【#委代总统宣誓将解救马杜罗#】#马杜罗被美国强行控制一周后# 当地时间10日，委官方密集表态谴 责美国，要求美国尊重委内瑞拉国家主权、释放委内瑞拉总统马杜罗及其夫人，并表示会坚决维护国家 尊严与和平。委内瑞拉代总统德尔茜·罗德里格斯发表公开讲话，向全国民众宣誓将解救被美方强行控 制的总统马杜罗。她强调委内瑞拉"并没有沉睡"，正在为总统重返祖国而持续奋斗。罗德里格斯同时呼 吁美国尊重委内瑞拉及加勒比地区的和平，指出1月3日发生的事件是对委内瑞拉人民的严重伤害，并将 成为双边关系史上的负面一页。委内瑞拉外长伊万·希尔同日发表声明，重申国家对主权、尊严与和平 的坚持，明确反对干涉主义论调，并强烈驳斥将委内瑞拉指控为"毒品贩运国家"的说法，称相关指控缺 乏事实依据，已被现实情况所否定。委内瑞拉全国选举委员会发布决议，谴责美国政府及军队于1月3日 实施的非法武装入侵。该机构指出，有关行为严重侵犯国家主权和领土完整，违反国际法基本原则。委 员会同时强调将与委内瑞拉人民站在一起，并向遇难者家属致以哀悼。 来源： 央视新闻 ...

当地时间1月10日，墨西哥民众在首都墨西哥城举行大规模游行活动，声援包括委内瑞拉在内的拉丁美 洲多国人民，反对美国在该地区推行霸权主义和干涉主义政策。 数千人的游行队伍高举标语和横幅，高喊反对外来干涉、要求尊重各国主权的口号。示威者手持委内瑞 拉国旗，表达对委内瑞拉人民的支持，要求美国停止对委内瑞拉的政治和外交施压，谴责美国以"民 主""安全""禁毒"等名义干涉他国内政，并反对任何形式的军事威胁。 （文章来源：央视新闻） 美国总统特朗普近日称，美国"必须对墨西哥采取行动"，因为"毒品正涌入墨西哥"，墨西哥必须采取行 动打击毒品走私。相关言论进一步加剧地区紧张局势，也引发拉美社会对美国以安全名义推行霸权政策 的强烈警惕。 ...

2025年12月底，因伊朗货币里亚尔持续贬值，物价快速上涨，部分伊朗商户发起示威活动。目前，示威已蔓延至伊朗多个省份，美以两国领导人 随后相继就此发表干预性言论。内塔尼亚胡4日称，以色列人"认同"伊朗人的斗争。另据以总理办公室4日发表的声明，内塔尼亚胡去年底访美期 间曾与美国总统特朗普讨论伊朗核问题，双方重申要求伊朗完全放弃铀浓缩活动的立场。在内塔尼亚胡访美前，他还提到可能向特朗普提出对伊 朗再次发动袭击的可能性。 【环球时报报道 记者 周扬】据法新社5日报道，在以色列总理内塔尼亚胡表示支持伊朗境内抗议活动后，伊朗政府5日批评以色列试图破坏伊朗的 国家团结。 报道称，伊朗外交部5日谴责美以官员近期就伊朗国内骚乱发表干涉主义言论，指出此类言论违反国际准则，旨在煽动暴力行为。据伊通社报道， 伊朗外交部发言人巴加埃在当天的记者会上表示："毫无疑问，以色列和美国正试图在施加经济压力的同时，营造一种煽动性的舆论氛围，以制造 分裂、破坏我们的国家团结。针对伊朗的心理战和舆论战是其对伊施压策略的一部分，这并非新鲜事。伊朗政府正在密切而且谨慎地监控对方各 方面的行为。" ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent statement by President Trump declaring the airspace over Venezuela as "fully closed" has sparked strong reactions from the Venezuelan government and other Latin American countries, viewing it as a colonial threat and an act of aggression [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and Reactions - Trump's declaration on social media targeted airlines, pilots, drug traffickers, and human traffickers, indicating a significant escalation in U.S. military posture towards Venezuela [3]. - The Venezuelan government condemned the U.S. actions as unilateral and contrary to international law, urging global condemnation [3]. - Colombian President Petro emphasized that no foreign president has the authority to close another country's airspace, warning against the implications for national sovereignty and international law [3]. Group 2: Military Deployment and Strategy - The U.S. has reportedly increased military presence in the Caribbean, deploying advanced naval assets and conducting operations against suspected drug trafficking vessels, with at least 21 attacks resulting in 83 fatalities since September [5]. - Analysts suggest that the U.S. aims to isolate Venezuela and disrupt its logistics, thereby increasing pressure on President Maduro [1][5]. - Former U.S. military officials expressed concerns about the feasibility and resource requirements of establishing a no-fly zone over Venezuela, indicating that the declaration raises more questions than it answers [4]. Group 3: Legal and Ethical Concerns - Reports emerged regarding U.S. military operations that may have violated international law, with calls for accountability for actions taken against alleged drug traffickers [6]. - The U.S. Secretary of Defense defended military actions, labeling criticisms as "fake news," amidst growing scrutiny over the legality of these operations [7]. Group 4: Political Implications - Trump's recent communications with Maduro and the simultaneous announcement of pardoning a former Honduran president have raised questions about the consistency of U.S. foreign policy towards Latin America [8]. - Democratic lawmakers criticized the administration's narrative on drug trafficking, suggesting it reflects a broader inconsistency in U.S. strategy in the region [8].

Group 1 - The deployment of the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier in the Caribbean, under the pretext of combating drug trafficking, raises questions about the underlying geopolitical motives of the U.S. government [1][2] - Historical context shows that the U.S. has a long history of military interventions in Latin America, with nearly 400 interventions globally since 1776, 34% of which targeted Latin America and the Caribbean [2] - The USS Ford's presence is perceived as a demonstration of U.S. military power, signaling that the U.S. can still enforce its will in its "backyard" [2][3] Group 2 - The U.S. military buildup in the Caribbean is viewed as a significant threat to peace and stability in the Western Hemisphere, suggesting that non-compliant regimes may face military consequences [3] - The narrative of "fighting drugs" is seen as a facade for U.S. interventionism, with the real intent being the protection of U.S. interests and hegemony in the region [2][3] - The changing dynamics in Latin America, characterized by greater sovereignty and diverse development, challenge the effectiveness of traditional U.S. interventionist strategies [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Mexican President López Obrador firmly defends the principle of self-determination for nations in response to U.S. President Trump's comments regarding CIA operations in Venezuela, emphasizing opposition to foreign intervention and interference [1] Group 1: Mexican Government's Position - President López Obrador states that the Mexican government will uphold constitutional principles and defend the right to self-determination, opposing interventionism and acts of aggression [1] - The Mexican government condemns U.S. interference in Latin American affairs and calls for respect for the self-determination of all nations [1] Group 2: U.S. Actions and Reactions - On October 15, President Trump authorized the CIA to conduct operations in Venezuela and is considering ground actions against drug trafficking in the country [1] - The Venezuelan government strongly condemns these actions, asserting that they pose a threat not only to Venezuela but to the entire region, and has lodged protests with international organizations [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Mexican President, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, opposes foreign intervention in sovereign nations' internal affairs, particularly in response to the U.S. military deployment in the Caribbean aimed at combating drug trafficking [1] Group 1: Mexican Government's Stance - President López Obrador emphasizes that Mexico will never support foreign intervention in sovereign nations [1] - The Mexican government is committed to adhering to diplomatic principles based on respect for sovereignty, self-determination, and peaceful conflict resolution [1] - The President firmly opposes interventionism and advocates for the defense of national self-determination rights [1] Group 2: U.S. Military Actions - Recent reports indicate that President Trump has secretly authorized military actions against drug trafficking organizations in Latin America, including Mexico [1] - On August 25, it was revealed that the U.S. has ordered an increase in naval presence in the South Caribbean to support these military operations [1] - President López Obrador responded strongly on August 8, stating that U.S. troops would not enter Mexican territory [1]