吴孙沛璟 马杜罗在执法人员陪同下前往联邦法院 新华社 发 旧金山民众举行 示威，抗议美国对委内瑞拉发动袭击 美军3日凌晨对委内瑞拉发动大规模军事打击，强行控制马杜罗总统夫妇并带往美国。这一事件导致委 内瑞拉国内政治与安全局势动荡，引发国际社会的高度关注。 委内瑞拉局势未来走向如何？我们请专家详细解读。——编者 吴孙沛璟 美国对委内瑞拉采取如此极端行动，看似颇具特朗普政府标志性的强硬和戏剧化风格，但背后却反映出 多重战略考量及动因。 首先，自然资源是核心驱动力。委内瑞拉拥有全球最大的探明石油储量，其石油资源不仅是委内瑞拉经 济的生命线，也是国际能源市场的重要组成部分。近年来，委内瑞拉与中国、俄罗斯等国深化能源合 作，试图逐步摆脱美国制裁和经济封锁的压力。此次事件发生后，特朗普明确表示将派遣美国大型石油 公司进入委内瑞拉，将投入10亿美元以修复委国内的石油基础设施，并为美国带来收益。在全球能源格 局动荡与大国竞争加剧的背景下，美国发起军事干预，旨在掌握对委内瑞拉石油资源的控制权。 其次，内部政治动因不容忽视。2026年美国中期选举临近，特朗普政府面临支持率下滑的压力。通过在 海外展现强硬形象，尤其是在拉美这一传统 ...

（来源：今晚报） 【#美国惦记格陵兰岛却甩锅中国#】曾多次表达对丹麦的格陵兰岛"志在必得"的特朗普，最近又表 示"美国需要格陵兰岛"，为此还给出了个荒唐的理由，称是因为格陵兰岛"到处都是中国船只"。当今时 代，国家主权与领土完整，是严肃的国际政治话题，是每一个国家不容侵犯的核心利益，这也是基本的 国际共识。作为世界第一大岛，格陵兰岛拥有高度自治权，国防和外交事务由丹麦政府掌管。美国天天 以"国际警察"自居，张口闭口捍卫"基于规则的国际秩序"，却视他国主权如无物，肆无忌惮的霸权主义 心态，足见美式"双标"之傲慢。更为可笑的是，明明自己对他国领土垂涎三尺，却倒打一耙，生硬 地"甩锅"中国。殊不知，山姆大叔早已劣迹斑斑，如今"碰瓷"，除了暴露其内心的惶恐外，糊弄不了任 何人。这也再一次说明，单极世界已经被扔进了历史的垃圾堆，美国对霸权根基加速垮塌的现实心知肚 明，因此只能依靠拙劣的谎言好让自己"师出有名"。特朗普"觊觎格陵兰"的戏码已经演了一年多，世界 根本看不到"美国再次伟大"的任何征兆。天下苦美式霸权久矣，眼见霸主难看的吃相，是割肉滑跪，还 是捍卫主权，更多国家正在给出自己的答案。（北京日报）#委内瑞拉代总统致 ...

"今天是委内瑞拉，明天就可能是任何一个国家。"智利总统博里奇这句话可谓一针见血，一语道破国际 社会的普遍忧虑。当美国撕掉"规则秩序"的虚伪面具，当丛林法则取代国际准则，没有任何一个主权国 家是安全的。 正如英国《卫报》所指出的，这一操作与伊拉克战争如出一辙，延续了美国通过武力颠覆他国政权、攫 取自然资源的一贯套路。从罗织罪名到军事打击，从政权颠覆到资本瓜分，美国这套完整的"现代海盗 逻辑"，完全无视国家主权平等和禁止使用武力的国际法基本原则，将世界拉回了弱肉强食的野蛮殖民 时代。 追溯历史，美国抱持"门罗主义"将拉美视为自家"后院"，两百多年来不断通过策动政变、武装入侵、经 济制裁等手段干涉拉美内政，从墨西哥到巴拿马，从智利到海地，无数拉美国家沦为其霸权野心的牺牲 品。此次对委内瑞拉的行动，不过是美国干涉主义的最新篇章。 事实上，美国口中的"基于规则的国际秩序"，从来都不是什么普世正义的灯塔，而是服务于美国利益 的"掠夺秩序"。当规则符合其利益时，美国便拿规则当武器指责他国；当规则阻碍其掠夺时，美国便毫 不犹豫地撕碎规则，动用武力强行开路。此次对委内瑞拉的军事行动，再次让世界看清了这一本质。 当丛林法则取代国 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article critiques the "double standards" in U.S. trade and technology policies, highlighting a pattern of behavior where the U.S. imposes restrictions on others while exempting itself from the same rules, particularly in sectors like high-end chips and electric vehicles [1][2][3]. Group 1: U.S. Trade and Technology Policies - The U.S. employs a "winner never violates the rules" logic, demanding resources from others while suppressing their strengths [1][2]. - The U.S. has implemented export controls on high-end chips and has generalized sanctions, forcing third-party companies to "choose sides," which disrupts global supply chains [2][3]. - The U.S. restricts market access for foreign companies in emerging technologies, citing "national security" and "fair trade," which contradicts WTO rules [3]. Group 2: Historical Context and Current Dynamics - Historically, the U.S. has suppressed emerging powers, using various justifications such as "dumping" and "national security" to protect its interests [4]. - The current landscape shows that the U.S. is no longer the unchallenged leader, facing significant pushback in sectors like high-end chips and electric vehicles, with domestic companies and consumers suffering from government policies [4][5]. - The article suggests that true strength does not rely on underhanded tactics, and the U.S. must abandon its outdated "exceptionalism" mindset to compete effectively in the 21st century [5].

Group 1 - The sudden increase of tariffs on Indian goods exported to the US from 25% to 50% poses a significant threat to India's economy, particularly affecting textiles and agricultural products, which have strong alternatives in countries like Vietnam and Bangladesh [1][5] - The delay of the US delegation's visit to India has prompted a strategic pivot from India towards China, with potential breakthroughs in cooperation being sought, especially regarding border issues [3][7] - Indian business leaders are actively pursuing partnerships with Chinese companies in the renewable energy sector, recognizing China's technological advantages and the growing market demand in India [5][7] Group 2 - The shift in focus towards China is not an isolated case but part of a broader trend among emerging markets seeking alternatives to US partnerships, as countries like Brazil and South Africa also adjust their strategies [9][11] - The collaboration between India and China in the renewable energy sector is seen as a way to overcome the challenges posed by US tariffs, with Indian experts advocating for trade to drive development rather than being a political byproduct [7][11] - The ongoing trade tensions and tariffs imposed by the US are accelerating the formation of a multipolar world, as countries increasingly seek to diversify their economic partnerships away from US dominance [9][11]

Core Viewpoint - The report highlights the deteriorating human rights situation in the United States, emphasizing systemic issues such as economic inequality, racial discrimination, and the plight of vulnerable groups, particularly in the context of the 2024 political climate [1][2][3]. Group 1: Economic Inequality - The report indicates that over 40 million Americans live in poverty, with more than 700,000 homeless and 13.5% of households facing food shortages [1][2]. - The wealth gap is stark, with the top 10% of households holding 67% of total wealth, while the bottom 50% possess only 2.5% [8]. - Inflation has severely impacted low-income families, leading to record credit card debt of $1.14 trillion by Q2 2024 [9][10]. Group 2: Racial Discrimination - Systemic racism is pervasive, with African Americans being three times more likely to be killed by police compared to whites [12]. - The report notes that 61% of children sentenced to life without parole are African American, highlighting racial disparities in the justice system [12]. - Environmental racism disproportionately affects minority communities, with 80% of waste incinerators located in areas predominantly inhabited by African Americans and Latinos [12]. Group 3: Vulnerable Groups - Women and children face significant rights violations, with the U.S. being the only country not to ratify the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women [15]. - Approximately 40% of working women have experienced sexual harassment, and domestic violence rates exceed 40% in 11 states [16][17]. - The report highlights that the U.S. has the highest infant mortality rate among developed countries, with significant racial disparities in health outcomes [15][16]. Group 4: Immigration Issues - The humanitarian crisis at the U.S. border continues to worsen, with rising deaths among undocumented immigrants, particularly in Texas where fatalities increased from 72 in 2022 to 168 in 2024 [2][18]. - Immigrants face torture and inhumane treatment in detention facilities, which have been described as "black jails" [2][18]. - Political rhetoric surrounding immigration has fueled societal divisions, with immigrants often scapegoated for broader social issues [18].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the rapid deterioration of Canada-U.S. relations due to a sudden imposition of a 35% tariff by the Trump administration, which has pushed Canada to seek closer ties with China [1][3][10] - The article emphasizes the economic impact on Canada, predicting a GDP decline of 4.2%, pushing the country towards recession [5] - The political reaction in Canada has been one of shock and anger, with officials expressing strong opposition to the U.S. tariffs, indicating a significant shift in sentiment [6][10] Group 2 - The article discusses Canada's heavy reliance on exports, with 73.2% of its economy dependent on trade, making it vulnerable to U.S. actions [8] - A notable shift occurred when Canadian Foreign Minister Anand proposed to "recalibrate Canada-China relations," marking a significant diplomatic pivot [10][27] - The article contrasts the U.S. approach of threats with China's offer of opportunities, highlighting the growing trade relationship between Canada and China, projected to grow by 8.3% in 2024 [22][23] Group 3 - The article critiques the U.S. for its perceived double standards in trade, noting that the U.S. heavily relies on Canadian oil and electricity while accusing Canada of unfair trade practices [12][15] - It points out that Canada has been supplying oil to the U.S. at discounted rates, raising questions about the fairness of the U.S. position [12][19] - The article suggests that Canada’s pivot towards China could signal a broader trend among nations seeking to diversify their alliances away from the U.S. [29][32] Group 4 - The article concludes that the rapid collapse of a 73-year alliance in just 17 hours illustrates the importance of respect over intimidation in international relations [38] - It posits that Canada’s choice to seek new partnerships is not an act of betrayal but rather a sign of awakening to the need for mutual respect and cooperation [36][38] - The narrative suggests that this event may mark the beginning of a shift towards a multipolar world, where countries prioritize their own interests and seek diverse partnerships [34][36]