Core Viewpoint - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency open meeting regarding the situation in Iran, with China urging the U.S. to contribute positively to peace and stability in the Middle East rather than escalating tensions [1][2] Group 1: China's Position on Iran - China emphasizes the importance of respecting the sovereignty of Iran and believes that the Iranian people should determine their own affairs [1] - The Chinese representative highlighted that military threats from the U.S. have exacerbated tensions in the region, calling for restraint and dialogue instead of military action [1][2] - China advocates for the principles of the UN Charter and international law, opposing the use or threat of force in international relations [1] Group 2: Regional Stability and Peace - The current security situation in the Middle East is described as fragile, with high risks of turmoil and war, and there is a strong desire among regional populations for peace and development [2] - China notes that most regional countries are concerned about military confrontation and sincerely wish to resolve disputes through dialogue [2] - The call for peace and development is framed as a common expectation among nations, with a warning that reliance on military force and interference will only lead to more conflict and hatred [2]

俄外交部："任何无视俄在北极地区利益的行为将遭反击"。 扎哈罗娃补充说，"北极地区日益紧张的局势是北约破坏稳定行动的直接后果。"她强调， 任何企图无视俄罗斯在北极的合法利益的行为都将遭到反击。 扎哈罗娃还对格陵兰岛周边局势表示关注。俄方认为，所有与格陵兰岛相关的问题都必须 严格在国际法框架内解决，并充分考虑岛上居民的利益。 来源：中国新闻网 End 欢迎分享给你的朋友！ 出品 | 中国能源报（c n e n e rg y） 责编丨李慧颖 据俄罗斯媒体当地时间1 5日报道，俄罗斯外交部发言人扎哈罗娃表示，对于任何无视俄在 北极地区利益的行为，俄方将对此作出回应。 ▲ 俄罗斯外交部发言人扎哈罗娃（资料图） 据报道，在评论有关北约国家正讨论设立名为"北约哨兵"的联合特遣部队消息时，扎哈罗 娃回应称，"该计划应被视为西方国家试图对北极地区强加其秩序的又一次挑衅。" ...

美国3日凌晨对委内瑞拉发动大规模军事打击，美军突入委首都加拉加斯，强行控制委总统马杜罗及其 妻子并将他们带到美国。 时钟拨回那天凌晨。加拉加斯一处广场上，乌赛切照常在市政岗位值守，曾经的战友迪亚斯则在临近的 军事设施执勤。 "先是听见很远的飞机声，很不正常，那时候不该有训练。"几秒后，灯光骤然熄灭，广场陷入黑暗，紧 接着第一声爆炸传来，震动透过地面扑来，"不重，但很清楚"。凭着经验，他判断炸点距离不超过两公 里。 恐慌迅速蔓延，他脑子里蹦出的第一个念头不是逃，而是去寻找58岁的同事迪亚斯。停电的黑暗中，乌 赛切找不到摩托车，只好狂奔。迪亚斯被发现的时候，瘫倒在地，浑身发抖："乌赛切，我们怎么办？ 炸弹要落在这里怎么办？" 委内瑞拉首都加拉加斯的夜色降临，退役军人、现市政工作人员乌赛切走在街头，巡视着自己辖区内的 路灯、下水道等设施。忽然路上一辆车呼啸而过，他本能地一惊——因为那一晚的爆炸声，在他记忆里 挥之不去。 "那一晚，我失去了曾经的战友。"乌赛切轻声告诉记者。 9年前，乌赛切进入委内瑞拉一所军校的士官班，他在那里结识了迪亚斯，两人同住一间宿舍。乌赛切 回忆说："每次他家人来看他，他都会主动去叫我和几名生 ...

0:00 当地时间14日，俄罗斯外长拉夫罗夫表示，美国1月3日对委内瑞拉的袭击违反了国际法，破坏了国际秩 序，俄方将恪守与委内瑞拉达成的所有协议。 责编：秦雅楠、侯兴川 俄罗斯外长 拉夫罗夫：我们认为美国袭击委内瑞拉违反了国际法，全球绝大多数国家也都这么认为， 只有美西方国家会试图回避相关国际法问题，大家都清楚美国严重违反了国际法。总而言之，我们看 到，美国在委内瑞拉的军事行动告诉我们，美国实际上正在破坏多年来他们曾参与建立的国际秩序。 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses a phone call between Wang Yi, a member of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee and Foreign Minister, and Iranian Foreign Minister Amir-Abdollahian, focusing on the recent unrest in Iran attributed to external forces [1] - Amir-Abdollahian emphasized that Iran has restored stability and is prepared to respond to external interference while keeping the door open for dialogue, expecting China to play a greater role in regional peace and stability [1] - Wang Yi reiterated China's stance on adhering to the purposes of the UN Charter and international law, opposing the use or threat of force in international relations, and advocating for dialogue to resolve differences [1]

当地时间14日，俄罗斯外长拉夫罗夫表示，美国1月3日对委内瑞拉的袭击违反了国际法，破坏了国际秩 序，俄方将恪守与委内瑞拉达成的所有协议。 俄罗斯外长 拉夫罗夫：我们认为美国袭击委内瑞拉违反了国际法，全球绝大多数国家也都这么认为， 只有美西方国家会试图回避相关国际法问题，大家都清楚美国严重违反了国际法。总而言之，我们看 到，美国在委内瑞拉的军事行动告诉我们，美国实际上正在破坏多年来他们曾参与建立的国际秩序。 ...

最新消息。 德国国防部当地时间1月14日晚表示，应丹麦要求，德国将于1月15日向格陵兰岛派遣13名士兵，作为与欧洲其他国家联合开展的一项考察任务。德国国防 部称，该任务旨在探索可能采取的军事措施，以加强该地区的安全保障。 当天，法国军方表示，法国将与欧洲多国伙伴共同参与在格陵兰岛开展的一项军事任务，以支持丹麦维护当地安全。 当天早些时候，瑞典和挪威也宣布将向格陵兰岛派遣军事人员。 格陵兰岛位于北美洲东北方，是世界第一大岛，也是丹麦自治领地，有高度自治权，国防和外交事务由丹麦政府掌管。美国目前在格陵兰岛设有一处军事 基地。美国总统特朗普2025年上任以来多次扬言要得到格陵兰岛，并声称不排除动用武力的可能性。对此，丹麦等欧洲国家强烈反对。 欧洲议会谴责特朗普政府涉格陵兰岛言论 当地时间1月14日，欧洲议会发表声明表示，支持多边主义和基于规则的国际秩序，支持格陵兰岛和丹麦，明确谴责美国总统特朗普就格陵兰岛发表的言 论。 声明表示，欧洲议会坚定支持多边主义和基于规则的国际秩序。任何破坏丹麦和格陵兰岛主权及领土完整的企图都违反了国际法和《联合国宪章》。声明 强调关于丹麦和格陵兰岛的决定完全属于丹麦和格陵兰岛，并应该依据 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of the U.S. military operation against Venezuela, termed "Absolute Resolve," highlighting its legality under international and domestic law, and the potential consequences for international order and norms [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][13]. Summary by Sections U.S. Military Action - The U.S. launched a military operation against Venezuela, capturing President Maduro and his wife, which was characterized as a unilateral action without UN approval or congressional authorization [1][2]. - The operation involved direct military engagement, including missile strikes and air assaults, which are seen as violations of the principle of non-violence in international law [3][4]. Legal Violations - The operation is argued to violate international law, particularly the UN Charter, as it lacked Security Council authorization and did not meet the criteria for self-defense [3][4]. - The action is also viewed as a breach of U.S. domestic law, as it bypassed Congress's authority to declare war, raising concerns about executive overreach [5][6][7]. Judicial Authority - The article explores whether U.S. courts have jurisdiction to try Maduro, despite the illegal nature of his capture, citing the Ker-Frisbie principle which allows courts to proceed with trials regardless of the legality of the arrest [8][9]. - It discusses the complexities surrounding Maduro's status as a sitting president, which typically grants him immunity from prosecution under international law, but suggests that U.S. courts may not recognize this immunity due to political considerations [10][11][12]. Broader Implications - The article warns that the U.S. action sets a dangerous precedent, undermining international law and the principle of sovereign equality, potentially leading to a more unstable global order [12][13].

Core Viewpoint - The independent human rights experts appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council expressed serious concerns regarding the statements made by the U.S. President about Greenland, emphasizing that any claims to seize or control territory under the guise of national security or economic interests reflect a colonial mindset that the international community has long rejected [1][2] Group 1 - The U.S. President's repeated questioning of Denmark's legitimate sovereignty over Greenland and the assertion that the U.S. needs to own and control Greenland are highlighted as violations of the United Nations Charter [1] - The experts warned that any threats or use of force to alter Greenland's political status or challenge another country's sovereignty clearly violate international law [2] - The pattern of U.S. military aggression, including attacks on sovereign nations and the use of extrajudicial killings, is noted as potentially causing irreversible damage to global order [1] Group 2 - The rights of the people of Greenland to fully and freely exercise their right to self-determination are emphasized as a core principle of the United Nations [1] - Any unilateral attempts to change Greenland's territorial or constitutional status are stated to not only violate international law but also threaten stability in the Arctic and broader regions [2] - The U.S. is urged to reaffirm its commitment to the United Nations Charter and to resolve international disputes peacefully while respecting the sovereignty of nations and the self-determination rights of all peoples [2]

Group 1 - The article discusses President Trump's call for Iranian protesters to continue their demonstrations against the government, indicating potential U.S. action against Iran's suppression of dissent [1] - Iran's UN representative, Amir Saeed Iravani, accused Trump of violating international law by encouraging protests and government takeover [1][2] - The Iranian Revolutionary Guard has stated it is prepared for any attacks, highlighting the heightened tensions in the region [1] Group 2 - Iravani's letter to the UN Secretary-General and Security Council urged international condemnation of U.S. and Israeli interference in Iran's internal affairs, claiming it poses a direct threat to Iran's sovereignty [2] - Russia condemned external interference in Iran, warning that any repeat of U.S. military actions could have disastrous consequences for regional and international security [2] - Gulf Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, have warned the U.S. against military action, citing potential disruptions to the oil market and domestic stability [4] Group 3 - Trump suggested that Americans in Iran should consider evacuation and expressed concern over the casualties from the Iranian government's crackdown on protests [3] - He mentioned that aid for Iranian citizens would be forthcoming in various forms, including economic assistance, while also referencing past military actions against Iran [3] - Reports indicate that Iran is seeking to restart nuclear negotiations with the U.S., moving from a previous stance of indirect talks to direct negotiations [4] Group 4 - The protests in Iran stem from severe inflation and currency devaluation, representing one of the most significant internal challenges the country has faced in decades [5] - In response to escalating tensions, the U.S. is reportedly withdrawing some personnel from its major bases in the Middle East [5]