Group 1 - The core issue is the rising incidence of telecom network fraud targeting students during the summer, with five main types identified [1] - The five types of fraud include: 1. Part-time brushing tasks, where scammers lure students with fake job offers and later induce them to invest more [1] 2. Flight ticket refund and change scams, where fraudsters impersonate airline customer service to offer refunds [1] 3. Fake concert ticket sales, where scammers request deposits under the guise of service fees [1] 4. Online game account and equipment scams, where victims are directed to fraudulent trading platforms [1] 5. Education institution refund scams, where scammers send fake refund documents to trick victims into transferring money [1] Group 2 - The police highlight a significant increase in scams targeting minors, particularly those impersonating law enforcement [2] - Scammers use social media and gaming platforms to lure minors with offers like "star chasing benefits" and then impersonate police or lawyers [2] - Effective prevention measures include avoiding unknown links, not trusting unfamiliar calls, and verifying any money transfers [2] - In case of falling victim to fraud, immediate actions include reporting to the police, collecting evidence, and visiting the nearest police station to file a report [2]

今年上半年，省通信管理局反诈平台能力大幅提升，涉诈电话发现能力增长2.8倍，涉诈App发现能 力增长52%，向公安机关推送预警线索219万条，协助打掉各类诈骗窝点400余个。同时，全力整治"利 用虚拟号码诈骗扰民问题"，清理违规号码千余个。上半年，山东涉案电话卡数量同比下降34.7%。 今年以来，中国人民银行山东省分行组织全省商业银行依法处置涉诈账户1.7万户，排查涉诈关联 账户6.4万户，对中高风险客户开展强化尽职调查31.5万人次，协助公安机关冻结资金9.19亿元，切实保 护人民群众财产安全。 省政府新闻办8月5日下午举行新闻发布会，介绍山东纵深推进反诈三年行动，以务实举措筑牢民生 防线情况。今年以来，全省各级各有关部门纵深推进打击治理电信网络诈骗三年行动，全省发案数、损 失数环比保持下降态势，打击治理工作取得明显成效。 省公安厅副厅长、一级巡视员，省打击治理电信网络新型违法犯罪工作厅际联席会议召集人戚思宇 介绍，全省各级各有关部门在组织推动方面，突出政府领导、行业主责、部门参与，全力构建全社会抓 反诈工作格局。在防范反制方面，全力拦截诈骗电话和短信，持续提升电讯大数据智能分析效能，搭建 14类和128个 ...

兼职刷单类。诈骗分子发布虚假兼职信息，吸引学生参加刷单等任务。"诈骗分子先发放小额佣金，骗 取信任后，会进一步诱导下载涉诈应用程序，通过做'大任务'赚大额佣金，让受害人不断加大投 入。"李奎说。 机票退改签类。诈骗分子冒充航空公司客服，以飞机故障、航班延误为由，主动提供退款、理赔或改签 服务，诱导受害人点击链接，进而实施诈骗。 购买演出门票类。诈骗分子在社交平台或二手交易平台发布虚假门票信息，以"中介费""保证金"为由要 求转账汇款实施诈骗。 买卖网络游戏账号和装备类。诈骗分子在游戏论坛、交易平台上寻找目标买家或卖家，引导其进入虚假 交易平台或钓鱼网站，最后以资金冻结或操作失效等为由，诱导受害人向指定账户转账实施诈骗。 暑期，学生群体遭受电信网络诈骗案件呈高发态势。电信网络诈骗有哪些形式？如何有效防范？遭遇诈 骗后如何应对？ 湖北省反诈中心民警李奎介绍，学生群体暑期遭遇的电信网络诈骗主要有5类： 教育机构退费类。诈骗分子伪造机构退费的官方文件，以快递信函、群发短信或社交平台私信等形式发 送给受害人，诱导受害人添加虚假客服人员，引导其在虚假平台操作退费或向指定账户充值转账。 浙江省杭州市公安局刑侦支队六大队二中 ...

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and the Ministry of Public Security issued opinions on handling criminal cases related to aiding information network crimes, providing clearer standards for conviction and sentencing [1][2] - The opinions consist of five parts and sixteen articles, addressing the overall requirements for handling aiding crimes, accurately identifying aiding crimes, and maintaining comprehensive governance [1][3] - The opinions clarify the subjective knowledge standards for aiding crimes, the criteria for serious circumstances related to "two-card" crimes, and the differentiation between aiding crimes and related offenses such as concealment and fraud [1][2] Group 2 - The opinions adjust the standards for recognizing serious circumstances in "two-card" crimes, specifying that selling or renting three bank accounts or payment accounts meets the serious criteria, and any sale or rental of over 20 phone cards is also considered serious [2] - The opinions emphasize a balanced approach to criminal policy, advocating for strict penalties for organized and professional aiding crimes while allowing leniency for minors and those at the end of the criminal chain [2][3] - Specific rules and measures for implementing judicial recommendations, enforcing occupational bans, and conducting legal education are detailed in the opinions [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and the Ministry of Public Security have issued opinions on handling criminal cases related to aiding information network crimes, emphasizing the importance of both punishment and prevention in combating telecom and internet fraud [1][2]. Group 1 - The opinions clarify the criteria for determining whether an individual is "aware that others are using the information network to commit crimes" and whether they are "providing assistance for others to commit crimes" [2]. - The opinions specify that the threshold for "serious circumstances" in aiding crimes involving "two cards" must be assessed based on the amount of criminal funds involved, rather than solely on the individual's actions [2]. - The standard for "serious circumstances" has been adjusted to include the sale or rental of three bank accounts or payment accounts, rather than just one, to tighten the legal framework [2]. Group 2 - The Supreme People's Court will collaborate with public security and procuratorial agencies to implement the opinions effectively, enhancing inter-departmental cooperation [3]. - The court will issue judicial recommendations when systemic risks are identified in financial, telecommunications, and internet sectors, aiming to prevent issues before they escalate [3]. - The approach will shift from reactive measures to a balanced strategy of prevention, control, and punishment to comprehensively address aiding crimes [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing prevalence of telecommunications fraud and the legal measures being implemented to combat it, including a recent case involving a telecommunications operator who facilitated fraud by issuing multiple phone cards [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Cases - A telecommunications operator was sentenced to 8 months in prison and banned from related work for 5 years after issuing 24 phone cards used in fraud, resulting in over 94,000 yuan in losses to victims [1]. - The Supreme People's Court, Supreme People's Procuratorate, and Ministry of Public Security jointly released guidelines to clarify the legal standards for prosecuting those who assist in information network crimes [2][3]. Group 2: Crime Trends and Challenges - The rise of telecommunications fraud has led to the emergence of a black and gray industry, with associated crimes posing significant threats to network security and social stability [2]. - The characteristics of those involved in assisting such crimes have shifted, with a notable increase in younger, less educated individuals, including minors and students, becoming involved [2][3]. Group 3: New Guidelines and Policies - The newly issued guidelines consist of 5 parts and 16 articles, addressing the overall requirements for handling crimes related to assistance in information network crimes and clarifying the standards for recognizing such crimes [3][4]. - The guidelines establish clear criteria for determining the severity of crimes involving phone and bank cards, with specific thresholds for actions such as selling or renting multiple accounts [4][5]. Group 4: Collaborative Efforts - The guidelines emphasize the need for collaboration among various sectors, including finance, telecommunications, and education, to effectively combat information network crimes [5].

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and the Ministry of Public Security have issued guidelines to combat information network crimes, particularly focusing on organized, professional, and cross-border assistance in such crimes, emphasizing strict penalties for key offenders [1][2]. Group 1: Trends in Cybercrime - Since 2020, the number of cases related to assistance in information network crimes has been increasing, with over 100,000 cases reported in 2023, despite a significant decrease in the first half of 2024 compared to previous years [1]. - The rise in cases involving "two cards" (bank cards used for illicit activities) has also been noted, indicating a persistent high level of related criminal activity [1]. Group 2: Characteristics of Offenders - Current offenders in assistance crimes exhibit a "three lows and one high" profile: low age, low education, low income, and a high proportion of first-time offenders, with over 80% of defendants under 35 years old and one-third under 25 [2]. - There is a notable issue with minors and students being involved in these crimes, raising significant social concerns [2]. Group 3: Legal Framework and Enforcement - The guidelines clarify the criteria for determining whether an individual knowingly assisted in a crime, emphasizing the need to assess the severity of the crime and the involvement of the accused [3]. - The guidelines advocate for a balanced approach in enforcement, suggesting leniency for minors and those at the lower end of the criminal chain while ensuring strict penalties for serious offenders [3]. - Collaboration among various governmental departments is encouraged to enhance the comprehensive governance of information network crimes, focusing on both prevention and punishment [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government is intensifying efforts to combat telecommunications and internet fraud by tightening legal frameworks and increasing criminal prosecution, aiming to dismantle the operational foundations of such crimes [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Criminal Prosecution - The Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and the Ministry of Public Security jointly issued new opinions to strengthen the criminal legal framework against aiding information network crimes [1]. - Since 2020, the number of first-instance cases related to aiding crimes has been increasing, with over 100,000 cases concluded in 2023 [1]. - The new opinions consist of 16 articles that clarify the legal definitions and standards for recognizing aiding crimes, particularly concerning the misuse of phone and bank cards [1]. Group 2: Criminal Activity and Law Enforcement Actions - The characteristics of aiding crimes have become more professional and cross-border, necessitating a robust crackdown [1]. - The Ministry of Public Security reported that 780,000 "card-cutting" leads were issued this year, resulting in the investigation of 230,000 suspects and the dismantling of over 5,500 illegal card issuance groups [2]. - A total of 170,000 illegal phone and bank cards were confiscated, and 23 insiders from banks and telecom operators were arrested [2].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the increasing trend of low-age, low-education, and low-income individuals involved in telecom fraud, with over 80% of defendants being under 35 years old and one-third being under 25 years old [1] Group 2 - The Supreme People's Court emphasizes the exploitation of minors and students by criminal gangs, who take advantage of their inexperience and lack of self-protection skills to engage them in illegal activities such as renting out phone cards and participating in money laundering [2] - The newly issued guidelines propose lenient treatment for minors and students involved in such crimes, advocating for education and rehabilitation rather than punishment, particularly for those with minor offenses [2] - The guidelines also stress the importance of legal education and collaboration with educational institutions to manage and educate minors and students effectively [2] Group 3 - It is crucial to note that leniency for minors and students does not equate to a lack of accountability, and there will be a focus on thoroughly investigating and punishing those who exploit these vulnerable groups for criminal activities [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a new scam targeting elderly individuals, where fraudsters use counterfeit bank cards claiming to be for government subsidies, leading to significant financial loss and personal information theft [1][4]. Group 1: Case Review - A 70-year-old man was deceived into believing he had a balance of over 400 million yuan on a counterfeit bank card labeled "XX Bank" and "Precision Poverty Alleviation" [1][4]. - The card was sent by an unknown company, which claimed it was a "special card for pension subsidies" and required the elderly man to pay over 1,000 yuan for "activation fees" and "insurance" [4][8]. - The fraudsters used a fake app to show the victim a fictitious balance and enticing gifts, which led him to visit the bank to withdraw money [4][7]. Group 2: Characteristics of the Scam - The scam involves creating fake bank cards with government project logos, disguised as "subsidy cards" or "welfare cards" [5]. - Fraudsters request fees under the guise of "activating the card" or "service charges" [6]. - A fraudulent app is used alongside the fake card to fabricate account balances and gifts, enhancing the scam's credibility [7]. - Personal information is extracted from victims to facilitate further scams [8]. Group 3: Police Warnings - Legitimate bank cards must be obtained in person at a bank; any card received by mail is likely a scam [10]. - Any card that requires payment before use is a clear indication of fraud [11]. - Individuals are advised to verify suspicious cards with their bank or report to authorities immediately [12].