RT CBB (@Cbb0fe)Felt smart hedging on @HyperliquidX 10% of $XPL allocation1x short and a lot of collateral to cover2.5M loss ggwpnever touching isolated market I guess 😅😅 ...

Core Viewpoint - AGNC Investment Corp. and Starwood Property Trust, Inc. are two prominent players in the mortgage real estate investment trusts (mREITs) sector, both providing attractive long-term returns and substantial dividend yields. The analysis aims to compare their strengths, risks, and growth potential to determine which offers a better investment opportunity at present [2]. Group 1: AGNC Investment Corp. - AGNC employs an active portfolio-management strategy, regularly adjusting its holdings and implementing hedges to respond to market changes, positioning itself defensively against volatility [3]. - As of June 30, 2025, AGNC maintained a significant interest rate hedge covering 89% of its outstanding balance, which may enhance cash flow stability and support long-term growth [4]. - The company holds $73.3 billion in Agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS), benefiting from government guarantees, which are expected to yield attractive risk-adjusted returns despite market volatility [5]. - AGNC's liquidity, including unencumbered cash and Agency MBS, was reported at $6.4 billion as of June 30, 2025, with a modest increase in leverage to 7.6X [6]. - AGNC has a high dividend yield of 14.66%, exceeding the industry average of 12.12% [17]. - The Zacks Consensus Estimate indicates a year-over-year earnings decline of 15.4% for AGNC in 2025 [20]. Group 2: Starwood Property Trust, Inc. - Starwood Property specializes in commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) and manages a portfolio of nearly $27 billion as of June 30, 2025, allowing for stable income generation [7]. - The company has actively optimized its portfolio through strategic acquisitions and divestitures, including the sale of 16 retail properties for $387.1 million in February 2024 [8]. - Starwood's liquidity position is strong, with cash and cash equivalents of $475 million and no short-term debt as of June 30, 2025 [10]. - Starwood is trading at a 12-month forward price-to-tangible book (P/TB) of 1.06X, which is a discount compared to the industry average, making it a more attractive option for value investors [14]. - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Starwood suggests a year-over-year earnings decline of 6.4% for 2025, but a rise of 7.7% for 2026 [23]. Group 3: Comparative Analysis - In the past six months, STWD shares increased by 4.8%, while AGNC shares rose by 1.7%, outperforming the industry growth of 0.8% [11]. - AGNC is trading at a premium, while STWD trades at a discount, indicating a stronger earnings outlook for STWD [9][14]. - STWD's dividend yield is 9.53%, supported by more sustainable fundamentals and a clearer path to earnings growth compared to AGNC [17][28]. - AGNC is characterized by a defensive income strategy through Agency MBS and hedging, while STWD demonstrates greater resilience and flexibility with disciplined portfolio management [27][28]. - Currently, AGNC holds a Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell), whereas Starwood Property has a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), indicating a preference for STWD among investors [29].

Core Insights - Annaly Capital (NYSE:NLY) had a normal quarter with minor changes, experiencing a slight decrease in the value of its assets, which was anticipated, and the stock is currently considered overpriced [1][15] Financial Performance - NLY recorded a minor quarterly book value (BV) decrease that aligned with expectations, with a total net valuation gain of $147 million during Q2 2025, outperforming the projected gain of $110 million [2][10] - Core earnings/EAD for NLY matched expectations with a slight increase compared to Q1 2025, driven by a larger on-balance sheet portfolio size [4][10] - The hedging coverage ratio decreased from 102% to 95%, which was anticipated, indicating a slight reduction in risk management strategies [3][6] Valuation Metrics - The reported GAAP BV per share was $18.45, slightly above the projected $18.35, reflecting a 0.54% outperformance [10] - The stock price is currently at $21.14, leading to a dividend yield of 13.25% and a payout ratio of 96%, indicating a high dividend relative to earnings [12] Market Position - NLY's performance in terms of BV decrease and core earnings increase is expected to outperform most agency mREIT peers, suggesting a relatively strong position in the market [5][14] - The company remains in a good position to maintain its quarterly dividend of $0.70 per common share, despite core earnings only slightly covering this amount [14]

Gold ETF Market Trends - Gold ETFs are experiencing unprecedented interest, driven by risk and uncertainty in the market [2] - Gold ETFs can serve as a hedge against market downturns and unclear risks in portfolios [3] - While gold ETF flows are strong, their percentage of the S&P 500 market capitalization has decreased from 6% to 03% over the last decade, suggesting potentially less hedging in portfolios relative to the equity market [6] - The European ETF market accounts for approximately 35% of the global gold-backed ETF market [11] - Asia, particularly China, India, and Japan, has seen significant growth in gold ETF markets in the last two years [11] Factors Influencing Gold Prices - Central banks' increasing allocation to gold reserves is a significant driver of gold prices [15] - Central banks are diversifying away from the dollar and into gold [15] - Geopolitical risks, Fed decisions, fiscal spending, and inflation are key factors influencing gold prices [13] Tariffs and Market Impact - The market anticipates that gold in the investment and wholesale context will not be subject to tariffs [17] - President Trump's statement on social media has calmed the market regarding potential gold tariffs [18] Innovation in Gold Products - It is difficult to improve upon existing gold ETFs like GLD for tracking the spot price of gold [22][23] - The industry is exploring digitization to improve access to the gold market, potentially creating a "stable gold" alongside ETFs [25][26]

Hedging is a risk management strategy where investors take an offsetting position in another asset to limit exposure. It’s a core tactic for reducing potential losses. Learn more: https://t.co/bK2034WieF https://t.co/lzH8kfKaZT ...

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - In Q2 2025, Endeavor Silver reported revenue of $85 million, a 46% increase compared to the prior year, driven by higher precious metal prices and increased production [6] - The company produced 1.5 million ounces of silver and 7,800 ounces of gold, totaling approximately 2.5 million silver equivalent ounces, representing a 13% increase compared to 2024 [5] - Mine operating cash flow before working capital changes rose by 21%, while cash costs were $15.35 per ounce of payable silver, and all-in sustaining costs were $25.26 per ounce [6] - The company reported a net loss of $20 million for the period, primarily due to operating losses during the commissioning of Terronera and increased general and administrative expenses [6][7] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The integration of the newly acquired Colpa mine is ongoing, with production expected to align with historical performance of approximately 5 million silver equivalent ounces annually [9] - The company anticipates achieving an annualized production profile of 20 million silver equivalent ounces by 2026, combining output from Terronera, Guanacevi, and Bolanitos [10] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - As of June 30, the company's cash position was $52 million, but working capital was negative, which is by design as Terronera approaches commercial production [7] - The company is focusing on optimizing throughput and recovery rates at Terronera, with throughput averaging between 1,900 and 2,000 tons per day and silver and gold recoveries averaging 71% and 67%, respectively [7][16] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on achieving commercial production at Terronera and integrating the Colpa acquisition, which is expected to enhance its position as a leading mid-tier silver producer [5][8] - Management is exploring additional acquisition opportunities but emphasizes the need for a breather to ensure Terronera reaches commercial production and generates positive cash flow [23][24] Management Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in the ramp-up of Terronera, targeting commercial production by the end of July 2025, and expects recoveries to improve as operational adjustments are made [16][29] - The company anticipates working capital to improve in the second half of the year as cash flows from Terronera are realized [44] Other Important Information - The company is advancing the Pitoria project, focusing on upgrading inferred resources and obtaining necessary permits for tailings dam and economic studies [10][78] - The integration of the Colpa mine is expected to take time, with management working on validating historical resources before providing production guidance [9][75] Q&A Session Summary Question: Update on commercial production at Terronera - Management indicated that the ramp-up is progressing well, with recoveries expected to align with historical averages as operational adjustments are made [16][29] Question: Operating costs at Colpa - Management noted that integration costs are impacting current operating costs but expects them to align with historical performance as operations stabilize [30][32] Question: Hedging strategy moving forward - The company prefers not to hedge precious metals, focusing instead on providing exposure to silver price movements for shareholders [41][42] Question: Exploration potential at Colpa - Management is reorganizing the exploration team to adopt a more systematic approach to exploration, with results expected soon [55][56] Question: Timeline for updated technical report for Colpa - An updated technical report is anticipated by mid-2026, as validation of historical resources is underway [75][76]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported EBITDAX of over $155 million for the quarter, with margins remaining strong at $33.58 per barrel of oil equivalent despite lower commodity prices [5][6][27] - Capital expenditures (CapEx) for the second quarter were 30% lower than the first quarter, aligning with the company's internal expectations [5][15] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reduced its drilling activity to one rig in mid-May, which impacted production levels but was a strategic decision to manage capital effectively [5][15] - The first simulfrac job was completed successfully, resulting in savings of approximately $400,000 per well, which is about a 10% reduction in total completion costs [19][20] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company has hedged over 50% of its volumes for the second half of the year with a weighted average floor price of over $62 per barrel [12][13] - Approximately 90% of the second half 2025 gas volumes are hedged at a price of $4.43 per MMBtu [13] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company aims to maintain capital discipline and flexibility in its operations, with plans to add a second rig in September while monitoring market conditions [15][26] - The recent refinancing of the term loan and revolving credit facility has solidified the company's credit profile and extended debt maturities to September 2028 [7][27] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in achieving production guidance for 2025 despite fluctuations in quarterly volumes due to the timing of well completions [5][42] - The company remains focused on long-term value creation and is prepared to adapt its development plans based on market conditions [26][28] Other Important Information - The company's solar farm has generated significant power savings and reduced CO2 emissions, contributing to its sustainability goals [22] - The company is exploring hybrid simulfrac operations to increase efficiency in completions [38] Q&A Session Summary Question: How much liquidity does the company want to maintain? - The company aims to maintain a liquidity level of $200 million to $250 million, depending on oil prices and hedging strategies [30][31] Question: Can you explain the swings in working capital changes? - The changes in working capital were due to reducing from two rigs to one, with expectations for stability in the third quarter and potential increases as a second rig is added [32][34] Question: Are there any limiting factors on using simulfrac for more completions? - The ability to use simulfrac is influenced by the number of wells on a pad and the current rig count, but the company is exploring ways to implement it more broadly [36][38] Question: How does the inventory of wells in progress affect the decision to add a second rig? - The current inventory of 20 wells is manageable with one rig, but the company will monitor the situation as it progresses [39] Question: What impact will the Middle Spraberry inventory have on year-end reserves? - The company anticipates a significant increase in PUDs associated with Middle Spraberry wells by the end of 2025 compared to 2024 [40][41] Question: What are the production expectations for the next couple of quarters? - Production may fluctuate due to the timing of well completions, but the yearly guidance remains solid [42]

Strategic Initiatives Update - Amplify Energy Corp. is focused on simplifying its portfolio, becoming more oil-weighted, reducing debt, lowering operating costs, and streamlining the organization [2][3] - The company has engaged TenOaks Energy Advisors to explore market interest for the complete divestiture of its assets in East Texas and Oklahoma, with offers expected later in Q3 2025 [5] - Amplify divested its non-operated assets in the Eagle Ford for $23 million, which closed on July 1, 2025 [5] Key Financial Results - In Q2 2025, Amplify reported net income of approximately $6.4 million, a significant improvement from a net loss of $5.9 million in the prior quarter, primarily due to a gain on commodity derivatives [8][10] - Adjusted EBITDA for Q2 2025 was $19.0 million, comparable to the previous quarter despite lower commodity prices [9][10] - Average daily production increased to 19.1 MBoepd, up approximately 7% from the prior quarter [6][10] Production and Operations - The company completed the C54 well at Beta, which has cumulative gross production of 90,000 barrels of oil and is currently producing approximately 850 gross Bopd [6][7] - In East Texas, four non-operated wells were brought online, currently producing 13 Mmcfe/d net to Amplify's interest, with expected payback in less than 18 months and IRRs greater than 45% [6][28] - The product mix for Q2 2025 was 48% crude oil, 16% NGLs, and 36% natural gas, reflecting a strategic increase in oil weighting [15] Capital Investment and Guidance - Cash capital investment in Q2 2025 was approximately $25.5 million, with a focus on development drilling and facility projects at Beta [22][23] - Amplify plans to invest approximately 95% of its 2025 capital by the end of Q3 2025, with a significant decrease in capital investments expected in the second half of the year [22][32] - Updated full-year 2025 guidance includes net average daily production estimates of 18.5 to 20.0 MBoe/d and an Adjusted EBITDA range of $80 to $100 million [32][33] Hedging and Liquidity - Amplify maintains a robust hedge book, recently adding crude oil swaps for 2026 and 2027 at a weighted average price of $62.79 [35] - As of June 30, 2025, total debt was $130 million, with a net debt to LTM Adjusted EBITDA ratio of 1.5x [11][13]

Options data show traders hedging for Bitcoin drop below $100K and Ethereum below $3K, Derive says https://t.co/gcOJff5zFy ...

Core Insights - SM Energy reported strong operational performance in Q2 2025, with record production and earnings exceeding market expectations [1][5][7] - The company achieved adjusted earnings per share of $1.50, surpassing the analyst consensus of $1.25, and revenue of $785.1 million, slightly above the $781.6 million estimate [1][2] - The integration of Uinta Basin assets significantly contributed to production growth, with net production reaching 19.0 million barrels of oil equivalent [1][6] Financial Performance - Adjusted EBITDAX increased by 17% year-over-year, reflecting improved operational efficiency [2][7] - Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $571.1 million, a 19.9% increase from the previous year [2][7] - The company reported a net debt of $2.63 billion as of June 30, 2025, with a goal to reduce net debt to adjusted EBITDAX to 1.0x by year-end [7] Production and Costs - Net production reached 19.0 million barrels of oil equivalent, averaging 209.1 thousand barrels per day, a 32% increase year-over-year [5][6] - Lease operating expenses per barrel increased by 15% quarter-over-quarter, and transportation costs more than doubled year-over-year [8] - Capital expenditure guidance was raised by approximately $75 million, reflecting increased spending on non-operated projects [8][13] Strategic Focus - The company is focused on integrating and optimizing Uinta Basin assets to enhance production efficiency and strengthen its balance sheet [3][4] - Hedging strategies are in place, with approximately 45% of oil and natural gas volumes hedged for the latter half of 2025 [10] - The company aims to prioritize debt reduction and operational efficiency while managing cost pressures [14] Market Factors - Realized oil prices averaged $62.04 per barrel, while gas prices were $2.15 per thousand cubic feet [9] - The company sold about 15-20% of Uinta oil to local refineries, reducing transportation costs [9] - The estimated cash tax payments for 2025 were reduced to approximately $10 million, improving near-term cash flow [11] Future Guidance - Production guidance remains unchanged at 200-215 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day, with an increased oil cut expectation of 53-54% [13] - Capital spending guidance is now approximately $1.375 billion, primarily for non-operated projects [13] - Management emphasizes operational efficiency and capital discipline as key themes moving forward [14]