Core Viewpoint - The article argues that Japan's claim of "undetermined status of Taiwan" reflects a misunderstanding of history and a misjudgment of reality, revealing Japan's intentions to militarily intervene in the Taiwan Strait [1][2]. Historical Context - Japan's occupation of Taiwan began in April 1895 through an unequal treaty, and the legal basis for Taiwan's return to China is established through international agreements such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation [1][2]. - The San Francisco Peace Treaty, cited by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, is criticized as an illegal document that contradicts established international law and the principles of the post-war order [2]. Japan's Historical Actions - The article highlights the dark history of Japanese colonial rule in Taiwan, including atrocities committed against the Taiwanese people, such as mass killings during the colonial period [3]. - It questions the implications of Takaichi's statement "Japan is back," suggesting that it could indicate a resurgence of militarism rather than a commitment to peace [3]. Taiwan's Status - Taiwan is emphasized as a core interest of China, with a strong assertion of China's capability and determination to counter any interference regarding Taiwan's status [4]. - The article warns Japanese politicians against provocative actions related to Taiwan, urging them to reflect on historical responsibilities [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova has issued strong criticisms of Japan's recent actions, particularly targeting Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's remarks regarding Taiwan, emphasizing the need for Japan to reflect on its historical mistakes and warning of the serious threats posed by Japan's military actions in the region [1][2][3][4] Group 1: Historical Reflection - Zakharova highlighted the importance of Japan reflecting on its past, especially in light of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War, urging Japanese leaders to acknowledge the darker aspects of their history [2] - She criticized Kishida's provocative statements regarding Taiwan, asserting that Japan has not learned from its historical errors and continues to deny the outcomes of World War II [3] Group 2: Military Expansion Concerns - Zakharova pointed out Japan's deployment of offensive weapons on surrounding islands, which she claims undermines regional security and poses a serious threat to neighboring countries [4] - She expressed concern over Japan's militarization under U.S. influence, stating that such actions exacerbate tensions in the region and ignore the peace aspirations of local residents [4] - Zakharova warned that any moves by Japan to modify its "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" would have irreversible consequences for global strategic security [4]

日本首相高市早苗近期发表的涉台错误言论接连引发多方批评。美国哥伦比亚大学教授杰弗里·萨克斯在接受总台专访时表示，日本首相高市早苗近期发表 一系列错误言论，迈出了错误的一步。 杰弗里·萨克斯还表示，日本从未真正地正视其对外发动侵略战争的历史。他认为，日本军国主义抬头将损害日本和国际社会的利益，会将全世界卷入灾难 之中。 美国哥伦比亚大学教授 杰弗里·萨克斯：我们应该尽一切可能避免冲突，但是就日本而言，事实是，在过去的十年中，日本不那么坚持和平主义了，反而更 多地以军事为导向，日本正在增加军费开支，以更加强硬的态度发表言论。在我看来，这些都有悖于日本自身的利益。在我看来，日本从未真正地正视那些 在东亚和东南亚的战争中的所作所为。军国主义是危险且过时的，它不应该在我们的世界上存在。我认为，日本进行军事扩张，以及可能引发的大规模军备 竞赛是最大的灾难。 责编：张靖雯、王瑞景 日本从未真正正视其对外发动侵略战争的历史，日本军国主义抬头将带来"最大的灾难"。 0:00 美国哥伦比亚大学教授 杰弗里·萨克斯：高市早苗的言论，极大地加剧了中日之间的紧张关系。总体而言，实话说，日方应该谨言慎行。在1894年到1945年 期间， ...

美国哥伦比亚大学教授 杰弗里·萨克斯：我们应该尽一切可能避免冲突，但是就日本而言，事实是，在过去的十年中，日本不那么坚持和平主义了，反而更 多地以军事为导向，日本正在增加军费开支，以更加强硬的态度发表言论。在我看来，这些都有悖于日本自身的利益。在我看来，日本从未真正地正视那些 在东亚和东南亚的战争中的所作所为。军国主义是危险且过时的，它不应该在我们的世界上存在。我认为，日本进行军事扩张，以及可能引发的大规模军备 竞赛是最大的灾难。 日本军国主义抬头将带来"最大的灾难" 杰弗里·萨克斯还表示，日本从未真正地正视其对外发动侵略战争的历史。他认为，日本军国主义抬头将损害日本和国际社会的利益，会将全世界卷入灾难 之中。 日本首相高市早苗近期发表的涉台错误言论接连引发多方批评。美国哥伦比亚大学教授杰弗里·萨克斯在接受总台专访时表示，日本首相高市早苗近期发表 一系列错误言论，迈出了错误的一步。 日本从未真正正视其对外发动侵略战争的历史，日本军国主义抬头将带来"最大的灾难"。 美国哥伦比亚大学教授 杰弗里·萨克斯：高市早苗的言论，极大地加剧了中日之间的紧张关系。总体而言，实话说，日方应该谨言慎行。在1894年到1945年 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the historical and ongoing military presence of Japan in the Ryukyu Islands, highlighting the concerns of local residents regarding their rights and safety, as well as the legacy of militarism that continues to affect the region [1][7]. Historical Context - The Japanese military's strategy during World War II involved using the Ryukyu Islands as a defensive barrier against American forces, leading to significant suffering among local residents [2][4]. - The establishment of the "Okinawa Defense Army" excluded local soldiers, indicating a lack of concern for the rights of Ryukyu residents [4]. Military Policies and Impact - The "military food priority" policy implemented by the Japanese army during the war resulted in severe food shortages and suffering among the local population, with soldiers forcibly taking food from civilians [5]. - Local residents, including students, were conscripted into military service, often without proper training, and used as expendable resources in the war effort [6]. Legacy and Current Issues - Eighty years after the war, the legacy of military exploitation continues, with the presence of U.S. military bases in the Ryukyu Islands causing ongoing social and environmental issues for the local population [7][8]. - There are ongoing efforts by right-wing factions in Japan to revise historical narratives regarding the military's actions during the war, which has led to protests from local residents seeking to preserve the truth [8].

11月27日下午，国防部举行例行记者会，国防部新闻局副局长、国防部新闻发言人蒋斌大校答记者 问。 证券时报各平台所有原创内容，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载。我社保留追 究相关 行 为主体 法律责任的权利。 转载与合作可联系证券时报小助理，微信ID：SecuritiesTimes END 点击关键字可查看 记者：据报道，日本政府日前完成向美国返销"爱国者"防空导弹。这是日方对武器出口"松绑"后，首次出 口杀伤性武器。另有消息称，日本自民党开始讨论修订三份安保条约文件，其中包括修改"无核三原则"、 增加国防开支等。请问发言人对此有何评论？ 蒋斌：关于日本作为二战战败国的身份早有定论，《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》《日本投降书》等国际法 律文件明确禁止日本重新武装。需要国际社会高度警惕的是，近年来，日方逆世界潮流而动，企图突 破"和平宪法"约束，肆无忌惮扩军备武，大幅提升防卫预算，加速修订安保政策文件，放宽武器出口限 制，图谋放弃"无核三原则"，甚至妄想武力介入台海，对地区和平稳定造成严重威胁。 今年是中国人民抗日战争暨世界反法西斯战争胜利80周年。包括中国在内的亚洲乃至世界人民永远不会 忘记日本法西斯制造的惨 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Japan's recent arms export activities and potential changes to its defense policies, highlighting concerns from China regarding Japan's military expansion and historical context related to World War II [1] Group 1: Japan's Arms Export and Defense Policy Changes - Japan has completed the export of "Patriot" air defense missiles to the United States, marking its first export of lethal weapons since relaxing its arms export restrictions [1] - The Japanese Liberal Democratic Party is reportedly discussing revisions to three security treaty documents, which may include changes to the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and an increase in defense spending [1] Group 2: China's Response and Historical Context - The Chinese defense spokesperson emphasized that Japan's identity as a defeated nation in World War II is well-established, with international legal documents prohibiting Japan from rearming [1] - There is a warning from China regarding Japan's attempts to break free from its "peace constitution," significantly increase its defense budget, and revise security policies, which are seen as threats to regional peace and stability [1] - The spokesperson called for Japan to reflect on its historical responsibilities and cease its constitutional amendments and military expansions, asserting that any attempts to revive militarism will not succeed [1]

历史不会被遗忘，更不会被篡改。80年前，我们打败日本侵略者，光复台湾，终结日本对台湾的侵占掠夺。80年后的今天，谁再企图挑战中国核心利益，妄 想阻挠中国统一大业，中国政府、中国人民、中国军队决不答应、决不容忍。日前，日本宣布在敏感区域部署导弹，距离台湾仅110公里，不断加剧区域紧 张。令世人警惕的是，日本右翼势力正极力突破"和平宪法"束缚，在穷兵黩武道路上越走越远，把日本和地区引向灾祸。台湾是中国的台湾。我们决不允许 外部势力染指中国台湾地区，决不允许日本军国主义死灰复燃。奉劝高市莫要再搞事！ MI 11 10:0 1 I y 1-- 1 11 1 (1) 41 / h 111 ...

Core Viewpoint - Japan is attempting to break free from the constraints of international law as a defeated nation in World War II, leading to a potential resurgence of militarism, which poses a serious threat to peace and stability in Asia and the world [1][4]. Group 1: Japan's Recent Actions - Japan has made several dangerous moves, including the first export of lethal weapons since easing restrictions in 2023, discussions within the ruling party to revise security documents, and plans to deploy offensive weapons on islands near Taiwan [1][3]. - These actions are seen as a blatant disregard for international obligations and a significant challenge to the post-war order recognized by the international community [1][2]. Group 2: International Legal Framework - Key international documents, such as the UN Charter and the Potsdam Declaration, clearly outline Japan's obligations as a defeated nation, including the complete disarmament and prohibition of maintaining industries that could lead to rearmament [2][3]. - Japan's commitment to peace is further reinforced by the Japan-China Joint Statement and Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution, which emphasizes a path of peaceful development and the renunciation of war [2][3]. Group 3: Domestic and International Reactions - There is growing concern from the international community regarding Japan's right-wing movements that challenge fundamental principles of peace, including calls for military intervention in Taiwan and discussions to abandon the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [3][4]. - Scholars and officials from other countries, including Malaysia and Russia, have criticized Japan's leadership for its historical misconceptions, while domestic protests have emerged against the Prime Minister's controversial statements [3][4]. Group 4: Historical Context and Responsibility - The historical context emphasizes the importance of acknowledging past mistakes to avoid repeating tragedies, with a call for Japan to adhere to international law and its own peace constitution [4]. - The international community has a responsibility to uphold the post-war order and ensure that Japan's militaristic tendencies do not resurface, with a warning that any unilateral actions by Japan could lead to a reevaluation of its historical transgressions [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the controversial actions and statements of Takashi Sanae, a Japanese politician known for her right-wing views, including her denial of historical events related to Japan's wartime actions and her advocacy for changes to Japan's pacifist constitution [1][3][5]. Group 1: Historical Denial - Takashi Sanae has publicly denied the Nanjing Massacre, which resulted in the deaths of 300,000 Chinese people during World War II [5]. - She has also denied the forced recruitment of "comfort women," with over 200,000 Chinese women being subjected to this during the Japanese invasion from 1931 to 1945 [7]. Group 2: Political Actions - Since her election to the Japanese Diet in 1993, Takashi has advocated for amending Japan's pacifist constitution and expanding the Japan Self-Defense Forces [9]. - She has visited the Yasukuni Shrine more than 10 times since 2014, a site that is controversial due to its association with Japan's militaristic past [14][16]. Group 3: Comparison with Other Politicians - The article contrasts Takashi's views with those of former Japanese Prime Ministers like Murayama Tomiichi and Hatoyama Yukio, who have shown a willingness to acknowledge Japan's wartime actions and express remorse [18][19].