🚨Who really has your back — big tech or the government?Episode 3 of #PrivacyinMotion with @MidnightNtwrk and @brave looks at the lack of oversight in today’s data-driven world — and how privacy protocols could be our modern-day Bill of Rights.🎥 Watch the full video here👇 ...

Tensions between the US and China escalating beyond the trade war. From tech, China is a competitor to Taiwan and remember that spy balloon. State of our union is apparently under Chinese surveillance.Washington now working to defend the US military from surveillance. Congress and the president trying to prevent China from buying land near bases over national security concerns. And now one lawmaker saying the country is already inside them through a nutritional company selling protein powder and vitamins to ...

Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents will be granted access to the personal information of millions of Medicaid enroles in an effort to track down anyone who may be in the US illegally. The agreement between the Department of Homeland Security and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was described by a DHS spokesperson as an initiative to ensure undocumented immigrants don't receive Medicaid benefits. ICE agents would be able to see the personal information of about 79 million Medicaid enrol ...

The U.K. set up a secret project to relocate thousands of Afghans to Britain, after an official accidentally disclosed personal information of 18,700 Afghans who had requested to flee https://t.co/i7K3ATgjX9 ...

Core Viewpoint - Shareholders are seeking to hold Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, and other Meta officials accountable for over $8 billion in fines related to privacy practices, with a trial set to begin in Delaware's Court of Chancery [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The upcoming trial will focus on the Cambridge Analytica scandal, which is a significant issue in Meta's history, and may involve testimonies from other major tech figures [2][3]. - Shareholders claim that Zuckerberg, Sandberg, and former VP Konstantinos Papamiltiadis violated their fiduciary duties by failing to ensure compliance with a 2012 FTC consent order, which they argue contributed to the Cambridge Analytica incident [4][6]. - The shareholders' complaint highlights a 2019 decision by Facebook's Board of Directors to approve a $5 billion settlement with the FTC, asserting that directors ignored warning signs leading to the scandal [6][11]. Group 2: Background Information - In 2012, the FTC mandated that Facebook must provide users with clear notice and obtain their consent before sharing information beyond privacy settings, which was not adequately enforced [5][11]. - The Cambridge Analytica scandal involved the improper acquisition of data from up to 87 million users, leading to significant global investigations and a record $5 billion fine from the FTC in 2019 [11][12]. - The shareholders' attorneys reference a UK parliamentary investigation that concluded the scandal could have been avoided if Facebook had adhered to the 2012 consent decree [11]. Group 3: Defendants' Position - Attorneys for Zuckerberg and other defendants argue that there is no evidence suggesting that Meta's CEO acted unlawfully, claiming that the company was not indifferent to compliance [12][13]. - The case is described as involving alleged wrongdoing on a "truly colossal scale," indicating the seriousness of the accusations against the defendants [15]. Group 4: Judicial Context - The trial will be overseen by Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick, who has previously made notable rulings in high-profile cases, which has led to some discontent within the tech community regarding Delaware's Court of Chancery [16].

Data Privacy & Value - The report highlights that personal data is worth billions of dollars [1] - Tech giants like Meta and Google are profiting from user data [1] - Users are not receiving any compensation for their personal information [1] Media & Awareness - The report is part of the "PrivacyinMotion" series [1] - The series is created in collaboration with @MidnightNtwrk and @brave [1] - The report exposes the practices of tech giants regarding data usage [1]

Core Concept - PinLink AI focuses on personal AI, enabling users to own their data, run their AI privately, and earn rewards [1] - The platform prioritizes privacy, allowing users to reclaim control over their data and train their own AI without relying on Big Tech [1] Technology & Functionality - PinLink AI is built on a Personal AI Protocol, comprising Data Connectors, On-Device LLMs, and God Models (Validator Layer) [2] - Data Connectors pull in user-approved data using Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs), ensuring data privacy and security [2] - On-Device LLMs enable private AI model execution locally [2] - God Models (Validator Layer) ensure the AI remains aligned and trustworthy [2] Tokenomics & Utility - $PIN is the utility token that powers the PinLink AI network [2] - $PIN secures the network, rewards data contributions and AI services, and powers governance and airdrops [3] - Users can now farm PIN Points via the mobile app or Telegram mini app [3]

Data Collection and Usage - Social media platforms collect extensive user data, including location, browsing history, contacts, and even health and fitness information [5][6] - Platforms like Facebook can infer sensitive information such as physical address, political and religious beliefs, and sexual orientation [7][8] - Companies are collecting data not just for targeted advertising but to control user behavior and decision-making [27] - Criminals exploit readily available personal data to manipulate individuals, emphasizing that users are targeted, not their devices [23] Security Vulnerabilities and Exploits - Applications with SMS access can be exploited to read and send OTPs, leading to financial losses [12][15] - Criminals are hacking individuals to reach their devices [23] - Even seemingly harmless actions, like a child installing an app for gaming currency, can have severe consequences [22] - User activities across devices linked to the same Gmail account can be tracked and exploited [18] Digital Footprint and Privacy - Individuals leave a unique digital fingerprint based on their internet usage patterns [24] - Google tracks user locations and activities precisely over many years, creating a detailed timeline [10][11] - This data can be used as court-admissible evidence [11] Recommendations - Users should be aware of the permissions granted to applications on their phones [13] - Users can check their Google activity to see what data is being tracked [17] - The industry should recognize that users are products of the data they consume, influencing their thoughts and aspirations [2]

Data Privacy Concerns - Tech giants like Meta and Google have built empires on personal information [1] - Users receive no compensation for their personal data [1] Industry Focus - The PrivacyinMotion series, created with @MidnightNtwrk and @brave, exposes the issue [1] - The data is worth billions of dollars [1]

Google was told by a California jury to pay $314 million over claims that it illegally used Android users’ cellular data to collect information without their knowledge https://t.co/BuiKwY5g2J ...