Core Viewpoint - The article discusses how the United States, according to President Trump, is benefiting from the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict without directly spending funds on it, as military equipment costs are covered by NATO [2]. Group 1: U.S. Involvement in the Conflict - Trump stated that the U.S. has not directly spent money on the Russia-Ukraine conflict, with military equipment costs being paid by NATO [2]. - The first batch of military support, valued at $1 billion, has arrived in Ukraine, which includes missiles for the Patriot air defense system [5]. Group 2: Political Commentary - Trump expressed disappointment in Russian President Putin, indicating that he initially thought the Russia-Ukraine issue would be easy to resolve, but it has proven to be complex [6]. - He mentioned that if oil prices drop, Putin would have no choice but to end the war [6].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the escalating tensions between Russia and Ukraine, particularly focusing on recent military actions and their implications for regional security [1][2][3][7]. - Ukrainian President Zelensky reported that Russia launched approximately 580 drones and 40 missiles in a nighttime attack, resulting in 3 deaths and dozens of injuries across various regions including Dnipro and Kyiv [2][3]. - The Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant was targeted by Ukrainian forces, with drones attacking a training center, although no severe damage or casualties were reported [4][5]. Group 2 - The European Union officials condemned Russia's military aircraft entering Estonian airspace as "extremely dangerous" and "unacceptable," prompting NATO to scramble fighter jets for interception [7][8]. - The incident involving Russian aircraft occurred amidst ongoing tensions in the region, with previous reports of drones entering Polish airspace, attributed to Russia, which Russia denied [8]. - The EU plans to discuss collective responses to Russia's actions at an upcoming leaders' meeting in Copenhagen [7].

Group 1 - The EU is facing a production crisis due to a shortage of rare earth materials, with European companies halting production seven times in August and an expected increase to 46 times in September [1] - The EU's previous alignment with the US in sanctioning Chinese companies has backfired, as the US is now less stringent on China, leaving the EU in a vulnerable position [3][6] - The EU has committed to purchasing $750 billion worth of US energy over the next three years, which may harm its own economic interests while trying to comply with US demands [6] Group 2 - The US is strategically shifting its focus to the EU after facing setbacks with China and Russia, viewing the EU as an opportunity for economic gain [6][7] - There is a significant dependency of the US on EU imports for nearly 180 categories of strategic goods, indicating that the EU has potential leverage against the US [7] - The EU's ability to counteract US pressure hinges on internal consensus and reducing the influence of pro-US factions within its leadership [7]

Group 1 - The Russian Pacific Fleet successfully conducted a test launch of hypersonic cruise missiles from two nuclear submarines, hitting a target 155 miles (approximately 250 kilometers) away in the Sea of Okhotsk, showcasing Russia's military capabilities in a region of mutual concern with the U.S. [1][3] - The submarines "Krasnoyarsk" and "Omsk" launched "Onyx" and "Granite" cruise missiles at a simulated target, part of a military exercise aimed at protecting maritime communications along the North Pacific, Kamchatka Peninsula, and Chukotka Peninsula [3] - Tensions in Eastern Europe have escalated, with NATO countries reporting incursions of Russian drones into their airspace, leading to diplomatic protests from Romania and military deployments in Poland as part of NATO's eastern presence [3][4] Group 2 - Russia's response to provocations is characterized as strong, with the Kremlin asserting that NATO's involvement in the Ukraine conflict is direct and significant, complicating the prospects for serious negotiations to resolve the conflict [4]

佩斯科夫说，欧盟仍在继续以敌对行为来针对俄罗斯，认为制裁措施能影响俄罗斯的政策的想法是错误 的。从之前所推出的针对俄罗斯的18轮制裁措施后果来看，俄罗斯并没有被打倒。 当地时间9月17日，俄罗斯总统新闻秘书佩斯科夫在接受媒体采访时表示，俄罗斯与乌克兰之间交换被 俘人员的工作目前处于暂停状态，但应该是会继续的。在乌克兰问题的谈判上俄罗斯始终对和平解决持 开放态度。 在回答有关俄美领导人会谈的问题时佩斯科夫说，目前有关俄美领导人会谈的日期还没有消息，但两国 的接触一直在进行，包括两国总统府间的沟通。 （文章来源：央视新闻） ...

Core Viewpoint - Hungary's EU Affairs Minister, Janos Borkai, emphasized that the EU should focus on enhancing competitiveness rather than adopting a wartime economy, stating that high energy prices must be addressed for this goal to be achieved [1] Group 1: Energy Prices and Economic Policy - Borkai criticized the EU's sanctions and trade policies, arguing that high energy prices are not solely due to purchasing Russian oil and gas, but rather stem from flaws in the EU's sanctions, trade, industrial policies, and the green transition [1] - He asserted that without improvements in these areas, energy prices will not decrease [1] Group 2: EU's Involvement in Ukraine - Borkai expressed skepticism regarding the EU's increased involvement in the Russia-Ukraine conflict as suggested by EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, highlighting the need for the EU to address internal issues such as competitiveness, high energy prices, and housing difficulties [1] - He stated that Ukraine cannot bypass legal and political processes to join the EU, as this would contradict EU treaties, despite member states being able to discuss matters with non-EU countries [1]

俄乌冲突，又有新消息传来！ 俄罗斯总统新闻秘书佩斯科夫当地时间15日表示，北约事实上正在与俄罗斯交战。佩斯科夫称，北约实 际上已经参与了俄乌冲突，向乌方提供间接和直接的援助。 同一天，俄罗斯联邦安全会议副主席梅德韦杰夫对欧洲发出警告，称任何试图没收俄资产的欧洲国家都 将遭到追究。此前有消息称，欧盟正寻求新途径，利用数千亿美元被冻结的俄罗斯资产援助乌克兰。 同日，俄罗斯国防部发布战报称，俄军控制了扎波罗热地区的奥利戈夫斯科耶居民点。同一天，乌克兰 武装部队总参谋部通报称，乌军在利曼、托雷茨克、波克罗夫斯克等方向击退俄军多次进攻。 佩斯科夫：北约正在与俄交战 据央视新闻消息，当地时间9月15日，俄罗斯总统新闻秘书佩斯科夫表示，北约在与俄罗斯作战，这不 需要任何补充性的证明。北约实际上已经参与了俄乌冲突，向乌方提供间接和直接的援助。因此，完全 可以说北约在同俄罗斯作战。 佩斯科夫还表示，俄罗斯依然有意愿通过政治和外交手段调解乌克兰危机，对对话保持开放立场与意 愿。但乌方人为地延阻这一进程，任何人都不想涉及冲突的本质。同时，欧洲国家也在施加干扰，没有 关注危机根本原因的打算。 此外，佩斯科夫还表示，有关俄美乌举行峰会 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses recent military actions between Ukraine and Russia, highlighting Ukraine's attack on a key Russian oil facility and ongoing battles in various regions, as well as the geopolitical implications involving NATO and diplomatic efforts. Group 1: Military Actions - Ukrainian armed forces conducted a coordinated attack on the Russian oil refinery in Saratov, which is crucial for supplying fuel to the Russian military [1][3] - The Russian Defense Ministry reported control over the Oligovskoye settlement in the Zaporizhzhia region, while Ukraine claimed to have repelled multiple Russian attacks in various directions [5][7][9] Group 2: Geopolitical Context - Russian presidential spokesperson Peskov stated that NATO is effectively engaged in combat with Russia by providing support to Ukraine, indicating a significant escalation in the conflict [10][12] - Peskov also mentioned that there has been no progress in the trilateral talks involving Russia, the U.S., and Ukraine, emphasizing Russia's willingness for diplomatic resolution despite perceived obstacles from Ukraine and European nations [12][13]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights escalating tensions between Russia and NATO, particularly regarding the use of drones in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, with warnings from Russian officials about potential war if NATO countries engage militarily against Russian drones [2][4]. Group 1: Russian Warnings - Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council, issued a stern warning that NATO's actions against Russian drones over Ukraine could lead to a state of war between Russia and NATO [2]. - Medvedev criticized the idea of establishing a "no-fly zone" over Ukraine, labeling it a provocative notion that would escalate the conflict [2][3]. - The Russian government denied accusations of intentionally sending drones into Polish and Romanian airspace, claiming they were "decoy" drones amid a broader drone campaign targeting Ukraine [2]. Group 2: NATO's Involvement - The Romanian military reported tracking two Russian drones that entered its airspace, prompting F-16 fighter jets to scramble, although no engagement occurred [2]. - Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov stated that NATO is effectively at war with Russia, asserting that NATO's support for Ukraine constitutes direct involvement in the conflict [4]. - Medvedev also commented on the aggressive behavior of smaller nations' leaders, specifically targeting the Estonian Defense Minister's visit to Ukraine [3]. Group 3: Cross-Border Attacks - Ukraine continues to conduct cross-border drone attacks against Russian territory, resulting in civilian casualties, including the deaths of two women in Belgorod region [3]. - Additional reports indicated injuries and property damage from these attacks, highlighting the ongoing violence in the region [4].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Treasury Secretary emphasizes the need for European countries to take greater action in cutting off Russian oil revenues and ending the Russia-Ukraine conflict, suggesting that without European cooperation, U.S. actions will not progress [1][4]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and Statements - The U.S. plans to impose high tariffs on countries like China and India that purchase Russian oil, with the aim of pressuring these nations to stop their purchases [1][5]. - The U.S. Treasury Secretary claims that if Europe imposes high "secondary tariffs" on Russian oil buyers, the war could end within 60 to 90 days due to the loss of revenue for Russia [4][5]. - The U.S. is willing to collaborate with European nations to consider stricter sanctions against Russian oil companies, including Rosneft and Lukoil [4][5]. Group 2: Reactions from China - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce opposes the U.S. using "Russia-related" reasons to impose trade restrictions on China, labeling it as unilateral bullying and economic coercion [1][6]. - China emphasizes the importance of dialogue and negotiation to resolve trade differences and maintain global trade order and supply chain stability [2][6]. - Chinese officials assert that claims of China providing military support to Russia are false and highlight China's efforts in promoting peace talks regarding the Ukraine crisis [8][9]. Group 3: International Relations and Implications - The U.S. is reportedly pressuring the G7 countries to impose significant tariffs on China and India for purchasing Russian oil, aiming to leverage these tariffs to encourage peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine [5][6]. - The U.S. and India are engaged in ongoing trade negotiations, with both countries expressing a desire to strengthen their partnership amidst these geopolitical tensions [4][5].