Prompt Engineering

Search documents
AI搜索的未来不是“十个蓝色链接”,而是直接给你答案
Hu Xiu· 2025-07-25 04:16
Group 1 - Aravind Srinivas, co-founder and CEO of Perplexity AI, emphasizes the importance of citation and source attribution in AI-generated content to avoid plagiarism [6][8][10] - Perplexity AI differentiates itself from traditional search engines like Google by focusing on direct answers to user queries rather than link-based searches [16][17][18] - The company aims to enhance user experience by continuously improving its citation mechanisms and expanding its functionalities, such as real-time sports scores [19][20][22] Group 2 - Perplexity AI has faced legal challenges, including accusations of being a "content kleptocracy," but the company maintains a stance of openness to collaboration with content creators [25][26][28] - The company has introduced the Perplexity Publisher Program, which aims to share advertising revenue with content providers when their material is used in responses [28][29] - Perplexity AI's business model is centered around advertising revenue, distinguishing it from traditional search engines that do not share profits with media outlets [28][29][36] Group 3 - The company is focused on understanding user needs through data analysis to improve its offerings and compete with established search engines [23][24] - Perplexity AI is exploring various monetization strategies beyond subscription models, aiming for a sustainable business approach as costs decrease over time [35][36] - The CEO expresses that the AI industry is evolving, and while competition with Google is anticipated, the focus remains on building trust and providing value to users [37]
深度|Perplexity CEO专访:AI搜索的未来不是“十个蓝色链接”,而是直接给你答案
Z Potentials· 2025-07-25 03:24
Core Viewpoint - Perplexity AI emphasizes the importance of citation and source attribution in its AI-generated content, distinguishing itself from traditional search engines like Google by focusing on providing direct answers to user queries rather than merely linking to sources [6][10][14]. Group 1: Definition of Plagiarism and Citation Practices - Perplexity AI defines plagiarism as the failure to properly attribute sources, and it aims to provide clear citations for the information it presents [6][7]. - The platform has been designed to summarize and synthesize information from various sources while ensuring that users can easily identify where the information originated [10][11]. - The company has implemented a source panel and footnotes to enhance the clarity of citations, which has been a core feature since its launch [7][10]. Group 2: Differentiation from Google - Perplexity AI operates fundamentally differently from Google, which is primarily a link-based search engine focused on generating ad revenue through clicks on links [14][15]. - Users of Perplexity tend to input longer, more specific queries, averaging around 10 to 11 words, compared to Google's average of 2.7 words per search [15][16]. - The platform aims to reshape user search habits by providing comprehensive answers rather than just links, addressing a gap in the current search engine market [20][21]. Group 3: Product Development and User Engagement - Perplexity AI has rapidly introduced new features based on user feedback and data analysis, focusing on areas such as sports and finance to meet user needs [17][20]. - The company initially targeted academic and research-oriented users but aims to broaden its appeal to a wider audience by enhancing the depth and accuracy of its content [19][20]. - The platform's goal is to replace traditional search interfaces by providing a more intuitive and informative user experience [20][21]. Group 4: Legal and Business Model Considerations - Perplexity AI has faced legal challenges regarding its content usage, but it maintains that it operates within legal boundaries by not incorporating content into its training models [22][23]. - The company has introduced the Perplexity Publisher Program to establish revenue-sharing agreements with content creators, differentiating itself from traditional content licensing models [24][26]. - Perplexity AI's business model is centered around advertising revenue, with a commitment to share profits with publishers whose content is referenced in user queries [24][26]. Group 5: Future Outlook and Market Position - The company believes that the future of information retrieval will be AI-native, and it is focused on refining its product to capture a share of the market currently dominated by Google [21][31]. - Perplexity AI aims to build trust with users and advertisers, ensuring that its platform remains a safe and effective space for information retrieval and advertising [32][31]. - The company acknowledges the challenges of competing with established platforms but is optimistic about its growth potential as it continues to innovate and adapt to user needs [30][31].
POC to PROD: Hard Lessons from 200+ Enterprise GenAI Deployments - Randall Hunt, Caylent
AI Engineer· 2025-07-23 15:50
Core Business & Services - Kalin builds custom solutions for clients, ranging from Fortune 500 companies to startups, focusing on app development and database migrations [1][2] - The company leverages generative AI to automate business functions, such as intelligent document processing for logistics management, achieving faster and better results than human annotators [20][21] - Kalin offers services ranging from chatbot and co-pilot development to AI agent creation, tailoring solutions to specific client needs [16] Technology & Architecture - The company utilizes multimodal search and semantic understanding of videos, employing models like Nova Pro and Titan v2 for indexing and searching video content [6][7] - Kalin uses various databases including Postgress, PG vector, and OpenSearch for vector search implementations [13] - The company builds AI systems on AWS, utilizing services like Bedrock and SageMaker, and custom silicon like Tranium and Inferentia for price performance improvements of approximately 60% over Nvidia GPUs [27] AI Development & Strategy - Prompt engineering has proven highly effective, sometimes negating the need for fine-tuning models [40] - Context management is crucial for differentiating applications, leveraging user data and history to make strategic inferences [33][34] - UX design is important for mitigating the slowness of inference, with techniques like caching and UI spinners improving user experience [36][37]
2万行App代码,Claude写了95%!老开发者:每月只花200美元,就像一天多出5小时,IDE要“变天”了!
猿大侠· 2025-07-10 04:10
Core Viewpoint - The development landscape is undergoing a significant transformation with the advent of AI programming tools like Claude Code, which can autonomously handle coding tasks, leading to a redefinition of developer roles and skills required in the industry [1][5]. Group 1: AI Programming Tools Evolution - The initial experience with AI coding tools began with GitHub Copilot, which significantly enhanced coding efficiency by providing context-aware function completions [2][3]. - The emergence of new competitors like Cursor and Windsurf has shifted the focus towards agentic development models, allowing AI to perform complex tasks through iterative processes [3][4]. - Claude Code stands out as a terminal-focused IDE that fully replaces traditional coding environments, emphasizing an agentic approach to development [4][7]. Group 2: Practical Application of Claude Code - A complete macOS application named Context was developed using Claude Code, with 95% of the code generated by the AI, demonstrating its capability to manage the entire development process [1][5]. - The productivity boost from using Claude Code is substantial, allowing projects that previously took months to be completed in a week [5][56]. - The application of Claude Code has led to a reevaluation of the skills necessary for developers, shifting the focus from specific programming languages to problem-solving abilities and system design [5][6]. Group 3: Code Quality and Development Process - Claude Code exhibits a strong ability to write code, often outperforming average developers, and can autonomously handle tasks such as code generation, testing, and debugging [13][14]. - The AI's proficiency in Swift and SwiftUI is notable, although it occasionally struggles with modern frameworks, highlighting the need for user guidance to optimize output [15][16]. - Effective use of Claude Code requires clear specifications and context, as the quality of generated code is heavily dependent on the clarity of the input provided by the user [31][32]. Group 4: Context Management and Feedback Loops - The concept of context engineering is crucial for maximizing the effectiveness of AI tools, as managing the context window can significantly impact the quality of results [24][27]. - Implementing feedback loops allows Claude Code to iteratively improve code quality through testing and debugging, although some manual intervention is still necessary [39][41]. - The ability to generate mock data quickly enhances the development process, allowing for effective UI prototyping even in the absence of real data [44][46]. Group 5: Future of Development Environments - The traditional IDE model is likely to evolve, with future environments focusing on context management and feedback mechanisms rather than conventional code editing features [53][54]. - The integration of AI into development processes is expected to redefine the role of developers, making it essential to adapt to new tools and methodologies [56][57].
推出4个月就狂赚3亿?!百万用户应用CTO弃Copilot转Claude Code:200美元拯救我的137个应用
AI前线· 2025-07-07 06:57
Core Insights - Anthropic's AI coding assistant, Claude Code, has gained significant traction, attracting 115,000 developers and processing 195 million lines of code weekly, marking it as one of the fastest-growing developer tools in the AI coding market [1][2] - The estimated annual revenue for Claude Code, based on a user payment model of approximately $1,000 per year, is projected to reach $130 million, with $43 million generated in just four months since its launch [1][2] - Developers are switching from other AI coding assistants to Claude Code due to its superior prompt quality, tool integration, and context management capabilities, which enhance productivity and reduce errors [2][3] Group 1 - Claude Code operates on a typical SaaS model with tiered subscription plans, catering to both independent developers and enterprise teams, which enhances user retention [3] - The market for AI coding tools is vast, with potential annual recurring revenue (ARR) estimates ranging from $50 million to $100 million, driven by team and enterprise subscriptions [3] - Claude Code's unique terminal-first design differentiates it from competitors like GitHub Copilot, targeting engineers who prefer command-line operations and seek transparency in model reasoning [3][4] Group 2 - A developer successfully built a macOS application, Context, using Claude Code, with only about 1,000 lines of code manually written out of 20,000, showcasing the tool's efficiency [4][5] - Claude Code's ability to generate high-quality Swift code and manage UI design effectively, despite some limitations, indicates its potential in modern application development [17][19] - The tool's feedback loop allows for iterative development, enabling users to build, test, and refine applications efficiently, which is crucial for modern software development [29][30] Group 3 - The emergence of prompt engineering as a new discipline highlights the importance of well-crafted prompts to maximize the output quality from AI models [21][22] - Claude Code's context window of 200,000 tokens allows it to handle extensive input, but managing this context effectively is essential for optimal performance [22][23] - The future of IDEs is expected to shift towards integrating AI-driven feedback loops, reducing reliance on traditional code editors and enhancing developer productivity [35][37]
程序员还写啥前端?Claude 工程师凌晨2点造出Artifacts:AI直接生成可交互App,现在又重磅升级了
AI前线· 2025-07-01 05:24
Core Viewpoint - Anthropic has upgraded its tool Artifacts, making it easier for users to create interactive AI applications without programming skills, marking a significant shift towards practical tool platforms for AI [1][2][14]. Summary by Sections Introduction of Artifacts - Artifacts allows Claude users to create small AI programming applications for personal use, with millions of users having created over 500 million "artifacts" since its launch [2][4]. Development and Functionality - Initially designed for website generation, the Artifacts feature has evolved to simplify sharing and enhance the power of applications developed using it [5][8]. - The development process was rapid, taking only a week and a half from prototype to internal testing, showcasing the potential for human-AI collaboration [7][8]. User Experience and Feedback - Users have reported positive experiences with Artifacts, likening it to a "build-on-demand" concept, which eliminates the need for traditional tools like Zappia [20][21]. - The new Artifacts experience is accessible on both mobile and desktop devices, allowing users to create, view, and customize their projects easily [16][31]. Competitive Landscape - Artifacts represents a fundamental shift in AI-user interaction, moving from static responses to dynamic experiences, intensifying competition with OpenAI's Canvas feature [17][18]. - Unlike traditional AI interactions that require copying and pasting results, Artifacts creates a dedicated workspace for immediate use and sharing of AI-generated content [18]. Market Trends and Future Outlook - The rise of low-code and no-code technologies is expected to democratize application development, with a significant increase in "citizen developers" who can create applications without formal programming training [33]. - The relationship between AI development tools and traditional programming is seen as complementary, with professional developers focusing on complex systems that require custom features and enterprise-level performance [34]. Business Model and Community Engagement - Anthropic's strategy includes offering free access to the updated Artifacts experience, encouraging community participation and user engagement, which reflects a broader trend in the AI service industry [31][32].
Prompt Engineering is Dead — Nir Gazit, Traceloop
AI Engineer· 2025-06-27 09:34
Core Argument - The presentation challenges the notion of "prompt engineering" as a true engineering discipline, suggesting that iterative prompt improvement can be automated [1][2] - The speaker advocates for an alternative approach to prompt optimization, emphasizing the use of evaluators and automated agents [23] Methodology & Implementation - The company developed a chatbot for its website documentation using a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline [2] - The RAG pipeline consists of a Chroma database, OpenAI, and prompts to answer questions about the documentation [7] - An evaluator was built to assess the RAG pipeline's responses, using a dataset of questions and expected answers [5][7] - The evaluator uses a ground truth-based LLM as a judge, checking if the generated answers contain specific facts [10][13] - An agent was created to automatically improve prompts by researching online guides, running evaluations, and regenerating prompts based on failure reasons [5][18][19] - The agent uses Crew AI to think, call the evaluator, and regenerate prompts based on best practices [20] Results & Future Considerations - The initial score of the prompt was 0.4 (40%), and after two iterations with the agent, the score improved to 0.9 (90%) [21][22] - The company acknowledges the risk of overfitting to the training data (20 examples) and suggests splitting the data into train/test sets for better generalization [24][25] - Future work may involve applying the same automated optimization techniques to the evaluator and agent prompts [27] - The demo is available in the trace loop/autoprompting demo repository [27]
Model Maxxing: RFT, DPO, SFT with OpenAI — Ilan Bigio, OpenAI
AI Engineer· 2025-06-17 03:49
AI Model Fine-Tuning and Prompt Engineering - Workshop covers SFT, DPO, RFT, prompt engineering/optimization, and agent scaffolding [1] OpenAI Expertise - Ilan Bigio, a founding member of OpenAI's Developer Experience team, leads technical development for Swarm, the precursor to the Agents SDK [1] - Ilan Bigio contributed to Codex CLI and created the AI phone ordering demo showcased at DevDay 2024 [1] - Ilan Bigio partnered with companies like Cursor, Khan Academy, and Klarna to shape their AI products [1] AI Application and Development - Ilan Bigio created ShellAI, an open-source, AI-powered terminal assistant [1] - OpenAI provides in-depth technical guides on topics like Function Calling, Latency Optimization, and Agent Orchestration [1] Educational Background - Ilan Bigio designed and taught courses at Brown [1]
State-Of-The-Art Prompting For AI Agents
Y Combinator· 2025-05-30 14:00
Prompt Engineering & Metaprompting - Metaprompting is emerging as a powerful tool, likened to coding in 1995 due to the evolving nature of the tools [1] - The best prompts often start by defining the role of the LLM, detailing the task, and outlining a step-by-step plan, often using markdown-style formatting [1] - Vertical AI agent companies are exploring how to balance flexibility for customer-specific logic with maintaining a general-purpose product, considering forking and merging prompts [1] - An emerging architecture involves defining a system prompt (company API), a developer prompt (customer-specific context), and a user prompt (end-user input) [1] - Worked examples are crucial for improving output quality, and automating the process of extracting and ingesting these examples from customer data is a valuable opportunity [2] - Prompt folding allows a prompt to dynamically generate better versions of itself by feeding it examples where it failed [2] - When LLMs lack sufficient information, it's important to provide them with an "escape hatch" to avoid hallucinations, either by allowing them to ask for more information or by providing debug info in the response [2] Evaluation & Model Personalities - Evals are considered the "crown jewels" for AI companies, essential for understanding why a prompt was written a certain way and for improving it [3] - Different LLMs exhibit distinct personalities; for example, Claude is considered more steerable, while Llama 4 requires more steering and prompting [5] - When using LLMs to generate numerical scores, providing rubrics is best practice, but models may interpret and apply these rubrics with varying degrees of rigidity and flexibility [5] Founder Role & Forward Deployed Engineer - Founders need to deeply understand their users and codify these insights into specific evals to ensure the software works for them [3] - Founders should act as "forward deployed engineers," directly engaging with users to understand their needs and rapidly iterate on the product [4] - The forward deployed engineer model, combined with AI, enables faster iteration and closing of significant deals with large enterprises [5]