"我认为他们很软弱。"特朗普表示，"我认为他们不知道该怎么办。""欧洲不知道该怎么办。" 【环球网报道 记者 张倩】据美国"政治新闻网"当地时间9日报道，美国总统特朗普8日在接受该媒体采访时，抨击欧盟是一个由"软弱"之 人主导的"正在衰败"的国家集团，他指责美国的这些传统盟友国家未能控制移民、结束俄乌冲突，并表示自己将支持与其自身愿景相一致 的欧洲政界人士。 "政治新闻网"称，特朗普此次针对欧洲政治领导层的猛烈抨击，是他迄今为止对这些西方国家发出的最严厉批评，而这一言论可能导致美 国与法国、德国等本已极度紧张的关系陷入"彻底决裂"。 报道称，特朗普发表此番言论之际，关于结束俄乌冲突的谈判正处于一个非常微妙的节点。欧洲领导人日益担忧美国可能放弃乌克兰及其 欧洲盟友。在采访中，特朗普并未就此问题向欧洲作出任何安抚性的表态，并称俄罗斯显然比乌克兰处于更有利的地位。 "政治新闻网"称，特朗普还表示将继续在欧洲选举中支持自己喜欢的候选人。特朗普说，"我支持一些人，但很多欧洲人不喜欢我支持的 对象，比如欧尔班。"特朗普称这位匈牙利总理的边境管控政策值得赞赏。 近日，美国发布新版国家安全战略报告，引发欧美媒体关注。这些媒体 ...

这一决定也是欧盟《数字服务法》实施以来的首例重大执法行动，但这让美国政府中的一些官员感到荒谬。 Landau表示，当一些国家以北约成员国的身份出现时，其坚称跨大西洋合作是西方共同安全的基石；但当这些国家以欧盟成员国的身份出 现时，其却推行各种各样的议程，且这些议程往往与美国的利益和安全完全背道而驰，这种自相矛盾的局面不能再继续下去了。 鲁比奥和美国联邦通信委员会主席Brendan Carr表示，罚款表明了欧盟对美国科技公司存在偏见，这是外国政府对美国人民的攻击，也是 其对美国人在网上的审查行为。 欧盟上周宣布对美国社交媒体平台X处以1.4亿美元罚款， 此举引发了美国方面的巨大不满，X公司所有者马斯克以及美国政府官员均对此表示了反 对。 马斯克在上周六的一条推文中抨击称，欧盟应该被废除，将主权归还给欧盟各个国家，这样欧洲各国政府才能更好地代表人民。 马斯克还称，美国不仅应该对欧盟进行回应，还应该对决定罚款的欧洲政客做出惩罚。他很爱欧洲，但他不爱欧盟这个官僚怪物。 美国国务卿鲁比奥与副国务卿Christopher Landau也对欧盟提出了批评。Landau指出，尽管存在北大西洋公约组织，欧盟与特朗普政府在 诸多 ...

新华社北京12月7日电 欧盟委员会5日认定美国社交媒体平台X违反《数字服务法》透明度义务条 款，对其处以1.2亿欧元罚款，美国副总统万斯、国务卿鲁比奥等多名美方高官群起而攻之，指责欧盟 破坏"跨大西洋关系"。 白宫4日发布的美国国家安全战略报告也对欧洲盟友提出尖锐批评。欧盟"外长"卡拉斯6日回应时强 调美国是欧盟"最大盟友"。但西方媒体认为，随着本届美国政府对欧政策出现"急剧转变"迹象，美欧分 歧愈发暴露。 欧盟重罚，美国"急眼" 欧盟委员会5日发布公报，援引欧盟《数字服务法》对美国企业家马斯克旗下社交媒体平台X处以 1.2亿欧元罚款。据多家外媒报道，这是欧盟依据该法规实施的首次重大执法行动。 公报罗列出X平台违反该法规的多项行为：其用户账号的"蓝标认证"仅通过付费即可获得，在界面 设计上对用户具有误导性；其广告资料库在透明度和可访问性方面均不合规；未按规定向符合条件的研 究人员开放平台公共数据访问权限。 据法新社报道，马斯克2022年买下X平台（原称推特）后，对其用户账号的"蓝标认证"系统进行调 整，该认证原本需经过平台核验身份才可获得，调整后则付费即可获得。欧盟认定，这种"欺骗性"设计 致使许多平台用户遭 ...

新华社柏林12月5日电（记者张毅荣 李超）德国《明镜》周刊4日发表文章说，德国、法国、乌克兰和 其他几位欧洲领导人日前在一场电话会谈中警告说，美国"可能会背叛"乌克兰和欧洲。 ...

但在持续的俄乌冲突中，一个颇具讽刺意味的转折是，对于俄罗斯拒绝回到谈判桌的共同失望和猜疑， 反而让美国和欧盟走得更近了。 今年以来，美欧关系一直颇为棘手，双方在如何支持乌克兰、贸易紧张局势和关税等问题上分歧不断， 两大经济体之间的外交关系一度十分紧张。 AI播客：换个方式听新闻 下载mp3 音频由扣子空间生成 本周，双方展现了统一战线，华盛顿和布鲁塞尔相继宣布了针对俄罗斯石油和天然气行业的互补性制裁 方案。 今年年初特朗普重返白宫时，美欧关系曾一度急转直下。这位美国领导人立即将矛头对准欧盟，指责其 存在不公平贸易行为，理由是欧盟在商品交换方面长期保持贸易顺差。 美国驻欧盟大使Andrew Puzder周四表示，在向俄罗斯施压以结束俄乌冲突的问题上，美国和欧盟的立 场是一致的。特朗普总统一向坚决主张结束这场冲突……但当你看到谈判进展不顺时，就需要加大压 力。" 他指出，美国和欧盟几乎同时推出制裁方案，"这表明我们需要加大力度。我们愿意这样做，希望普京 能领会到这个信息，明白这场冲突需要结束。他似乎还没有领会到，但希望这次能让他明白。" Puzder说，近几个月来，美欧关系在一些地缘政治和经济领域总体上有所改善， ...

当中国人民享受假期的欢愉时，特朗普却面临着越来越多的麻烦。过去几天内，特朗普政府接连迎来了 三大坏消息，这让他不得不紧急发布声明来稳定局势，而美国财长也公开暗示中国：不要不给美国面 子。 在分析这些坏消息之前，我们先来看看美国国内的局势。目前，美国的"内战"局势愈发严峻，芝加哥等 地爆发了大规模的暴力冲突。特朗普已经派遣了国民警卫队来进行镇压，但上百人的抗议队伍与移民 局、海关执法人员发生了剧烈冲突，甚至爆发了枪击事件。先是加利福尼亚州，接着是俄勒冈州和伊利 诺伊州，似乎所有由民主党主导的州都成为了特朗普政策的打击目标。 能导致美国债务危机提前爆发，进而引发经济风暴。如果美债问题失控，整个美国经济将遭遇巨大的冲 击。 而在外部，美国和欧洲的关系也在恶化。随着俄乌战争的持续，普京显然没有停止推动俄罗斯与欧洲的 矛盾。特朗普虽然口头上支持乌克兰，但依然坚持要求欧洲购买武器再向乌克兰提供援助，这无疑让美 国在经济上受益，而欧洲却为此付出了代价。长期下去，欧洲的内部矛盾会加剧，美欧之间的隔阂也会 越来越大，而这正是普京所期待的局面。 与此同时，欧洲国家对美国的信任逐渐动摇。意大利和瑞士近期分别邀请中国外长王毅访问，显 ...

Group 1 - The core argument is that the ongoing Ukraine war is a result of Europe's inability to confront a powerful Russia, which will not tolerate provocations from European nations after resolving the Ukraine issue [1][3] - The article suggests that the Ukraine war is fundamentally a confrontation between the US and Russia, with European countries merely supporting the US, leading to a breakdown of strategic balance in Europe [3][4] - Historical context indicates that Europe has been a source of global conflict for over 200 years, and the current geopolitical landscape is a result of European nations' own actions [3][4] Group 2 - The article argues that the safest period for Europe was during the US-Soviet standoff from 1945 to 1991, which was maintained by US intervention, not out of affection for Europe [4][5] - NATO's eastward expansion is portrayed as a strategy by the US to maintain control over Europe by creating insecurity, rather than enhancing European safety [4][5] - Russia's desire for peaceful coexistence has been ignored, leading to its resurgence as a major power willing to confront the US [5][6] Group 3 - The article categorizes European countries into five groups based on their historical ambitions and current geopolitical interests, highlighting the complexity of European unity [6][7][8] - Countries like Germany and France are seen as having ambitions for a unified Europe, while others like Poland and the Baltic states seek to regain lost territories [7][8] - Smaller nations tend to prioritize self-preservation and may not have the capacity to challenge Russia independently [8][9] Group 4 - The article critiques the notion that European unity can be achieved through current alliances, suggesting that the EU's decision-making process favors smaller nations' interests, hindering collective security [9][10] - It posits that the perception of Russia as a threat is largely a construct of US interests, rather than a reflection of historical realities [10][11] - The article concludes that Europe's best security strategy would be to pursue peaceful coexistence with Russia rather than relying on US protection [11][12]

Core Points - The meeting between US and Russian leaders on March 15 in Alaska did not result in any agreements, highlighting the ongoing complexities in US-Russia relations and the Ukraine issue [1][3] - Analysts suggest that both sides achieved certain diplomatic objectives despite the lack of a formal agreement, with Russia gaining a platform to alleviate sanctions pressure and the US enhancing its image of engagement [1][3] - The meeting is expected to intensify the geopolitical struggle surrounding Ukraine, as both nations have differing priorities and perspectives on the conflict [3][5] Group 1: Diplomatic Outcomes - The meeting allowed Russia to break through Western diplomatic isolation by receiving an invitation to the US, which is seen as a significant diplomatic gain [1] - The US, particularly under Trump's administration, aimed to project an image of attempting to mediate and improve US-Russia relations, aligning with domestic political expectations [1][3] Group 2: Geopolitical Implications - The absence of a ceasefire agreement or resolution to the Ukraine conflict indicates that the underlying tensions will continue to escalate, particularly with NATO's eastward expansion being a critical concern for Russia [3] - The meeting may create uncertainties in US-European relations, potentially leading to divisions within NATO as different parties have varying interests regarding the Ukraine situation [5]

Group 1 - The article discusses the ongoing trade tensions between the US and China, highlighting the recent extension of tariffs and the potential for a trade agreement [1][6][11] - It emphasizes the historical context of US-China relations, noting significant changes since the Nixon-Kissinger era, particularly China's rise as a competitive economic power [2][27] - The article mentions the impact of tariffs, with the US imposing up to 145% tariffs on Chinese goods and China retaliating with 125% tariffs, leading to a significant economic decoupling [5][6] Group 2 - The dialogue between the US and China is framed as essential for coexistence, with both nations needing to engage in discussions to resolve trade conflicts [4][10] - The potential for a new trade agreement is discussed, with the expectation that it should be detailed and long-lasting, ideally lasting several years [8][9][10] - The article also touches on the geopolitical implications of the trade relationship, including concerns over military and technological competition [28][27] Group 3 - The article reflects on the broader implications of US foreign policy under Trump, particularly regarding transatlantic relations and the perception of Europe [20][22] - It suggests that Trump's approach has damaged the US's image in Europe and that rebuilding trust will take time and effort [22][23] - The discussion includes the need for a multilateral approach to global order, indicating that a new world order cannot be established solely by the US and China [12][24]