Core Viewpoint - The recent public notification by the Xinjiang Kizilsu Prefecture highlights the ongoing efforts to reduce formalism and alleviate burdens on grassroots levels, revealing several typical issues that have been addressed through corrective measures [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Issues Identified - A town official in Atushi City was found to have imposed unrealistic social media growth targets on local village leaders, resulting in increased pressure and negative impacts on grassroots governance [1]. - The Kizilsu government service hall was criticized for occupying staff's rest time with mandatory political theory studies and complicated leave processes, which added to the workload of the personnel [2]. - A deputy mayor in Yuma Town was reprimanded for neglecting regulatory duties, leading to multiple unauthorized burials and ineffective rectification efforts, with a total of 61 violations reported [2]. - A deputy township head in Tuoyun Township displayed a lack of service awareness and a harsh attitude towards citizens, resulting in administrative penalties and damage to community relations [3]. - An official in Machang County was found to have illegally collected compensation payments from 136 residents, significantly harming their interests and increasing their burdens [4]. Group 2: Recommendations and Responses - The notification emphasizes the need for local units to take responsibility for reducing formalism and to actively implement reduction measures, highlighting a lack of deep understanding and proactive engagement with these requirements [4]. - It calls for leaders to reflect on their roles and responsibilities, conduct thorough self-examinations, and ensure that the reduction of formalism is genuinely pursued with diligence [4]. - The state-level mechanism will continue to monitor and evaluate the rectification of these issues, with strict consequences for those who fail to comply or repeat offenses [4].

Group 1 - The meeting emphasized the importance of incorporating public opinions and suggestions into the "14th Five-Year Plan" preparation, ensuring scientific, democratic, and practical planning [2][3] - The meeting highlighted the need to address formalism and reduce burdens on grassroots levels, focusing on problem rectification and strengthening coordination and responsibility [2][3] - The meeting recognized the significance of wildlife protection, particularly for birds, and called for strict measures against illegal hunting and trading, promoting a societal atmosphere for wildlife conservation [2][3] Group 2 - The meeting stressed the necessity of high-quality development as a primary task, aiming for the "six major goals" and implementing strategies for innovation, industry strength, and cultural prosperity [3] - The meeting called for systematic thinking and targeted actions in ecological environment protection, emphasizing comprehensive and thorough rectification efforts [3] - The meeting discussed other matters related to the overall development and planning of the city [4]

为基层减负，关乎民生福祉、干部作风，关乎抓落实的成效和水平。 以习近平同志为核心的党中央始终高度重视整治形式主义为基层减负。2024年8月，中办、国办印发 《整治形式主义为基层减负若干规定》（以下简称《若干规定》）。这是首次以党内法规形式制定出台 为基层减负的制度规范。 一年来，各地区各部门狠抓《若干规定》落地落实，为基层减负长效机制日益健全。减负清风劲吹，实 干活力奔涌，广大基层干部群众的获得感、幸福感持续提升。 为长远计、为根本谋，向作风之弊亮剑 河南人口总量、人口密度、人口流动量都比较大，社会问题复杂多样，如何实现高效能治理？ 今年5月，习近平总书记来到河南考察。看一域，谋全局，心系治理体系和治理能力现代化这篇大文 章。总书记精准把脉，开出治理良方，明确指出："要切实整治形式主义为基层减负，不能好事、栽花 的事揽着做，难事、得罪人的事推给基层做"。 这是深刻的警示，更是行动的号令。 基层强则国家强，基层安则天下安。基层，是国家治理的"神经末梢"，是服务群众的最前沿，是贯彻落 实党中央决策部署的"最后一公里"。 新形势下，越是任务艰巨，越是挑战严峻，就越需要以过硬的作风保驾护航，越需要以钉钉子精神持续 整 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of reducing burdens on grassroots levels to enhance public welfare and improve the effectiveness of governance [1][3] - The Central Committee has issued regulations aimed at addressing formalism and reducing burdens on grassroots, marking a significant step in institutional reform [1][4] - The implementation of these regulations has led to a noticeable increase in the sense of gain and happiness among grassroots officials and the public [1][3] Group 2 - The governance challenges in populous regions like Henan highlight the need for effective management and the elimination of formalism that burdens grassroots [2][3] - The emphasis on grassroots strength is crucial for national stability and effective governance, with a call for a shift in focus from formalism to practical service [3][4] - The ongoing efforts to combat formalism are seen as essential for ensuring that central policies are effectively implemented at the grassroots level [3][4] Group 3 - The introduction of specific measures in the regulations aims to tackle both old and new forms of formalism, indicating a commitment to deep-rooted reform [3][9] - The focus on simplifying assessments and reducing bureaucratic processes has led to a significant decrease in the volume of documents and meetings, enhancing operational efficiency [10][11] - The establishment of clear responsibilities and streamlined processes has empowered grassroots officials to focus more on serving the public [12][13] Group 4 - The implementation of digital solutions in governance has streamlined processes, significantly reducing the time required for administrative tasks [14][15] - The creation of specialized service teams has improved direct engagement with enterprises, enhancing service delivery and operational efficiency [16][17] - The overall governance effectiveness has improved, with grassroots officials actively engaging with communities to address local issues [17][18]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the issuance of the "Regulations on Reducing Burdens on Grassroots by Rectifying Formalism," which aims to address significant issues faced by grassroots officials, including excessive documentation and meetings, and the proliferation of redundant government apps [1] Group 1: Government App Integration - The "Regulations" propose a "slimming action" for government apps, limiting each department to operate a maximum of one app for grassroots use, and requiring the consolidation of existing redundant apps [3][4] - Pilot programs in regions like Hainan and Chongqing have reportedly reduced data reporting burdens by over 60% [4] - The regulations emphasize the need for unified data reporting through provincial platforms to eliminate "data islands" and reduce repetitive data entry [3][6] Group 2: Meeting and Document Management - The "Regulations" aim to control the number and improve the quality of documents and meetings, implementing annual limits on document issuance and restricting the length of specialized documents to no more than 4,000 words [7][8] - It promotes a principle of merging and reducing meetings, with comprehensive meetings limited to once a year and strict attendance criteria to avoid unnecessary participation [8] - The regulations advocate for a more efficient meeting culture, with specific time limits for presentations and discussions [8] Group 3: Inspection and Assessment Reforms - The "Regulations" address the issue of excessive inspections and assessments by limiting the number of inspections conducted by central and national agencies to no more than one per year for localities [10] - It prohibits the use of non-essential criteria such as meeting attendance and media coverage as assessment standards, aiming to streamline evaluation processes [10] - The regulations also restrict the borrowing of personnel from lower-level units and mandate strict approval for any delegation of responsibilities [10]

Core Points - The central government emphasizes the importance of reducing burdens on grassroots officials and maintaining long-term efforts in this area [1][2] - The "Several Regulations" introduced 21 specific measures aimed at reducing formalism and clarifying responsibilities at the grassroots level [2][4] - The issue of formalism is prevalent at the grassroots level, but its roots are not solely found there [3][8] Summary by Sections - **Regulatory Measures**: The regulations focus on streamlining documents, reducing meetings, and clarifying responsibilities to alleviate the burden on grassroots officials [2][4] - **Responsibility Clarity**: There is a need to establish clear responsibility lists to prevent grassroots officials from being overwhelmed by tasks outside their primary duties [4][5] - **Enforcement and Accountability**: The regulations stress the importance of accountability for violations, with a mechanism for reporting and addressing issues at various levels [7][8] - **Cultural Challenges**: The persistence of formalism is attributed to the performance consciousness of higher authorities and the compliance mentality of grassroots officials [8]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of addressing formalism and bureaucratism to enhance efficiency and reduce burdens on grassroots levels, highlighting the implementation of regulations aimed at alleviating these issues over the past year [1][12]. Group 1: Implementation and Impact - The issuance of the regulations in August 2024 has provided a crucial framework for addressing formalism and reducing burdens on grassroots, contributing to a more effective governance system [1]. - Various regions have actively engaged in evaluating and rectifying issues related to excessive documentation and meetings, leading to a more streamlined approach in governance [3][11]. - The introduction of a "one report" system in Tianjin has significantly reduced the workload for grassroots officials by consolidating data reporting processes [4]. Group 2: Specific Measures and Innovations - In Guangxi, a checklist for evaluating the consistency of documents with the goal of reducing burdens has been implemented, ensuring that new documents are practical and relevant [2]. - Jiangsu has introduced a "comprehensive inspection" reform to minimize redundant inspections by various regulatory bodies, thereby alleviating the burden on enterprises [3]. - Xinjiang has established a clear responsibilities checklist for local governments, which has improved efficiency and reduced confusion regarding duties [7]. Group 3: Long-term Commitment and Results - The ongoing efforts to combat formalism and bureaucratism are recognized as a long-term commitment, with continuous monitoring and adjustments to address emerging challenges [6][12]. - A survey indicated that over 95% of grassroots officials believe the measures to reduce formalism have been effective, reflecting a strong desire for sustained efforts in this area [11]. - The article underscores that reducing burdens does not equate to diminishing responsibilities, emphasizing the need for accountability alongside efficiency [8].

4.严控会议数量。召开会议严格实行计划管理。法定性、制度性会议按照有关规定执行。本系统本 领域综合性工作会议，原则上每年不超过1次，各级部门召开的业务工作会议能合并的合并、能精简的 精简。各级召开日常性会议应当精简务实、控制频次，可以合并研究审议的事项应当合并。对上级精神 不刻意搞开会传达不过夜。未经同级党委主要负责同志批准，不得随意召开直达基层的会议（含电视电 话、网络视频会议），对已直接开到基层的，不再层层召开。压减现场观摩会、推进会等频次数量。已 制发文件的工作事项原则上不再专门开会部署。市县两级党委和政府对年度综合性会议加大统筹力度， 防止年底年初扎堆开会，明显减少乡镇（街道）党政主要负责同志和村（社区）党组织书记、村（居） 委会主任参加的会议数量。 5.控制规模规格。严控参会人员范围、层级，只安排与会议主题密切相关的单位参加，不搞层层陪 会。合理确定会议规格，由分管负责同志召集部署的会议，一般不要求下级主要负责同志参会。以部门 名义召开的会议，未经同级党委批准，不得要求下级党委和政府负责同志参会。不简单以出席会议领导 级别对参会人员提出相应级别要求，可由分管负责同志参加的会议不要求主要负责同志参会， ...

Core Points - The article discusses the issuance of the "Several Regulations on Reducing Burdens for Grassroots by Rectifying Formalism" by the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council, emphasizing the need to combat formalism and bureaucratism [1] - It highlights that formalism and bureaucratism are significant issues that hinder the effective implementation of policies at the grassroots level, which is crucial for executing the decisions of the Central Committee [1] - The regulations aim to establish a long-term mechanism for reducing burdens on grassroots, aligning with the spirit of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China [1] Summary by Sections - **Regulatory Framework** - The "Several Regulations" are designed to alleviate the burdens caused by formalism and bureaucratism on grassroots organizations [1] - The regulations call for strict adherence by all regions and departments to ensure effective implementation [1] - **Implementation and Oversight** - The notification mandates that various levels of government and party organizations must take practical steps to reduce burdens and empower grassroots entities [1] - It emphasizes the importance of regular supervision and checks by central authorities to ensure compliance with the regulations [1] - Responsibilities are assigned to party committees and disciplinary inspection agencies to ensure the regulations are effectively enforced [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the issuance of the "Several Regulations on Reducing Burdens for Grassroots by Rectifying Formalism," which aims to address prominent issues in grassroots governance, including excessive documentation and meetings, and proposes specific measures to alleviate these burdens [1] Group 1: Streamlining Government Apps - The "Several Regulations" emphasize the need to reduce the number of government apps, allowing only one app per department for grassroots use, to eliminate redundancy and improve efficiency [3][5] - A "slimming action" for government apps is being implemented to avoid fragmentation, with a focus on integrating data reporting through provincial platforms to reduce repetitive data entry [3][4] - Pilot programs in regions like Hainan and Chongqing have reportedly reduced data reporting burdens by over 60% [4] Group 2: Reducing Documentation and Meetings - The regulations aim to control the volume of documents and meetings, implementing a total annual limit on document issuance and restricting the length of specialized documents to no more than 4,000 words [6] - Meetings are to be minimized, with comprehensive meetings limited to once a year and strict attendance rules to prevent unnecessary participation [6] - The regulations promote a more efficient meeting culture, encouraging concise presentations and discussions to save time [6] Group 3: Overhauling Supervision and Assessment - The regulations address the issue of excessive supervision and assessments, limiting the number of inspections and requiring prior approval for new initiatives [8] - Assessment criteria are being revised to eliminate non-essential metrics, such as attendance and documentation, to focus on substantive performance [8] - The regulations also prohibit the borrowing of personnel from lower-level units without strict approval, aiming to clarify responsibilities and reduce resource wastage [8]