Core Viewpoint - The unification of Taiwan with the mainland is an inevitable historical trend and a common aspiration of the Chinese people, essential for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation [1][5][8]. Group 1: Historical Context - Throughout Chinese history, unification has been the mainstream development, with a shared understanding that "unity leads to strength, while division leads to chaos" [2]. - Taiwan has been part of a unified multi-ethnic state for most of its history, and the Taiwanese people's resistance against foreign occupation reflects a strong patriotic tradition [2][4]. Group 2: Current Relations - Under the leadership of the Communist Party, cross-strait relations have developed significantly, with increasing cooperation and exchanges benefiting both sides [3][5]. - The desire for peace, development, and cooperation is the mainstream sentiment among the Taiwanese people, supported by policies from the mainland [3]. Group 3: Challenges and Opposition - The "Taiwan independence" movement is viewed as a minor force that undermines the collective interests of the Chinese nation and poses risks to Taiwan's future [4][5]. - External interference is seen as an obstacle to unification, but it is asserted that such efforts will ultimately fail [5][8]. Group 4: Future Prospects - The development of the mainland's economy and military strength is expected to facilitate the unification process, as it enhances the ability to promote social exchanges and deepen emotional connections between the two sides [8][9]. - A reasonable "two systems" proposal for Taiwan is suggested, which would respect its current social system while allowing greater participation in governance and international affairs [9].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that the unification of Taiwan and mainland China is an inevitable historical trend supported by the collective will of the Chinese people and the historical context of the Chinese nation [2][5][6]. Group 1: Historical Context and National Sentiment - The pursuit of unification has been a mainstream historical development for thousands of years, with a shared understanding that "unity leads to strength, while division leads to chaos" [2]. - Taiwan has historically been part of a unified multi-ethnic nation, and the Taiwanese people's patriotic traditions are highlighted through their resistance against foreign occupation [2][3]. - The article asserts that all 23 million Taiwanese are part of the Chinese nation, and the desire for unification is a common aspiration among all Chinese people [4][5]. Group 2: Development of Cross-Strait Relations - Under the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party, cross-strait relations have seen significant development, with increasing cooperation and exchanges benefiting both sides [3][5]. - The article argues that the policies from the mainland have resonated with the Taiwanese people's desire for peace, development, and cooperation, shaping the mainstream public opinion in Taiwan [3][5]. Group 3: Challenges and External Interference - The article describes "Taiwan independence" forces as detrimental to the future of Taiwan, manipulating public sentiment and aligning with foreign powers against the interests of the Chinese nation [4][6]. - It emphasizes that external interference cannot alter the historical trend towards unification, and the article calls for a collective resolution to the Taiwan issue by the Chinese people [5][6]. Group 4: Future Prospects and National Unity - The article posits that the unification of Taiwan is not only a matter of national sentiment but also a necessity for national sovereignty and territorial integrity [6][7]. - It highlights the significant advancements in mainland China's economic, military, and cultural strength, which are seen as key factors driving the unification process [7][8]. - The article concludes that unification is both a historical inevitability and a moral imperative, with the potential for a mutually beneficial arrangement for Taiwan's governance and autonomy [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article commemorates the 80th anniversary of Taiwan's recovery, emphasizing its significance as a result of the Chinese people's efforts during the Anti-Japanese War and the importance of remembering this history for both sides of the Taiwan Strait [4][10]. Historical Context - The event took place at the Zhongshan Hall in Taipei, which was the site of the surrender ceremony marking the end of Japanese colonial rule in Taiwan on October 25, 1945 [5]. - The ceremony was a significant moment, symbolizing the return of Taiwan to Chinese sovereignty after 50 years of Japanese occupation [5][6]. Cultural Significance - The article highlights the cultural resilience of the Taiwanese people during Japanese rule, noting that despite attempts to erase Chinese identity, many Taiwanese maintained their cultural practices and beliefs [8][9]. - Streets in Taipei were renamed to reflect Chinese geography after the recovery, showcasing a return to cultural roots [9]. Contemporary Relevance - Recent events have seen various forms of commemoration for the anniversary, but there is criticism of the current Taiwanese administration for downplaying the historical significance of Taiwan's recovery and misrepresenting the history of Japanese colonialism [10][11]. - The article calls for unity among Taiwanese people to remember their shared history and resist any attempts to separate Taiwan from China [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the announcement by the Xiamen Public Security Bureau in Fujian Province, which is offering rewards for information on 18 core members of Taiwan's military "Psychological Operations Brigade" involved in illegal activities [1] Summary by Relevant Sections - **Background on the Psychological Operations Brigade** The "Psychological Operations Brigade" is divided into six teams responsible for various tasks including information warfare, intelligence research, tactical psychological operations, broadcasting, troop morale, and mobilization. They engage in activities such as setting up anti-propaganda websites, creating subversive games, fabricating audio-visual content, operating anti-propaganda radio stations, and coordinating external forces to mislead public opinion [1] - **Objectives and Activities** The brigade's true aim is to promote the "Taiwan independence" narrative and incite division within the country. Their methods include disseminating misleading information and manipulating public sentiment among both sides of the Taiwan Strait [1] - **Call to Action** The public security authorities urge Taiwanese compatriots to recognize the extreme dangers and harms of "Taiwan independence" and to take action by distancing themselves from separatist forces. They encourage the provision of relevant illegal activity leads and collaboration with mainland compatriots to oppose "Taiwan independence" actions [1]

Group 1 - The Chinese military's development of the Fujian aircraft carrier is progressing smoothly, with successful trials of carrier-based aircraft, indicating its imminent commissioning [2] - The Chinese nuclear policy remains stable and predictable, emphasizing a defensive strategy and a commitment to not using nuclear weapons first [2] - There is a growing sense of national identity among Taiwanese youth, as evidenced by increased support for mainland China and the viewing of military parades [3] Group 2 - The establishment of a research center in Taiwan dedicated to Shinzo Abe has been criticized, highlighting historical grievances related to Japan's colonial rule over Taiwan [4]

Core Viewpoint - The statements made by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Secretary-General, Xu Guoyong, regarding Taiwan's historical status have sparked significant controversy, with strong condemnation from the Kuomintang (KMT) and a rebuttal from the Taiwan Affairs Office, asserting that Taiwan's status as part of China was established post-World War II and is supported by international legal documents [1][2]. Group 1 - Xu Guoyong's claim of "no Taiwan Restoration Day" is criticized as a distortion of history, with the KMT labeling it as "extremely absurd" [1]. - The Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson, Chen Binhua, argues that Taiwan's return to China is a key outcome of World War II and part of the post-war international order, asserting that the issue of Taiwan's status was resolved in 1945 [1]. - International legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration, Potsdam Proclamation, and Japan's surrender terms are cited as confirming China's sovereignty over Taiwan, emphasizing that historical facts cannot be altered [1]. Group 2 - Chen Binhua emphasizes that those who betray history and the nation will face justice and that the unification of China is an inevitable historical trend [2]. - There is a call for Taiwanese compatriots to stand on the right side of history, oppose "Taiwan independence," and work towards national unification and rejuvenation alongside mainland compatriots [2].

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, Chen Binhua, emphasized that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China, historically and legally established, and criticized the U.S. for its stance on Taiwan's political status [1][2][3] Group 1: Historical Context - The Cairo Declaration (1943), the Potsdam Declaration (1945), and the Japanese surrender terms (1945) clearly affirm China's sovereignty over Taiwan [2] - Taiwan was restored to China in October 1945, marking the end of Japanese rule and the re-establishment of Chinese governance over Taiwan and the Penghu Islands [2] - The issue of Taiwan's status was resolved with the victory of the Chinese people in the War of Resistance against Japan [2] Group 2: Current Political Dynamics - The U.S. has been accused of distorting historical facts regarding Taiwan's status and promoting the "Taiwan status undecided" narrative, which undermines China's sovereignty [3] - The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in Taiwan is criticized for manipulating media narratives and collaborating with U.S. institutions to create a false sense of international support for Taiwan's independence [3] - Chen Binhua asserted that the historical status of Taiwan as part of China is unchangeable, and efforts by the DPP and external forces to promote independence will ultimately fail [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council expressed support for Taiwanese artists developing their careers in mainland China, emphasizing their rights to express pride in their identity and oppose separatism, while criticizing the Democratic Progressive Party's attempts to silence them [1] Group 1 - The Taiwan Affairs Office highlighted that Taiwanese performers in mainland China are reflecting their pride as Chinese citizens and their recognition of national identity [1] - The office criticized the Democratic Progressive Party for trying to suppress the voices of these artists, labeling their actions as hypocritical regarding the values of "freedom and democracy" [1] - The statement questioned why so many Taiwanese artists choose to develop their careers in mainland China, suggesting that this trend reflects a broader sentiment among the population [1] Group 2 - The Taiwan Affairs Office reaffirmed its commitment to welcoming and supporting Taiwanese artists in mainland China, ensuring the protection of their legitimate rights and interests [1]

Core Viewpoint - The historical narrative regarding Taiwan's return to China is emphasized, asserting that it cannot be forgotten or altered, and the results of a recent survey reflect a strong understanding of this history among respondents [1][2]. Group 1: Survey Results - A recent CGTN survey conducted among approximately 12,000 respondents across 40 countries revealed that 66.7% of participants are aware of Taiwan's historical return, with awareness among Asian respondents reaching 73.5% [1]. - The majority of respondents view Taiwan's return to China as a result of World War II victories, rejecting any notions of "Taiwan independence" as a denial of these historical achievements [1]. Group 2: Official Commentary - The spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office, Chen Binhua, highlighted that the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japan was crucial in safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity, and it erased the historical shame of repeated failures against foreign invasions [2]. - Chen criticized the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) persistent "Taiwan independence" stance, claiming it challenges the current status of the Taiwan Strait and undermines China's sovereignty over Taiwan, which is considered an integral part of the post-war international order [2].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of commemorating the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the World Anti-Fascist War, highlighting the historical significance and the sacrifices made by the Chinese people, including those from Taiwan, in achieving national liberation and peace [2][3]. Group 1 - The spokesperson from the State Council criticized Lai Ching-te's remarks on the anniversary, accusing him of distorting history and promoting division, which undermines the sacrifices made by the Chinese people during the war [2]. - The article reiterates that Taiwan is an integral part of China and that all Chinese people, including those from Taiwan, fought against Japanese fascism for national survival and revival [3]. - It calls for unity among all Chinese people to oppose "Taiwan independence" and to work towards national reunification and rejuvenation [3].