifting towards confrontation due to remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo regarding Taiwan [2][5] - China's response to Kishi's comments has included a call for citizens to postpone travel to Japan, indicating that the situation is beginning to impact the real economy [2][4] - The diplomatic communication channels between the two countries have become strained, with Japan expressing concern over China's travel advisory and urging appropriate responses from the Chinese side [4] Group 2 - Kishi's remarks in the Japanese Diet on November 7 discussed a hypothetical scenario involving military action in Taiwan, suggesting that Japan might engage militarily to support the U.S. if a crisis arises [5][6] - The Chinese government and state media have reacted strongly to Kishi's statements, warning that any misjudgment by Japan could lead to aggressive actions, which would be met with a strong response from China [6]

"日本前首相安倍晋三曾宣称'台湾有事就是日本有事'，但这是安倍在卸任首相后在线上演讲中发表 的，并非在国会这样的官方场合。"泉川说。 在泉川看来，高市要煽动"台湾有事"，这极不恰当且极为危险。 泉川指出："日本在甲午战争后，通过《马关条约》将台湾变为其殖民地。台湾有着长达50年被日本统 治和奴役的沉重历史。所以，对中国人民来说，日本政府在台湾问题上的表态比其他国家的表态具有更 重的意味。" 1972年中日两国政府签订《中日联合声明》，日方在声明中作出过明确承诺，即"日本国政府承认中华 人民共和国政府是中国的唯一合法政府。中华人民共和国政府重申：台湾是中华人民共和国领土不可分 割的一部分。日本国政府充分理解和尊重中国政府的这一立场，并坚持遵循波茨坦公告第八条的立 场。" 新华社东京11月16日电 专访｜高市涉台荒唐言论"影响恶劣"——访日本冲绳大学地域研究所特别研究 员泉川友树 新华社记者陈泽安 杨智翔 日本冲绳大学地域研究所特别研究员泉川友树15日接受新华社记者采访时表示，日本首相高市早苗近日 发表的涉台言论影响非常恶劣，对日本及日本民众的安全保障毫无益处，也会给日中关系造成重大负面 影响。 高市7日在国会答 ...

原标题：误导安全政策方向 加剧日中关系紧张 日本前首相鸠山由纪夫发文强调，曾有人鼓吹"台湾有事就是日本有事"，如今高市首相又提出，台 湾有事可能成为日本行使集体自卫权的存亡危机事态。其意在制造紧张氛围，为军备扩张铺路。台湾是 中国领土不可分割的一部分，"台湾问题纯属中国内政，日本无权插手。" 日本公明党党首齐藤铁夫表示，高市的言论非常令人震惊，为了让国民安心，必须作出修正。 日本社民党党首福岛瑞穗指出，高市将"台湾有事"视为"存亡危机事态"的判断在逻辑上难以成立。 台湾并非国家，是中国的一部分，不应被纳入允许日本动用武力的情境。此种说法在法律层面明显存在 问题。她警告说，轻率扩大武力行使范围极为危险，可能对日本未来安全政策造成深远影响。日本社会 无论如何都必须阻止战争、阻止危险政策。 日本共产党籍众议员志位和夫在社交媒体上发文说，高市的涉台言论正演变为严重的国际问题。要 想使日中关系朝着积极方向发展，需要以两国确认的共识为基础，发挥智慧，冷静对话，而不是发表加 剧紧张局势的挑衅性言论。他再次要求高市撤回有关言论。 据日本《赤旗报》报道，日本共产党籍参议员山添拓在记者会上说，高市的言论加剧日中紧张关系 并导致互 ...

Core Viewpoint - The remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo regarding Taiwan represent a dangerous historical and strategic perspective, necessitating vigilance from the international community, especially Asian nations [1][2][3]. Group 1: Japan's Military and Strategic Posture - Kishi Nobuo's assertion that "Taiwan's issues equate to Japan's issues" reflects a troubling trend in Japanese politics, linking China's national unification with Japan's security [2]. - The historical context of Japanese militarism is invoked, highlighting past aggressions justified under the guise of "survival crises," which raises concerns about a potential resurgence of militaristic policies [2][3]. - Japan's recent shifts in security policy, including increased defense budgets and the pursuit of offensive capabilities, indicate a significant and concerning strategic pivot [3]. Group 2: Historical Context and Implications - Japan's historical actions in Taiwan, including colonization and wartime aggression, are emphasized, underscoring the moral implications of current political rhetoric [3]. - The article stresses that Taiwan is a core interest for China, and any external interference in its resolution is unacceptable, reinforcing China's sovereignty [3]. - The 80th anniversary of the victory in the Anti-Japanese War is highlighted, contrasting Japan's historical aggressions with China's current resolve to maintain territorial integrity [3].

14日，中国外交部和中国驻日本使领馆郑重提醒中国公民近期避免前往日本。15日，中国国际航空、南方航空、东方航空、海南航空等多家航司发布通知， 对于出行日期在12月31日之前、涉及日本相关航线且符合相关条件的客票，可予以免费退改处理。 日本《每日新闻》16日称，由于来自中国的访日游客数量众多，此举可能会对日本旅游业造成重大影响。日本时事通讯社16日称，中方可能会继续采取相应 措施，若冲突持续，日中关系降温将不可避免。 【环球时报综合报道】日本首相高市早苗的涉台错误言行，持续引发包括中国在内的多方批评和声讨。14日，中国驻日本大使吴江浩奉示约见日本外务事务 次官船越健裕，强调如果日本胆敢武力介入台海局势，将构成侵略行为，中方必将迎头痛击！16日，中国教育部发布赴日留学预警，中国文化和旅游部郑重 提醒中国游客近期避免前往日本旅游。日本前首相、立宪民主党党首野田佳彦16日批评高市早苗的言论"过于越界，导致中日关系陷入非常严峻的局面"。高 市的言论也在韩国引发警惕。多家韩媒指出，高市被称为"女版安倍"，既承袭日本前首相安倍晋三时期的安全政策路线，也象征日本政治正在加速右倾化。 16日接受《环球时报》记者采访的日本学者表 ...

Core Viewpoint - The statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo regarding Taiwan represent a dangerous historical and strategic perspective, necessitating vigilance from the international community, especially Asian nations [1][2][3] Group 1: Political Implications - Kishi Nobuo's assertion that "Taiwan's issues equate to Japan's issues" reflects a troubling trend in Japanese politics, linking China's national unity with Japan's security [2] - The rhetoric surrounding "survival crisis" has historical precedents in Japan's militaristic past, raising concerns about a potential resurgence of militarism [2][3] Group 2: Historical Context - Japan has a significant historical responsibility regarding Taiwan, having occupied it for half a century and committing numerous atrocities [3] - The return of Taiwan to China post-World War II is supported by international legal documents, yet Japan's current stance undermines this historical resolution [3] Group 3: Military and Security Concerns - Japan's recent shifts in security policy, including increased defense budgets and the potential development of offensive weapons, indicate a move towards militarization [3] - The current administration's ambiguous stance on nuclear policies raises alarms about Japan's intentions, suggesting a departure from its post-war pacifism [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the provocative remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida regarding Taiwan, emphasizing the need for Japanese leaders to maintain rationality and the legitimacy of China's firm response to such provocations [1]. Group 1: Geopolitical Context - Ruben Guzzetti, director of the Argentine Geopolitical Research Institute, asserts that the UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 clearly states there is only one China, and Taiwan is part of it, which is a fundamental principle of international relations [1]. - Guzzetti highlights that the resolution is an authoritative document for addressing the Taiwan issue and is part of the current international order [1]. Group 2: Japan's Position - Kishida's recent comments in the Diet regarding Taiwan suggest that if military action is involved, it could constitute a "survival crisis situation" for Japan [1]. - According to Japanese law, even without a direct attack, Japan can exercise collective self-defense if a situation is deemed a threat to its survival [1]. - Kishida reiterated in the Diet that his statements align with the consistent views of the Japanese government and he has no intention of retracting them [1].

古泽蒂表示，联合国大会第2758号决议明确世界上只有一个中国，台湾是中国的一部分，这是国际 关系的基本准则之一。他说，"这项决议是处理台湾问题的权威文件，它属于现行国际秩序的一部分"。 对于高市日前悍然发表涉台挑衅言论，古泽蒂说，一直以来，有些国家通过各种方式试图阻碍中国 和平发展，台湾问题被当作其中的一个借口。他说，日本领导人应保持理性，台湾问题如何解决完全取 决于中国人民自己，不容任何外部势力干涉。 高市7日在国会答辩时就"台湾有事"表示，如果伴随出动军舰和使用武力，可能会构成"存亡危机事 态"。根据日本法律，如发生被认定为威胁日本的"存亡危机事态"，即便并未直接遭受攻击，日本也将 可以行使集体自卫权。10日，高市在国会答辩时坚称，其言论遵循日本政府的一贯见解，无意撤回。 新华社布宜诺斯艾利斯11月15日电 （记者 张铎 王钟毅）针对日本首相高市早苗的涉台挑衅言论， 阿根廷地缘政治研究所所长鲁文·古泽蒂15日在接受新华社记者采访时说，日本领导人应保持理性，中 国政府对此予以坚定回应完全正当。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning emphasized Japan's obligation to adhere to the commitments made in the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement regarding Taiwan, asserting that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China and that Japan recognizes the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate government of China [1][4][5]. Group 1 - Mao Ning reiterated that the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement explicitly states Japan's recognition of the People's Republic of China as the only legitimate government of China [1][4]. - The statement also highlights Japan's understanding and respect for China's position on Taiwan being an inseparable part of its territory [1][4]. - Mao Ning's posts included bilingual posters in English and Japanese to reinforce this message [1][5]. Group 2 - Recent comments by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi suggested that a "Taiwan emergency" could trigger Japan's collective self-defense rights, indicating a potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait [1][9]. - This statement has drawn significant criticism and concern from both China and the international community, as it deviates from Japan's historically cautious stance on Taiwan [1][9]. - The Chinese Foreign Ministry has responded strongly, warning that any military intervention by Japan would be considered an act of aggression, and China would respond decisively [1][9].

Core Points - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning emphasized that Japan must adhere to its commitments regarding the recognition of the People's Republic of China as the sole legal government of China, as stated in the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement [6][12] - Mao Ning's statements were made in response to recent remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, who suggested that a "Taiwan emergency" could justify Japan's collective self-defense, indicating a potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait [12] - The Chinese government has expressed strong opposition to Takaichi's comments, labeling them as a serious provocation to Sino-Japanese relations and a violation of international justice [12] Summary by Sections Diplomatic Statements - Mao Ning reiterated the importance of the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement, which clearly states that the Japanese government recognizes the People's Republic of China as the sole legal government of China and respects China's stance on Taiwan being an inalienable part of its territory [6][8][9] Reactions to Japanese Government - Takaichi's comments have broken the cautious approach historically taken by Japanese governments regarding Taiwan, leading to significant backlash within Japan and among international observers [12] - Former Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba noted that previous Japanese administrations avoided making explicit statements about potential military actions concerning Taiwan, highlighting a shift in Japan's long-standing policy towards China [12] Public and International Response - The Chinese Foreign Ministry has actively disseminated bilingual posters on social media platforms, garnering millions of views and significant international attention [12]