Core Viewpoint - Iran's permanent representative to the United Nations, Iravani, has communicated a strong warning regarding potential military aggression from the United States, asserting that Iran will respond decisively in accordance with its right to self-defense under the UN Charter [1][2] Group 1: Iran's Position and Response - Iran emphasizes its commitment to the principles of the UN Charter and expresses a constructive attitude towards negotiations with the U.S. regarding nuclear discussions [1] - The letter calls for immediate action from the UN Secretary-General and the Security Council to ensure the U.S. ceases its threats of military force, which Iran views as illegal [1][2] - Iran asserts that it does not seek tension or war but will respond proportionately if faced with military aggression, targeting all bases and assets of hostile forces in the region [2] Group 2: U.S. Military Threats - Reports indicate that President Trump is considering a "limited military strike" against Iran to compel compliance with U.S. demands regarding the nuclear agreement [2] - If authorized, initial U.S. attacks could occur within days, with potential escalation if Iran does not halt its uranium enrichment activities [2]

Core Viewpoint - Iran accuses the U.S. of violating the UN Charter through threats of military action and calls for the UN Security Council to take immediate action against these threats [1][2]. Group 1 - Iran's letter to the UN Security Council highlights U.S. President Trump's statement regarding potential military action against Iran if no agreement is reached, which Iran views as a public threat of force [1]. - The letter emphasizes the already tense regional situation, warning that U.S. military deployments and aggressive rhetoric increase the risk of real military conflict, potentially leading to catastrophic consequences for regional and international peace and security [1]. - Iran asserts its commitment to resolving disputes through diplomatic means and calls for the complete lifting of unilateral sanctions imposed on it [1]. Group 2 - Iran urges the Security Council to fulfill its primary responsibility of maintaining international peace and security by demanding that the U.S. cease threats of military force and adhere to its obligations under the UN Charter [2]. - The letter states that if Iran suffers a military attack, it will exercise its right to self-defense as per Article 51 of the Charter, holding the U.S. fully responsible for the consequences [2]. - Iran clarifies that it does not seek escalation or war and will not initiate conflict, but will respond if subjected to military aggression, targeting all bases, facilities, and assets of hostile forces in the region [2].

Core Viewpoint - Iran accuses the U.S. President of violating the UN Charter through recent military action threats and urges the UN Security Council to take immediate action [1][4]. Group 1: Accusations and Responses - Iran's letter to the UN claims that President Trump's social media post on February 18 indicates potential military action against Iran if no agreement is reached, which Iran views as a public threat of force [3][6]. - The letter emphasizes that the current regional situation is already tense, and U.S. military deployments combined with aggressive rhetoric increase the risk of real military conflict, potentially leading to catastrophic consequences for regional and international peace and security [3][6]. Group 2: Diplomatic Stance - Iran asserts its commitment to resolving disputes through diplomatic means and states that it has participated sincerely in nuclear negotiations [3][6]. - The letter calls for the complete lifting of unilateral sanctions imposed on Iran and reaffirms Iran's inalienable rights to peacefully utilize nuclear energy as a signatory of the Non-Proliferation Treaty [3][6]. Group 3: Call to Action - Iran urges the Security Council to fulfill its primary responsibility of maintaining international peace and security by demanding the U.S. to cease threats of military action and adhere to its obligations under the UN Charter [3][6]. - The letter warns that if Iran is subjected to military attack, it will exercise its right to self-defense under Article 51 of the Charter, holding the U.S. fully responsible for the consequences [3][6]. - Iran states it does not seek escalation or war and will not initiate conflict, but will respond if faced with military aggression, targeting all bases, facilities, and assets of "hostile forces" in the region [3][6].

Core Viewpoint - The Portuguese government, represented by President De Sousa, emphasizes the importance of respecting international law and the United Nations Charter in response to the U.S. military intervention in Venezuela on January 3 [1] Group 1 - President De Sousa stated that the Portuguese government's position has always been clear regarding the necessity to respect international law and the UN Charter [1] - The U.S. military intervention in Venezuela raises questions about the validity of the UN Charter [1] - De Sousa also addressed issues related to Greenland, asserting that any intervention disregarding international law and the UN Charter will not be accepted or supported by Portugal [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Secretary-General of the United Nations, António Guterres, emphasized the need for global cooperation and adherence to the UN Charter to maintain peace and unity in the face of geopolitical divisions and violations of international law [1][2] Group 1 - Guterres highlighted that blatant violations of international law and significant cuts in development and humanitarian aid are undermining the foundation of global cooperation [1] - He stated that the actions of some are pushing international cooperation to the brink of collapse, testing the resilience of multilateralism [1] - The Secretary-General called for all member states to fulfill their financial obligations as per the UN Charter [2] Group 2 - The President of the 80th UN General Assembly, Csaba Kőrösi, outlined key priorities for the new year, including upholding the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and promoting the "UN 80th Anniversary Reform Initiative" [2] - The selection of the next UN Secretary-General is also a significant focus for the upcoming year [2]

Core Viewpoint - The independent human rights experts appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council expressed serious concerns regarding the statements made by the U.S. President about Greenland, emphasizing that any claims to seize or control territory under the guise of national security or economic interests reflect a colonial mindset that the international community has long rejected [1][2] Group 1 - The U.S. President's repeated questioning of Denmark's legitimate sovereignty over Greenland and the assertion that the U.S. needs to own and control Greenland are highlighted as violations of the United Nations Charter [1] - The experts warned that any threats or use of force to alter Greenland's political status or challenge another country's sovereignty clearly violate international law [2] - The pattern of U.S. military aggression, including attacks on sovereign nations and the use of extrajudicial killings, is noted as potentially causing irreversible damage to global order [1] Group 2 - The rights of the people of Greenland to fully and freely exercise their right to self-determination are emphasized as a core principle of the United Nations [1] - Any unilateral attempts to change Greenland's territorial or constitutional status are stated to not only violate international law but also threaten stability in the Arctic and broader regions [2] - The U.S. is urged to reaffirm its commitment to the United Nations Charter and to resolve international disputes peacefully while respecting the sovereignty of nations and the self-determination rights of all peoples [2]

Core Viewpoint - The global governance initiative proposed by President Xi Jinping aims to establish a fair, reasonable, and inclusive multilateral framework, contributing to world peace, stability, and prosperity [1][2] Group 1: Global Governance Initiative - The initiative promotes the democratization of international relations and calls for increased representation and voice for developing countries in UN institutions, reflecting the interests and demands of the majority [1] - The initiative aligns with the principles of the UN Charter, advocating for a multilateralism based on the equality of sovereign states, thereby enhancing stability and certainty in global governance [1] Group 2: China's Role in Global Governance - China has actively participated in global governance by proposing new ideas and initiatives, such as the concept of shared global governance, adherence to international law, and the practice of multilateralism [1] - The BRICS cooperation mechanism and the high-quality construction of the Belt and Road Initiative embody the principles of multilateralism, fostering cooperation consensus and injecting new momentum into regional development [2] Group 3: Critique of Unilateral Actions - There is a concern regarding certain countries attempting to undermine the UN system and imposing an irrational fear of China, which is seen as a threat to global peace and order [1] - The actions of the United States in Venezuela are viewed as an attack on the UN Charter, international law, and civilization, highlighting the need to respect national sovereignty and territorial integrity [1]

Core Viewpoint - The unilateral military actions by the United States against Venezuela pose a significant threat to the integrity of the United Nations Charter, emphasizing the urgent need for dialogue and diplomatic solutions to disputes [1] Group 1 - South Africa's International Relations and Cooperation Minister, Naledi Pandor, asserts that the current situation necessitates unprecedented importance and urgency for countries to resolve conflicts through dialogue and diplomacy [1] - Pandor emphasizes the rejection of the notion that "might makes right," stating that the rule of law is fundamental to maintaining global stability, legitimacy, and governance [1] - South Africa is committed to upholding multilateralism centered around the United Nations, urging the international community to work together to ensure stability and peace prevail [1]

Core Viewpoint - The unilateral military actions by the United States against Venezuela pose a significant threat to the integrity of the United Nations Charter, according to South Africa's Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, Naledi Pandor [1] Group 1: Military Actions and International Law - The U.S. military strikes against Venezuela and the abduction of the Maduro couple for trial in the U.S. are highlighted as actions that jeopardize the UN Charter [1] - The current geopolitical situation underscores the urgent need for countries to resolve disputes through dialogue and diplomacy [1] Group 2: Advocacy for Multilateralism - South Africa is committed to upholding multilateralism centered around the United Nations [1] - The international community is urged to work together to ensure stability and peace remain the primary focus [1]

Group 1 - The UN Security Council held an emergency public meeting regarding the US military action against Venezuela, with representatives from Russia, Colombia, Brazil, Chile, and Cuba condemning the action [2] - Most participating countries emphasized the necessity for the international community to adhere to international law, including the UN Charter [2] - UN Secretary-General Guterres expressed deep concern over the US action, stating it failed to respect international law and the UN Charter, which prohibits the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state [2] Group 2 - The overall direction for gold remains bullish, with key resistance levels identified at 4500-4520, and a strong breakout could lead to targets around 4600 [2] - A slight pullback was observed in early trading, viewed as a technical correction following an initial surge, indicating a consolidation phase [2] - Support levels are noted at 4430-4420, with a breakdown potentially leading to high-level fluctuations, while attention is also on the 4400-4380 range for support [2]