Core Viewpoint - Recent provocative statements by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan represent a serious interference in China's internal affairs and pose a significant threat to stability in Northeast Asia and international security [1][2]. Group 1: Provocative Statements - Takaichi's remarks on Taiwan are seen as highly provocative and detrimental to Sino-Japanese relations, with no benefits for Japan [1]. - The reference to the "San Francisco Peace Treaty," which is deemed illegal and invalid, is criticized as inappropriate and misleading regarding Taiwan's status [1]. Group 2: Military Developments - Japan's Defense Minister, Nobuo Kishi, announced plans to deploy missiles on Yonaguni Island, approximately 110 kilometers east of Taiwan, which is viewed as a destabilizing action [2]. - Takaichi's discussions about potentially allowing nuclear weapons on Japanese soil directly contradict Japan's long-standing "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [2]. Group 3: Historical Context and Risks - Experts warn that Japan's recent military rhetoric reflects a dangerous trend of seeking to expand the Self-Defense Forces' capabilities and potentially engage in overseas operations [2]. - The revival of nationalist sentiments and the glorification of the "Bushido spirit" by Japanese leaders could lead the country into perilous situations reminiscent of its aggressive policies during World War II [2].

Group 1 - A gathering of political, academic, and civic leaders in Japan demanded Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo retract his erroneous statements regarding Taiwan to prevent further damage to Japan-China relations [1][3] - Former Ministry of Foreign Affairs official Sunzaki Takashi emphasized that the Taiwan issue is purely an internal matter for China and criticized Kishi's linkage of Taiwan to Japan's "survival crisis" as absurd [1][3] - Lawmaker Hiraoka Hideo stated that Kishi's statements, made to please his support base, are unacceptable and could lead to significant economic losses for Japan [3][4] Group 2 - Senator Ibo Yoichi expressed concerns over Japan's increasing military presence in the southwestern islands and the rising defense budget, which he believes could escalate regional tensions [3][4] - Senator Takara Saya suggested that Kishi's provocative remarks are intended to create an atmosphere for further military expansion and revision of Japan's security policies [3][4] - Professor Haba Kumiko highlighted Japan's historical colonial rule over Taiwan, urging the government to exercise caution in its statements regarding the Taiwan issue [4]

针对日本首相高市早苗近期发表的涉台错误言论，日本各地抗议集会活动接连不断。当地时间11月28日晚，一批日本民众在东京的世田谷区举行集会，要求 坚持和平宪法，呼吁高市早苗撤回错误言论。 在集会现场，有抗议者打出写有"维护和平宪法""反对扩张军备""高市早苗立即辞职"等内容的横幅，一些集会参与者还在现场发表演说，批评近期日本政府 增加防卫费支出、试图考虑修改"无核三原则"的企图。 集会参加者：关于集体自卫权的问题，此前我们一直都是反对的，而且作为唯一的核爆受害国，日本在核问题上必须慎重，坚持无核三原则，我认为这是极 其重要的。投入军力上的预算和财政支出，最终会破坏我们的生活。政府却还要不断增加军费，我觉得这是非常危险的方向。 集会参加者：日本曾是发动侵略战争的国家，战后，日本民众曾发誓，绝不能再发动战争。然而不知不觉间，日本却走向了要海外参战的状态，我们绝不能 让这种情况继续下去，我们要弘扬和平宪法的精神。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes China's strong opposition to Japan's potential abandonment of its "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and the implications of Japan's military security movements, which raise concerns about a shift towards militarism [1][2] - Japan's vague stance on its "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and the possibility of nuclear sharing arrangements are highlighted as significant negative policy shifts that could threaten international order [1] - The need for strict oversight of Japan's nuclear capabilities is stressed, given its unique position as a non-nuclear weapon state with advanced plutonium processing capabilities [1] Group 2 - The Fukushima nuclear accident is characterized as both a natural disaster and a man-made catastrophe, with ongoing concerns regarding the handling of nuclear wastewater [2] - China's firm opposition to Japan's decision to discharge nuclear-contaminated water into the ocean is reiterated, alongside calls for international monitoring by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [2] - The challenges and risks associated with the decommissioning of the Fukushima facility and radioactive waste management are underscored, necessitating continued international scrutiny [2]

Core Viewpoint - Japanese citizens held protests demanding Prime Minister Kishi's retraction of controversial remarks regarding Taiwan, which are seen as a violation of Japan's pacifist constitution and a challenge to international norms [1][2] Group 1: Public Response - Thousands of Japanese citizens gathered in front of the Prime Minister's residence in Tokyo, calling for the retraction of Kishi's statements, which they believe undermine regional stability and violate Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution [1] - Protesters expressed concerns over the government's recent military spending increases and attempts to amend security regulations, emphasizing the importance of maintaining Japan's pacifist stance [1][2] Group 2: Academic and International Perspectives - Japanese economist Hironobu Maedomari criticized Kishi's remarks as contrary to Japan's peace constitution, warning that constitutional amendments could lead Japan towards a dangerous path [2] - Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov expressed concern over Kishi's statements, supporting China's stance on national interests and urging responsible behavior from U.S. allies regarding Taiwan [2] - Jeffrey Sachs, a professor at Columbia University, noted that Kishi's comments have heightened tensions between China and Japan, advocating for a cautious and peace-oriented approach in Japan's foreign policy [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Japan's recent arms export activities and potential changes to its defense policies, highlighting concerns from China regarding Japan's military expansion and historical context related to World War II [1] Group 1: Japan's Arms Export and Defense Policy Changes - Japan has completed the export of "Patriot" air defense missiles to the United States, marking its first export of lethal weapons since relaxing its arms export restrictions [1] - The Japanese Liberal Democratic Party is reportedly discussing revisions to three security treaty documents, which may include changes to the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and an increase in defense spending [1] Group 2: China's Response and Historical Context - The Chinese defense spokesperson emphasized that Japan's identity as a defeated nation in World War II is well-established, with international legal documents prohibiting Japan from rearming [1] - There is a warning from China regarding Japan's attempts to break free from its "peace constitution," significantly increase its defense budget, and revise security policies, which are seen as threats to regional peace and stability [1] - The spokesperson called for Japan to reflect on its historical responsibilities and cease its constitutional amendments and military expansions, asserting that any attempts to revive militarism will not succeed [1]

Core Viewpoint - The remarks and actions of Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Sanae regarding Taiwan have drawn widespread criticism from various sectors in Japan and the international community, being labeled as a serious violation of international law and a threat to post-war international order [1][4]. Domestic Reactions - Approximately 1,700 local citizens protested outside the Prime Minister's residence, demanding Kishi Sanae retract her statements regarding Taiwan and stop inciting war [1]. - Former Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama criticized Kishi's comments, stating they have severely damaged Japan's national interests and called for her to correct her mistakes [1]. - The leader of the Social Democratic Party, Mizuho Fukushima, labeled Kishi's statements as unconstitutional and illegal, exceeding the government's previous positions [1]. - Former Foreign Affairs Councilor Kunihiko Tanaka remarked that Kishi's comments are detrimental to diplomacy, offering no benefits and only harm [1]. International Criticism - The President of the Japan-China Friendship Association, Hisashi Inoue, condemned Kishi's remarks as a gross interference in China's internal affairs, violating Japan's commitment to the One China principle established in the 1972 Japan-China Joint Statement [2]. - The head of the Japan-China Friendship Association expressed concerns that Kishi's statements would severely damage Japan-China relations and called for effective measures to improve the situation [2]. - Various international figures, including from Russia and South Korea, have criticized Kishi's comments as a revival of militarism and a challenge to historical justice [4][5]. Defense Policy Changes - Since taking office, Kishi Sanae's government has significantly increased defense spending and is moving towards revising Japan's security strategy, including discussions on modifying the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [2][3]. - The former Prime Minister Fumio Kishida reaffirmed his commitment to the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" as a national policy, indicating a continuity of past government positions [3]. - Concerns have been raised by various political figures and organizations regarding the potential modification of these principles, which are seen as crucial to Japan's post-war identity [3].

不久前，日本首相高市早苗公然妄称"台湾有事"可能构成日本"存亡危机事态"，暗示武力介入台湾问题 可能性。高市早苗的错误言行严重违反国际法和国际关系基本准则，严重破坏战后国际秩序，持续遭到 日本国内人士、周边国家及国际人士的反对和批评。 "在外交上毫无益处，有百害而无一利" 11月21日晚，约1700名当地民众在日本首相官邸前举行抗议活动。民众高喊"停止煽动战争""立即撤回 发言"等口号，要求高市早苗撤回涉台错误言论，呼吁不要"让日本陷入危险"。 日本前首相鸠山由纪夫11月20日再次在社交媒体发文批评高市早苗错误言论。他表示，"日中关系陷入 最恶劣的境地，日本国家利益正遭受难以估量的损失。"鸠山由纪夫引用《论语》"过则勿惮改""过而不 改，是谓过矣"的名句，要求高市早苗尽快纠正错误言论。 日本社会民主党党首福岛瑞穗在社交媒体上发文表示，高市早苗相关言论是重大问题，既违宪又违法， 甚至远远超越了迄今为止日本政府的立场。日本前外务审议官田中均在电视节目中表示，高市早苗的错 误言论"在外交上毫无益处，有百害而无一利"。 日本中国友好协会会长井上久士发表公开声明，抗议高市早苗涉台错误言论并要求其立即撤回。声明指 出，台 ...

Group 1 - The statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo are seen as a serious violation of international law and basic principles of international relations, potentially undermining regional and global peace and stability [1][2] - Russian officials express that Kishi's remarks are provocative and an attempt to escape historical truths, challenging post-World War II international agreements, especially during the 80th anniversary of the victory in the anti-fascist war [1] - Concerns are raised about the implications of Kishi's comments on Taiwan, which are viewed as dangerous and indicative of a resurgence of militarism in Japan, prompting calls for international condemnation [1][2] Group 2 - Former Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama criticizes Kishi's assertion regarding Taiwan, stating that it could lead Japan into a "survival crisis" and justifies China's criticism [2] - Japanese scholars highlight that Kishi's statements contradict Japan's pacifist constitution and violate international law, particularly regarding military intervention in Taiwan [2] - The remarks made by Kishi are characterized as reckless and a significant misstep, with implications for Japan's diplomatic stance on Taiwan and its adherence to the one-China principle [2]

Core Points - The UN Secretary-General's spokesperson emphasized the unwavering stance on denuclearization and nuclear non-proliferation, reflecting the principles set forth by Secretary-General Guterres [2] - The "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" established by Japan in 1967, which state that Japan will not possess, manufacture, or introduce nuclear weapons, remain a fundamental policy of the Japanese government [3] - Recent attempts by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi to amend these principles have faced widespread domestic opposition [3]