Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the challenges faced by Taiwan under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), highlighting issues such as media manipulation, political oppression, and economic decline [1] - The new Kuomintang (KMT) chairperson, Zheng Liwen, calls for urgent action to prevent further societal division and economic deterioration in Taiwan, advocating for a return to economic prosperity and cross-strait peace [1] - The KMT's commitment to promoting cross-strait exchanges and cooperation is reiterated, aligning with the expectations of the majority of the Taiwanese people for stability and development [1] Group 2 - The KMT maintains its stance on the "1992 Consensus" and opposes "Taiwan independence," aiming to ease tensions and foster peaceful development of cross-strait relations [1] - The party's leadership transition was marked by the handover of the seal from former chairman Zhu Lilun to the new chairperson Zheng Liwen, with notable attendance from previous party leaders and public figures [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the new leadership of the Kuomintang (KMT) under Zheng Liwen, emphasizing the party's commitment to economic revival and cross-strait peace amidst concerns over the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) governance and its impact on Taiwan's democracy and economy [1][2]. Group 1 - Zheng Liwen, the new KMT chairperson, criticized the DPP for spreading rumors and creating division, claiming that Taiwan's democracy is at risk and its core industries are being hollowed out [1]. - The KMT aims to take on the responsibility of correcting the current political course and fostering economic miracles in Taiwan while maintaining peace across the Taiwan Strait [1]. - The KMT's party report emphasizes its commitment to promoting cross-strait exchanges and cooperation, aligning with the expectations of the majority of Taiwanese people for peace and stability [2]. Group 2 - The KMT maintains its stance on the "1992 Consensus" and opposes "Taiwan independence," aiming to ease tensions and promote peaceful development of cross-strait relations [2]. - The party's leadership transition included the appointment of four vice chairpersons, indicating a structured approach to governance and party unity [2].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the concerns raised by the new Kuomintang (KMT) chairperson, Zheng Liwen, regarding the current political climate in Taiwan, emphasizing the threats to democracy and economic stability posed by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) [2] - Zheng Liwen criticized the DPP for using media to spread rumors and create division, stating that Taiwan's core industries are at risk of being hollowed out due to prolonged internal strife [2] - The KMT aims to take on the responsibility of correcting the current political course and is committed to fostering economic miracles and maintaining peace across the Taiwan Strait [2][3] Group 2 - The KMT's recent conference appointed four vice chairpersons, indicating a strategic leadership structure aimed at promoting cross-strait communication and cooperation [3] - The party's report emphasizes its commitment to the "1992 Consensus" and opposition to "Taiwan independence," which aligns with the expectations of the majority of Taiwanese people for peace and stability [3] - The transition of leadership from former chairperson Zhu Lilun to Zheng Liwen was marked by a formal handover of authority, showcasing continuity in the party's objectives [3]

Core Viewpoint - Recent articles from American think tanks and media criticize Taiwan's leader Lai Ching-te for his reckless behavior and suggest a "gradual unification" approach, raising significant attention and interpretation within Taiwan [1][2][3]. Group 1: Criticism of Lai Ching-te - Lai Ching-te is labeled as a "troublemaker" and "peace destroyer" by Chinese officials, with accusations of provoking tensions through his refusal to acknowledge the "1992 Consensus" and promoting "Taiwan independence" [1]. - The U.S. think tank RAND Corporation's report emphasizes the need for Taiwan to act with restraint to avoid escalating tensions with mainland China, highlighting Lai's provocative statements as a contributing factor to instability [2][3]. Group 2: Shift in U.S. Perspective - Articles from U.S. media indicate a shift from hawkish to more restrained views regarding Taiwan, suggesting that while Taiwan is important to U.S. interests, it is not a critical survival issue [4]. - The term "troublemaker 2.0" is used to describe Lai Ching-te, reflecting a growing distrust in his leadership due to his emphasis on "new two-state theory" and ideological rigidity [8]. Group 3: Implications for Taiwan's Future - Analysts warn that Lai's continued provocative stance could lead to adverse consequences for Taiwan, as the U.S. may not provide the expected support in the event of a conflict [5][7]. - The collective anxiety among the Taiwanese public regarding U.S. defense commitments is rising, with increasing skepticism about the reliability of American support [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the significance of the year 2028 for cross-strait relations, highlighting that the mainland has presented a "peaceful bottom line" with a focus on zero tariffs for Taiwanese goods entering the mainland market after unification [2][16]. Summary by Sections Section 1: Zero Tariffs and Economic Benefits - The article states that once the cross-strait common market is established, all Taiwanese goods entering the mainland will enjoy zero tariffs, which is seen as a major benefit for Taiwan [3][11]. - The mainland's market is described as vast, suggesting that it can easily absorb Taiwanese products, enhancing economic ties [3]. Section 2: Political Context and Dialogue - The commentary by Zhong Taiwen addresses the recent statements by the newly elected Kuomintang chairperson Zheng Liwen regarding the "1992 Consensus," aiming to clarify and complete the understanding of this consensus [7]. - There is a call for dialogue among all Taiwanese political figures, emphasizing that as long as they do not advocate for independence and recognize the shared identity of being Chinese, communication is possible [8][10]. Section 3: Future Prospects of Unification - The article discusses the prospects of unification, stating that after peaceful unification, Taiwan's current social system and way of life will be respected, with guarantees for private property, religious beliefs, and legal rights [11]. - The emphasis on "patriots governing Taiwan" and high autonomy is highlighted as a significant aspect of the future relationship [11]. Section 4: Reasons for Current Messaging - The article outlines three reasons for the mainland's recent positive messaging towards Taiwan: the ongoing efforts for peaceful unification, the celebration of the 80th anniversary of Taiwan's recovery, and the implications for the upcoming 2028 Taiwan elections [12]. - The potential for the Democratic Progressive Party to maintain power for 16 years if they win the 2028 elections is noted as a critical concern [13]. Section 5: Legislative Context - The article references the mainland's Anti-Secession Law, which stipulates that the possibility of peaceful unification must not be completely lost, indicating the importance of the 2028 elections in this context [14][15].

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office emphasized that the mainstream public opinion in Taiwan advocates for peace, development, communication, and cooperation, while criticizing the current administration for ignoring public sentiment and worsening cross-strait relations [1][2]. Group 1: Cross-Strait Relations - The spokesperson stated that the "1992 Consensus" is the political foundation for cross-strait dialogue and stability, and its denial leads to tension and harm to the interests of Taiwanese people [2]. - The current administration's push for legislative amendments is seen as an attempt to create a "green terror" and escalate cross-strait tensions, which is contrary to the interests of the Taiwanese populace [1][2]. Group 2: Public Sentiment and Governance - Polls indicate that the approval rating for the current administration remains low, reflecting public dissatisfaction with its handling of cross-strait relations and economic policies [1]. - The spokesperson criticized the administration for prioritizing "Taiwan independence" over the welfare of Taiwanese citizens and businesses, which has led to increased public resentment [1]. Group 3: Religious and Social Issues - The spokesperson defended the policy of religious freedom and criticized the current administration for suppressing religious exchanges with the mainland, labeling it as a form of "green terror" [4]. - The establishment of a social media account by the Taiwan Affairs Office has received positive feedback from Taiwanese citizens, indicating a desire for better communication and connection with the mainland [3].

Core Points - The State Council's Taiwan Affairs Office emphasized the importance of promoting peaceful development of cross-strait relations and advancing national reunification as outlined in the recent Fourth Plenary Session of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China [1][2] - The meeting held from October 20 to 23 was significant for planning the next five years of economic and social development, which will have a profound impact on the country's progress towards socialist modernization [1] Group 1 - The Fourth Plenary Session clarified the strategic positioning of Taiwan work in the context of national strength and ethnic rejuvenation, providing strong motivation for future efforts [1][2] - The office reiterated the commitment to the "One China" principle and the "1992 Consensus," opposing Taiwan independence and external interference [2] - The emphasis was placed on enhancing economic and cultural exchanges between the two sides, encouraging Taiwanese participation in mainland development opportunities [2] Group 2 - The office expressed willingness to create a broad space for peaceful reunification while retaining the option to use necessary measures if required [2] - The concept of "peaceful reunification and one country, two systems" was highlighted as the best approach to resolving the Taiwan issue [2] - The call for unity among Taiwanese compatriots to oppose separatism and foreign interference was reiterated, aiming for shared prosperity and national rejuvenation [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights concerns regarding Taiwan's current political situation, emphasizing that Lai Ching-te's actions have made Taiwan a "global flashpoint" due to his provocative stance on independence [1] Group 1: Political Context - The article notes that increasing international concern and criticism have emerged regarding the Taiwan Strait situation, particularly directed at Lai Ching-te's pro-independence rhetoric [1] - It is stated that the root cause of the complex and severe situation in the Taiwan Strait is Lai Ching-te's refusal to acknowledge the "1992 Consensus," which embodies the one-China principle [1] - Lai Ching-te is labeled as a "peace destroyer" and a "crisis creator" in the Taiwan Strait, indicating a significant shift in regional stability [1] Group 2: Call for Unity - The spokesperson emphasizes that the Taiwan issue is purely an internal matter for China, asserting that the resolution should be handled by the Chinese people on both sides of the Strait [1] - There is a call for Taiwanese compatriots to recognize the extreme dangers and destructive nature of the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) persistent pro-independence stance [1] - The article advocates for a collective effort to return cross-strait relations to a path of peaceful development, aiming to maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait [1]

【免责声明】本文仅代表作者本人观点，与和讯网无关。和讯网站对文中陈述、观点判断保持中立，不对所包含内容 的准确性、可靠性或完整性提供任何明示或暗示的保证。请读者仅作参考，并请自行承担全部责任。邮箱： news_center@staff.hexun.com 格隆汇10月29日｜国台办今日上午举行例行新闻发布会。台陆委会主委邱垂正日前称，大陆要求台湾接 受"九二共识"，意味台湾是中国的一部分，基于所谓"台湾主权和民主"，民进党当局不会接受这种政治 前提。国台办发言人彭庆恩表示，坚持"九二共识"，两岸关系就能改善发展，台湾同胞就能受益；否 认"九二共识"，背离一个中国原则，两岸关系就会紧张动荡，台湾同胞利益就会受损。民进党当局长期 抹黑、造谣，污名化"九二共识"，严重破坏了两岸关系共同政治基础，损害了两岸同胞的共同利益。希 望广大台湾同胞正确理解"九二共识"的重要意义，坚决抵制"台独"分裂行径，与大陆同胞携手并肩推动 两岸关系和平发展、融合发展，共创民族复兴美好未来。 (责任编辑：宋政 HN002) ...

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a cross-strait common market will result in zero tariffs for Taiwanese goods entering mainland China, which is seen as a significant benefit for Taiwan [2] Summary by Sections Political Context - The commentary by Zhong Taiwen emphasizes the importance of the "1992 Consensus" and its implications for cross-strait relations, highlighting that both sides adhere to the principle of "one China" [6] - There is a call for dialogue among all Taiwanese political figures, encouraging them to recognize the shared identity of being Chinese and to work towards peaceful development of cross-strait relations [6][9] Economic Implications - The zero tariff policy is identified as the most substantial economic benefit for Taiwan, facilitating easier access to the vast mainland market [2][9] - The commentary suggests that after peaceful unification, Taiwan's current social system and lifestyle will be respected, ensuring the protection of private property, religious beliefs, and legal rights [9] Strategic Timing - The timing of these messages from the mainland is linked to three factors: the ongoing efforts for peaceful unification, the 80th anniversary of Taiwan's recovery, and the upcoming 2028 Taiwan elections [10] - The potential outcome of the 2028 elections, particularly if the pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party wins, poses a significant challenge for cross-strait relations [11][13]