近期，日本首相高市早苗发表的涉台错误言论，引发多方强烈批评。多国人士表示，这一错误言论严重违反国际法，危及国际秩序，加剧亚洲地区紧张局 势，国际社会应当警惕日本外交政策中军事化倾向。 欧洲议会议员、捷克和摩拉维亚共产党主席 卡特日娜·科内奇纳：日本必须认识到，台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分。这不仅符合国际法，也符合历史事 实。如果日本不承认这一点，国际法就只是一纸空文，我认为这是一个巨大的错误。事实上，日本目前的举动只会给亚洲带来紧张局势和危险。 泰国国防学院前校长 苏拉西上将：我认为日本首相高市早苗的言论是日本军国主义思想的复活，这是各方应该警惕的。这不仅是对中国内政的肆意挑衅， 也是对二战后国际秩序的公然挑衅。世界上只有一个中国，这是国际社会的共识，台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分。 约翰内斯堡大学研究员 西佐·恩卡拉：高市早苗发出以武力介入的威胁已经违反了国际法和《联合国宪章》，高市早苗的言论侵犯了中国的主权，也是在干 涉中国内政。结合日本为人熟知的历史记录来看，这样的表态是危险的，具有挑衅性的。 俄罗斯科学院中国与现代亚洲研究所教授、首席研究员 德米特里·斯特列利佐夫：岸田文雄担任首相时期，日本提出到2 ...

Core Points - The phone call between Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump on November 24, 2025, reflects a generally stable and positive trend in China-U.S. relations since the Busan meeting, which is welcomed by both nations and the international community [1][2] - Xi emphasized the importance of Taiwan's return to China as a crucial part of the post-war international order, while Trump acknowledged China's significant role in World War II and expressed understanding of the Taiwan issue's importance to China [1][2] - The conversation also addressed trade, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and Taiwan, with the call lasting one hour [1][2] Summary by Sections China-U.S. Relations - The call is the first since the Busan meeting and the third time this year that Taiwan has been specifically mentioned in discussions between the two leaders [2] - Analysts suggest that the call provides momentum for implementing the consensus reached at the Busan meeting, especially in light of recent tensions in the Asia-Pacific region due to provocative remarks from Japanese politicians [1][2] Taiwan Issue - The Taiwan issue has been a recurring topic in recent communications, with Xi previously urging the U.S. to handle the matter with caution to avoid conflict [2][3] - Analysts note that the U.S. has maintained a calm and pragmatic approach to Taiwan under Trump's administration, adhering to previous commitments [2][3] Regional Tensions - The call occurred against a backdrop of rising tensions due to Japan's provocative actions and statements regarding Taiwan, which have drawn criticism from China [4][5] - China's Foreign Ministry has condemned Japan's military deployments near Taiwan and emphasized the need for vigilance from neighboring countries and the international community [4][5] Historical Context - The leaders' discussion included references to World War II, highlighting the historical cooperation between China and the U.S. in combating fascism, and the need to uphold the outcomes of that conflict [5] - Analysts argue that both nations should work together to maintain international order and avoid actions that could undermine their relationship [5]

Core Viewpoint - The statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi are seen as a violation of the post-World War II international legal framework, challenging international order and potentially escalating regional tensions, which should be firmly opposed by regional countries and the international community [1][3]. Group 1 - The remarks by Takaichi are deemed completely inappropriate and lacking legitimacy, serving only to provoke conflict and contribute to the ongoing deterioration of international order [3]. - There is a resurgence of discussions in Japan regarding "collective self-defense," which may lead to a breach of Japan's constitutional principle of pacifism, raising concerns about a revival of militarism in Japan [3]. - The statements are viewed as a betrayal of Japan's pacifist constitution and a violation of international law, posing a threat to international order and representing a distortion of historical facts [5]. Group 2 - The international community, including European countries, should remain vigilant against such statements, as they could ignite significant regional conflicts, akin to throwing a lit match into dry grass [5].

当地时间21日晚，数百名日本民众聚集在位于东京的首相官邸前，自发进行集会，要求日本首相高市早苗撤回涉台错误言论。 D @ a 201 总公 te @ 10-5 the first △集会现场 日本首相高市早苗近期发表的涉台错误言论，引发多方批评。高市早苗的涉台谬论是1945年日本战败以来，日本领导人首次在正式场合鼓吹所谓"台湾有事 就是日本有事"，并与行使集体自卫权相关联，首次在台湾问题上表达试图武装介入的野心。 0:00 △集会现场 日本有识之士表示，高市早苗的错误言论严重损害日中关系，给日本经济界带来巨大冲击。 � a △集会现场 英国 T 国际人士表示，日本首相高市早苗错误言论是想要挑战当今国际秩序，为日本的军国主义、扩张主义招魂，危及亚太地区的和平与安全。（总台记者 刘耀 鸿 何欣蕾） 责编：张靖雯、张霓 ...

俄罗斯外交部21日发布了一段1945年日本投降的视频，并配文"我们正密切关注日本近期在国防领 域的动作"，"如果东京想避免重蹈1945年的覆辙，就应该吸取历史教训，依靠本国宪法中仍然有效的和 平条款"。 法国德尔嘉出版社创始人蒙维尔：日本首相高市早苗的言论极其危险，违背了一个中国原则的国际 共识，违反联大第2758号决议和国际法，破坏战后秩序，威胁地区和平。在我看来，高市早苗的言论在 某种程度上是想要复活日本军国主义和扩张主义。 韩国祖国革新党国会议员金俊亨：高市的言论是出于日本国内政治所需，这样具有煽动性的言论很 不恰当。各国与中国建交的基础是支持一个中国原则。 央广网北京11月22日消息 据中央广播电视总台中国之声《新闻和报纸摘要》报道，国际人士表 示，日本首相高市早苗错误言论是想要挑战当今国际秩序，危及亚太地区的和平与安全。 国际人权与社会发展协会顾问洛佩斯：高市这一举动非常危险，违背了联合国宪章。此举既危害地 区稳定，也不符合日本民众的利益。 数百名日本民众21日晚在位于东京的首相官邸前举行集会，抗议高市早苗近日在国会发表的涉台错 误言论，要求其撤回相关表态并作出解释和道歉。多名抗议者要求高市对其涉台 ...

日本首相高市早苗近期发表的涉台错误言论，引发多方批评。国际人士表示，日本首相高市早苗错误言论是想要挑战当今国际秩序，为日本的军国主义、扩 张主义招魂，危及亚太地区的和平与安全。 智利国际问题专家 帕布洛·霍夫雷：高市言论极不负责任，只会激化冲突，这实际上可能助长日本的军国主义抬头。 国际人士表示，高市早苗的错误言论是对中国内政的粗暴干涉，国际社会不会接受。日本必须停止这一做法，否则将自受其害。 秘鲁利马大学法学院国际事务教授 古斯塔沃·阿雷瓦洛：高市早苗的错误言论危及亚太地区的和平与安全。日本经济界也反对她的言论，因为显然这会导致 中日两国经贸关系紧张，而在这种情况下，损失更大的一方其实是日本，而非中国。 法国德尔嘉出版社创始人 艾默里克·蒙维尔：现在我们在谈论的是什么，我们谈论的是建立在世界反法西斯战争胜利基础上的国际秩序。日本首相的错误言 论在某种程度上是想要挑战当今国际秩序，想要为日本的军国主义、扩张主义招魂。 ...

习近平总书记指出："国际力量对比正在深刻演变，但全球治理体系改革长期滞后。我们要践行真正的 多边主义，坚持共商共建共享的全球治理观，以公平正义、开放包容为理念引领全球治理改革。"当今 世界，全球性挑战日益增多，加强全球治理、推动全球治理体系改革成为大势所趋。习近平总书记站在 全人类共同利益高度，在"上海合作组织+"会议上郑重提出全球治理倡议，明确回答了"构建什么样的全 球治理体系、如何改革完善全球治理"的时代课题，为国际社会合作解决全球性问题领航定向，为推动 人类进步事业注入新的强劲动力。 党的二十届四中全会通过的《中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十五个五年规划的建议》提 出："落实全球发展倡议、全球安全倡议、全球文明倡议、全球治理倡议，引领国际秩序朝着更加公正 合理的方向发展。"我们要深入学习习近平外交思想丰富发展的最新成果，深入学习贯彻党的二十届四 中全会精神，全面领会全球治理倡议的丰富内涵、重大意义、深远影响，积极参与引领全球治理体系改 革和建设，同各国一道推动构建人类命运共同体。 全球治理倡议为改革完善全球治理提供了时代方案 习近平总书记立足加速演进的世界百年未有之大变局，准确把握人类发展进步的大 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses China's strong diplomatic and military response to Japan's provocative statements regarding Taiwan, emphasizing that China is prepared for substantial countermeasures if Japan continues its aggressive stance [6][14][22]. Group 1: Diplomatic Actions - On November 14, China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned the Japanese ambassador to express serious concerns over Japan's military threats [3][7]. - The term "奉示" (instruction) was used for the first time in Sino-Japanese diplomatic exchanges, indicating a higher level of seriousness in China's response [7][9]. - China's diplomatic stance has escalated from urging Japan to stop interfering in China's internal affairs to stating that "all consequences must be borne by Japan" [6][16]. Group 2: Military Implications - The phrase "迎头痛击" (counterattack) was used in a diplomatic context for the first time, suggesting a readiness for military action if provoked [16][19]. - Experts indicate that China's potential countermeasures could include economic sanctions and a halt to governmental exchanges with Japan, given that China is Japan's largest trading partner [18][19]. - The article highlights Japan's military rhetoric and actions, suggesting a revival of militaristic tendencies that could threaten regional stability [20][24]. Group 3: Historical Context - The article notes that this year marks the 80th anniversary of China's victory in the Anti-Japanese War, framing Japan's recent actions as a challenge to the post-World War II international order [21][22]. - Japan's behavior is characterized as a violation of international law and a threat to peace in East Asia, with calls for Japan to reflect on its historical actions [22][24]. - The article suggests that Japan's current leadership is facing criticism not only from China but also from other neighboring countries like Russia and South Korea [23][24].

Core Points - The Dutch government's forced acquisition of a semiconductor company has sparked widespread controversy, with European nations remaining silent on this apparent violation of market rules [1][2] - The incident highlights the hypocrisy of Western nations that claim to uphold a "rules-based order" while prioritizing their own industrial interests, undermining the international investment environment and the concept of fair competition [2][4] - The justification of "national security" for the takeover raises questions about the true motives behind the Dutch government's actions, with discussions in European media focusing more on the company's technology impact on the automotive industry rather than the legality of the government's behavior [5] Group 1 - The forced acquisition by the Dutch government has been criticized for undermining market rules and international governance principles [1][2] - The silence from other European countries indicates a double standard in their commitment to fair competition when it comes to non-Western enterprises [2][5] - The incident serves as a reminder that the so-called "order" and "justice" espoused by some Western nations often serve their strategic interests, revealing a pragmatic approach to rules [4] Group 2 - The focus of public discourse on the semiconductor company's technology rather than the legality of the acquisition reflects a selective disregard for principles in favor of national interests [5] - The situation illustrates the potential erosion of international credibility for Western nations as their actions reveal the true nature of power politics [4]

Core Viewpoint - The unexpected phone call from Putin during a White House summit shifted the focus from the Ukraine situation, revealing a potential high-level strategic coordination between the US and Russia, which undermines the post-World War II multilateral international order [4][12][16] Group 1: US-Russia Relations - Trump's aggressive stance towards Ukraine, including pressuring Zelensky to accept Russia's ceasefire framework, indicates a significant policy reversal [4][6] - The meeting atmosphere was tense, with Trump dismissing traditional diplomatic decorum and emphasizing Russia's strong economic performance following a lengthy conversation with Putin [6][8] - The proposed ceasefire terms from Russia involve Ukraine relinquishing control of the Donbas region, which reflects a unilateral imposition of humiliating conditions on Ukraine [6][10] Group 2: Ukraine's Position - Zelensky entered the summit with hopes for military support, particularly the provision of Tomahawk missiles, but left disappointed as Trump retracted previous commitments [7][8] - The pressure from Trump to consider Russia's conditions places Ukraine in a politically precarious situation, facing the prospect of compromising with an aggressor [8][12] Group 3: European Allies' Response - European leaders are aware of the deteriorating situation but are adopting a pragmatic approach, initiating secret emergency plans due to deep-seated security anxieties [12][13] - The coordination between the US and Russia is eroding trust within NATO, prompting discussions among European leaders about establishing an independent security framework [12][14] Group 4: Implications for China - The shifting geopolitical landscape poses unprecedented risks for China's energy and raw material transportation, as it is a key player in global supply chains [12][13] - Potential agreements between the US and Russia could lead to a bifurcated international energy market, impacting China's energy import stability and transportation security [13][14] - China is proactively diversifying its energy imports and enhancing its strategic reserves to mitigate risks from potential geopolitical conflicts [13][14]