外交部：中方不接受菲方的无理指责和所谓的抗议 les & FR 点击下载中国基金报客户端 ■ 中国基金报内容矩阵 ■ 9月11日，外交部发言人林剑主持例行记者会。 路透社记者提问，菲律宾外交部表示，强烈抗议中国在黄岩岛设立自然保护区的计划，并称 菲律宾将对所谓中国的"非法行为"进行正式交涉。中方对此有何回应？ "黄岩岛是中国的黄岩岛，建立黄岩岛国家级自然保护区，是中方主权范围内的事，旨在保 护黄岩岛的生态环境，维护黄岩岛自然生态系统多样性、稳定性、持续性，符合中国国内法 和国际法，也充分体现中方作为负责任大国，积极保护生态环境，推动实现可持续发展的使 命担当。"林剑表示。 林剑指出，菲律宾的领土范围早已由一系列国际条约确定。黄岩岛从来不在其中。 中方不 接受菲方的无理指责和所谓的抗议，敦促菲方切实停止有关侵权挑衅和肆意炒作，避免给海 上局势增添复杂因素。 来源：北京日报 巅峰对话 投资热点说 ETF风向标 IPO情报站 fe o 1 ■ a a - 444 and 4 4 CHINAFUND CHINAFUND CHINAFUND CHINAFUND 开盘速递 港股日报 全球早班车 数说人物 √ � [ 8 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly rejects the Philippines' accusations and protests regarding the establishment of a nature reserve at Huangyan Island, asserting that it is within China's sovereign rights to protect the ecological environment of the area [1] Group 1: China's Position - The establishment of a national-level nature reserve at Huangyan Island is aimed at protecting the ecological environment and maintaining the diversity, stability, and sustainability of the natural ecosystem [1] - China's actions are in accordance with both domestic and international law, reflecting its commitment as a responsible major power to environmental protection and sustainable development [1] Group 2: Philippines' Claims - The Philippines has expressed strong opposition to China's plans, labeling them as "illegal actions" and intends to formally engage in diplomatic discussions regarding these claims [1] - The territorial boundaries of the Philippines have been established by a series of international treaties, which do not include Huangyan Island [1] Group 3: Call for Restraint - China urges the Philippines to cease provocative actions and refrain from escalating tensions in the maritime region [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government asserts its sovereignty over Huangyan Island and defends the establishment of a national-level nature reserve as a legitimate action aimed at ecological protection, rejecting the Philippines' protests as unfounded [1] Group 1: Sovereignty and Territorial Claims - The Chinese government emphasizes that Huangyan Island is an inherent part of its territory, and the creation of the nature reserve falls within its sovereign rights [1] - The Philippines' territorial boundaries have been established by a series of international treaties, which do not include Huangyan Island [1] Group 2: Environmental Protection and Responsibility - The establishment of the nature reserve is intended to protect the ecological environment and maintain the diversity, stability, and sustainability of Huangyan Island's natural ecosystem, aligning with both domestic and international laws [1] - The Chinese government positions itself as a responsible major power committed to ecological protection and sustainable development [1] Group 3: Diplomatic Relations and Tensions - The Chinese government urges the Philippines to cease its provocative actions and avoid complicating the maritime situation [1]

林剑：黄岩岛是中国的固有领土，建立黄岩岛国家级自然保护区是中方主权范围内的事，旨在保护黄岩 岛的生态环境，维护黄岩岛自然生态系统多样性、稳定性、持续性，符合中国国内法和国际法，也充分 体现中方作为负责任大国积极保护生态环境、推动实现可持续发展的使命担当。 外交部：建立黄岩岛国家级自然保护区是中方主权范围内的事，不接受菲方无理指责 中新网北京9月11日电(记者邢翀)中国外交部发言人林剑9月11日主持例行记者会。 有记者提问：菲律宾外交部表示，对中国计划在黄岩岛建立国家级自然保护区表示"强烈抗议"。中方对 此有何回应？ 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 菲律宾的领土范围早已由一系列国际条约确定，黄岩岛从来不在其中。中方不接受菲方的无理指责和所 谓的"抗议"，敦促菲方切实停止有关侵权挑衅和肆意炒作，避免给海上局势增添复杂因素。(完) 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 来源：中国新闻网 编辑：郭晋嘉 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Lebanese cabinet approved a military proposal to disarm Hezbollah and bring all weapons under state control, despite opposition from some ministers and potential public unrest [1] Group 1: Government Actions - The Lebanese cabinet held a meeting on September 5 to discuss and approve the military's proposal for disarming Hezbollah [1] - The Minister of Information, Paul Morkos, stated that the cabinet would keep the details of the proposal confidential and that the military would begin implementation based on existing logistical, financial, and human resources [1] - The military is expected to provide monthly progress reports to the cabinet regarding the disarmament plan [1] Group 2: Opposition and Reactions - Five ministers affiliated with Hezbollah and its ally, the Amal Movement, withdrew from the cabinet meeting in protest against the disarmament proposal [1] - Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem reiterated the group's refusal to disarm and urged the Lebanese government to incorporate Hezbollah into the national defense strategy to strengthen national sovereignty [1] - Following the cabinet's decision, Hezbollah supporters called for large-scale protests to resist the disarmament of their weapons [1] Group 3: Security Context - In light of potential instability, the Lebanese military has increased troop deployments in various regions [1] - Since the outbreak of renewed Israeli-Palestinian conflict in October 2023, Hezbollah has conducted attacks on northern Israel, supporting Hamas in the Gaza conflict [1] - Israel has retaliated with airstrikes and shelling in southern Lebanon, including Beirut, despite a ceasefire agreement reached in November 2024 [1]

Core Points - The commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War was held in Beijing, emphasizing the importance of national sovereignty [1] - Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar highlighted the necessity of defending and maintaining a country's sovereignty amidst ongoing geopolitical instability [3] - Anwar's remarks were made following his visit to Tianjin and Beijing, where he attended the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit [3]

习近平：加快建设世界一流军队，坚决维护国家主权、统一、领土完整，为实现中华民族伟大复兴提供战略支撑，为世界和平与发展作出更大贡献。中华民族伟大复兴势不可挡！人类和平与发展的崇高事业必将胜利！ ...

Core Viewpoint - Cuba's Foreign Ministry strongly condemns the U.S. military deployment in the Caribbean under the pretext of combating drug trafficking, viewing it as a serious threat and an aggressive display of force against the sovereignty and self-determination of Latin America and the Caribbean [1] Summary by Relevant Sections - **U.S. Military Actions** The U.S. has deployed warships off the coast of Venezuela, citing the fight against drug trafficking as the reason, which has provoked a strong reaction from Venezuela [1] - **Cuba's Response** Cuba's statement refutes U.S. claims linking the Venezuelan government and President Maduro to illegal drug trafficking organizations, labeling these accusations as baseless and absurd excuses that have historically led to brutal invasions [1] - **Drug Trafficking Context** The statement references the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime's "World Drug Report 2025," accusing the U.S. of being the "largest drug market in the region and even globally" [1] - **Commitment to Sovereignty** Cuba reaffirms its commitment to effectively combat illegal drug trafficking, defend national sovereignty, and promote peace and stability in Latin America and the Caribbean [1]

Core Viewpoint - The United States has deployed military forces near Venezuela, citing a need to combat drug trafficking, while Venezuela's government perceives this as an act of aggression and interference in its internal affairs [1][2][5]. Military Deployment - The U.S. has sent a significant naval presence to the Caribbean, including amphibious assault ships, destroyers, and potentially a nuclear submarine, with the aim of addressing threats from drug trafficking organizations in Latin America [2][12]. - The military buildup is described as a show of force rather than an immediate plan for direct military action against drug cartels, although it provides options for U.S. commanders [2][19]. Venezuelan Response - Venezuelan President Maduro has condemned the U.S. actions, stating that the country will prepare to defend its sovereignty and has initiated a national conscription program to bolster its military capabilities [3][6][4]. - Maduro claims that over 4 million citizens are already part of the Bolivarian militia, emphasizing the nation's commitment to peace while rejecting any form of foreign intervention [4][11]. Regional Reactions - Several Latin American countries have expressed strong opposition to the U.S. military presence, viewing it as a threat to regional stability and sovereignty [12][15]. - Leaders from Colombia, Brazil, and Mexico have voiced concerns that U.S. intervention could lead to further conflict and instability in the region, with calls for diplomatic solutions instead of military actions [15][18][19]. Diplomatic Context - Venezuela's Foreign Minister has labeled U.S. accusations of drug trafficking as malicious and unfounded, asserting that the country has been actively combating organized crime since the expulsion of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration in 2005 [5][8]. - The situation has drawn international attention, with calls for restraint and dialogue from various global leaders, including the United Nations [18][19].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that Brazil's Finance Minister Fernando Haddad stated that the trade negotiations between Brazil and the U.S. are at a standstill due to the U.S. imposing high tariffs on certain Brazilian goods, which may lead to a further decline in trade volume between the two countries [1][3] - Haddad accused the U.S. of linking trade issues to the judicial cases of former Brazilian President Bolsonaro, suggesting that the U.S. is using tariff threats to impose an unconstitutional solution on Brazil [3] - The Brazilian government has formally rejected the legitimacy of the U.S. investigation, asserting that the U.S. "301 investigation" lacks legal and factual basis [3] Group 2 - The U.S. State Department's Western Hemisphere Affairs Bureau labeled Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes as "toxic" for businesses and individuals seeking to enter the U.S. market, emphasizing that no foreign court can overturn U.S. sanctions [3] - Following a ruling by Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Flávio Dino, which was interpreted as an attempt to block the application of the U.S. Magnitsky Act against de Moraes, the U.S. response indicates heightened tensions between the two nations [3][4] - Dino stated that judicial decisions from other countries must be recognized by Brazilian judicial institutions to be effective in Brazil, warning against violations of national sovereignty [4]