Workflow
《中国共产党纪律处分条例》
icon
Search documents
明纪释法丨严禁接受、提供可能影响公正执行公务的活动安排
习近平总书记强调,"守住拒腐防变防线,要从小事小节上守起。小洞不补,大洞吃苦。一个人蜕化变 质往往是从吃喝玩乐起步的。"接受、提供可能影响公正执行公务的宴请或者旅游、健身、娱乐等活动 安排,既助长享乐奢靡之风,又容易滋生腐败,严重破坏党风政风和社会风气,损害党和政府的形象。 对此,必须紧盯不放、寸步不让,对享乐奢靡歪风露头就打,对隐形变异新动向时刻防范,对顶风违纪 行为从严查处,决不允许死灰复燃,决不允许旧弊未除、新弊又生。《中国共产党纪律处分条例》第一 百零一条对接受、提供可能影响公正执行公务的活动安排行为及其适用的处分种类和幅度作出了规定。 《中国共产党纪律处分条例》 第一百零一条 接受、提供可能影响公正执行公务的宴请或者旅游、健身、娱乐等活动安排,情节较重 的,给予警告或者严重警告处分;情节严重的,给予撤销党内职务或者留党察看处分。 立纪沿革 2003年《中国共产党纪律处分条例》(以下简称《条例》)第八十条规定,"接受可能影响公正执行公 务的宴请,情节较重的,给予警告或者严重警告处分;情节严重的,给予撤销党内职务或者留党察看处 分"。2015年修订《条例》时,将2010年《中国共产党党员领导干部廉洁从政 ...
明纪释法丨准确认定违规公款消费和送礼行为
习近平总书记指出,"作风问题有的看起来不大,几顿饭,几杯酒,几张卡,但都与公私问题有联系, 都与公款、公权有关系。公款姓公,一分一厘都不能乱花;公权为民,一丝一毫都不能私用。领导干部 必须时刻清楚这一点,做到公私分明、克己奉公、严格自律。"党的十八大以来,纠治违规公款消费、 送礼问题取得显著成效,但也要清醒看到,该问题在一些地方或单位仍不同程度存在,且存在隐形变异 的现象。这些行为严重违反财经制度,侵害和浪费国家财产,败坏党风政风、带坏社会风气。《中国共 产党纪律处分条例》(以下简称《条例》)第一百一十三条,对违规组织、参加公款消费或者违规公款 购买赠送、发放礼品等行为及其适用的处分种类和幅度作出了规定。 《中国共产党纪律处分条例》 第一百一十三条 违反有关规定组织、参加用公款支付的宴请、娱乐、健身活动,或者用公款购买赠送 或者发放礼品、消费卡(券)等,对直接责任者和领导责任者,情节较轻的,给予警告或者严重警告处 分;情节较重的,给予撤销党内职务或者留党察看处分;情节严重的,给予开除党籍处分。 【立纪沿革】 党中央历来强调不得违规进行公款消费。2003年《条例》将"违反规定参与用公款支付的高消费娱乐、 健身活 ...
违规吃喝案件中党纪条款适用研究
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the violation of the Central Eight Regulations regarding improper dining practices, specifically focusing on a case involving public funds being used for a banquet that could influence the impartial execution of duties [1][2]. Group 1: Violation of Regulations - The case involves Sun, the Party Secretary and Chairman of a state-owned enterprise, who invited a deputy mayor and others to a banquet under the pretense of personal expense, while actually using public funds [1][2]. - Two opinions exist regarding the classification of Sun's actions: one suggests he violated multiple articles of the regulations, while the other argues for a more lenient interpretation [2][3]. Group 2: Handling of Involved Parties - The first opinion states that both Sun and Zhang, the vice president who paid for the meal, should face the same disciplinary actions for their joint violation of the regulations [2]. - The second opinion suggests that Sun's actions should only be classified under one article, with Zhang receiving a lighter penalty due to his subordinate role [3][4]. Group 3: Disciplinary Actions - Sun and Zhang's actions are classified under the regulations for organizing a banquet with public funds, which is a serious violation, leading to a recommendation for severe penalties [3][4]. - The deputy mayor and accompanying personnel, unaware of the misuse of public funds, should not be penalized as severely, but their acceptance of the banquet still constitutes a violation of the regulations [4][5]. - Ultimately, Sun received a serious warning, while Zhang and the deputy mayor faced varying degrees of penalties based on their involvement [5].