1月11日晚，反腐专题片《一步不停歇半步不退让》第一集播出。 其中剖析了河南省信阳市、罗山县10名干部在学习教育期间违规吃喝严重违反中央八项规定精神问题。 以下为部分实录： 2025年3月，党中央部署开展深入贯彻中央八项规定精神学习教育，再次向全党宣示作风建设永远在路上，表明一锤接着一锤敲、一抓到底的坚定决心。 制定实施中央八项规定是我们党在新时代的徙木立信之举，中央八项规定是必须长期坚守的铁规矩、硬杠杠。党中央响鼓重锤、三令五申，但仍有一些党 员干部政治意识极其淡薄，对党中央推进全面从严治党坚定决心和意志的认识极不清醒，对党的纪律和规矩毫无敬畏戒惧之心。2025年3月发生的河南省 信阳市、罗山县10名干部在学习教育期间违规吃喝严重违反中央八项规定精神问题，就是一起典型案例。 河南省信阳市罗山县委原常委、政法委原书记李献林：自己的底线没守住，带来一圈的事，害了一圈的人。所以这也是我这段时间一直在忏悔的原因。 河南省信阳市罗山县检察院原党组书记、检察长段巍巍：当时知道自己付出这么沉重的代价，肯定是不会去，但是现在没有办法去挽回这个事情。 这场让参加者们如今都懊悔不已的饭局，代价确实沉重。参加饭局的10人中，有1 ...

来源： 中央纪委国家监委网站、央视新闻 1月11日晚，反腐专题片《一步不停歇 半步不退让》第一集播出。 其中剖析了 河南省信阳市、罗山县10名干部在学习教育期间违规吃喝严重违反中央八项规定 精神问题 。 以下为部分实录： 2025年3月，党中央部署开展深入贯彻中央八项规定精神学习教育，再次向全党宣示作风建 设永远在路上，表明一锤接着一锤敲、一抓到底的坚定决心。制定实施中央八项规定是我们 党在新时代的徙木立信之举，中央八项规定是必须长期坚守的铁规矩、硬杠杠。党中央响鼓 重锤、三令五申，但仍有一些党员干部政治意识极其淡薄，对党中央推进全面从严治党坚定 决心和意志的认识极不清醒，对党的纪律和规矩毫无敬畏戒惧之心。2025年3月发生的河南 省信阳市、罗山县10名干部在学习教育期间违规吃喝严重违反中央八项规定精神问题，就是 一起典型案例。 河南省 信阳市罗山县委原常委、政法委原书记 李献林 ： 自己的底线没守住，带来一圈的 事，害了一圈的人。所以这也是我这段时间一直在忏悔的原因。 河南省 信阳市罗山县检察院 原 党组书记、检察长 段巍巍 ： 当时知道自己付出这么沉重的 代价，肯定是不会去，但是现在没有办法去挽回这个事情 ...

#党员干部酒瘾太大早晚喝趴下#【#酒桌不正之风是滋生腐败的温床#】1月11日晚，由中央纪委国家监 委宣传部与中央广播电视总台央视联合摄制的年度正风反腐大片播出，今年的主题是《一步不停歇 半 步不退让》。第一集《纠风治乱为民》中，领导干部参与违规吃喝甚至喝酒致人死亡的案例，暴露了一 些党员干部"酒瘾"仍然很大。党的十八大以来，在正风反腐长期保持高压态势、执纪越来越严的当下， 公款公然大吃大喝的风气近乎销声匿迹，但私底下、会所里推杯换盏、觥筹交错的现象并未完全绝迹。 有的是跟商人一起，就着"一毛五"的香味，在别有用心地恭维中，达成了某种彼此心知肚明的默契；有 的是跟"自己人"一起，上下级、老同学、老朋友，在感情的催化下，加深了小圈子的关系。加入酒局的 党员干部，则往往用"影响发展论""行业特殊论"等为自己辩护，以"小事小节论""抹不开面子"为自己开 脱。专题片上出镜的这些官员，真是在乎那口酒吗？当然不是，他们在乎的是那种前呼后拥的庸俗优越 感、被圈子所接纳的低级认同感，更是其背后能攫取的巨大物质利益和可观的政治收益。出于自身利益 的算计，商人们坐在了一起，一口一壶地喝并非出于对领导干部的敬意，再干一杯也只是出于表 ...

转自：北京日报客户端 1月11日晚，由中央纪委国家监委宣传部与中央广播电视总台央视联合摄制的年度正风反腐大片播出， 今年的主题是《一步不停歇 半步不退让》。第一集《纠风治乱为民》中，领导干部参与违规吃喝甚至 喝酒致人死亡的案例，暴露了一些党员干部"酒瘾"仍然很大。 党的十八大以来，在正风反腐长期保持高压态势、执纪越来越严的当下，公款公然大吃大喝的风气近乎 销声匿迹，但私底下、会所里推杯换盏、觥筹交错的现象并未完全绝迹。有的是跟商人一起，就着"一 毛五"的香味，在别有用心地恭维中，达成了某种彼此心知肚明的默契；有的是跟"自己人"一起，上下 级、老同学、老朋友，在感情的催化下，加深了小圈子的关系。加入酒局的党员干部，则往往用"影响 发展论""行业特殊论"等为自己辩护，以"小事小节论""抹不开面子"为自己开脱。 专题片上出镜的这些官员，真是在乎那口酒吗？当然不是，他们在乎的是那种前呼后拥的庸俗优越感、 被圈子所接纳的低级认同感，更是其背后能攫取的巨大物质利益和可观的政治收益。出于自身利益的算 计，商人们坐在了一起，一口一壶地喝并非出于对领导干部的敬意，再干一杯也只是出于表态的逢场作 戏。"酒杯一端，政策放宽""酒品 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the violation of the Central Eight Regulations regarding improper dining practices, specifically focusing on a case involving public funds being used for a banquet that could influence the impartial execution of duties [1][2]. Group 1: Violation of Regulations - The case involves Sun, the Party Secretary and Chairman of a state-owned enterprise, who invited a deputy mayor and others to a banquet under the pretense of personal expense, while actually using public funds [1][2]. - Two opinions exist regarding the classification of Sun's actions: one suggests he violated multiple articles of the regulations, while the other argues for a more lenient interpretation [2][3]. Group 2: Handling of Involved Parties - The first opinion states that both Sun and Zhang, the vice president who paid for the meal, should face the same disciplinary actions for their joint violation of the regulations [2]. - The second opinion suggests that Sun's actions should only be classified under one article, with Zhang receiving a lighter penalty due to his subordinate role [3][4]. Group 3: Disciplinary Actions - Sun and Zhang's actions are classified under the regulations for organizing a banquet with public funds, which is a serious violation, leading to a recommendation for severe penalties [3][4]. - The deputy mayor and accompanying personnel, unaware of the misuse of public funds, should not be penalized as severely, but their acceptance of the banquet still constitutes a violation of the regulations [4][5]. - Ultimately, Sun received a serious warning, while Zhang and the deputy mayor faced varying degrees of penalties based on their involvement [5].

Group 1 - The article highlights the serious violations of discipline by public officials regarding improper dining and drinking practices, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the Central Eight Regulations [1][2][3] - Four specific cases of misconduct are detailed, involving officials from various departments who engaged in activities such as accepting gifts, organizing unauthorized banquets, and misusing public funds for personal expenses [1][2] - The article stresses the need for continuous efforts in maintaining discipline and improving the conduct of party members and public officials to uphold the party's image and integrity [3][4] Group 2 - The cases include individuals like Zou Jin, who was expelled from the party for accepting gifts and hosting private dinners funded by private enterprises [1] - Zheng Changxi mismanaged public funds by creating a "small treasury" for unauthorized dining expenses during official duties [2] - Zhang Yuanli and Jiang Ruixian were also implicated in similar violations, with Zhang accepting entertainment from private entities and Jiang misappropriating public funds for personal dining [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of strict adherence to regulations regarding misconduct, particularly in the context of public officials accepting gifts or benefits, highlighting the need for accountability and integrity in governance [1][2]. Group 1: Misconduct and Accountability - The article discusses the harmful effects of misconduct, particularly in the context of public officials accepting gifts, and stresses that even retired officials should face disciplinary actions if they engage in such behavior [1]. - A case involving a public hospital's vice president accepting "red envelopes" from medical equipment suppliers is examined, with the focus on whether this constitutes bribery or merely a gift [2]. - The article illustrates the necessity of thorough investigations to determine the nature of relationships between officials and suppliers, emphasizing that the absence of explicit profit motives does not absolve officials from accountability [2]. Group 2: Decision-Making and Responsibility - The article presents a case where two officials were held accountable for purchasing faulty gas alarm systems, despite their claims of ignorance regarding the technical specifications [3][4]. - It highlights the importance of understanding the technical aspects of procurement and the implications of decisions made by officials, suggesting that accountability should be balanced with the context of their actions [5]. - The article concludes with a discussion on the need for careful consideration in disciplinary actions, advocating for a nuanced approach that recognizes the complexities of decision-making in public service [6].

Group 1 - The article highlights multiple violations of the Central Eight Regulations by various officials in Qinghai Province, including instances of organizing banquets and accepting gifts during training sessions [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] - Specific cases include the actions of officials such as Chi Bai and Zhang Guanlin, who organized gatherings that led to disciplinary actions against them [1][2] - The report emphasizes the need for stricter enforcement of regulations and accountability among officials to combat corruption and maintain discipline within the party [8][9] Group 2 - The article details the disciplinary actions taken against several officials, including the expulsion from the party and public office for Zhang Kunming due to multiple violations [2] - Other officials, such as Yu Long and Ma Wenhui, received varying degrees of punishment, including two years of party observation and demotion [4][8] - The report indicates a persistent issue with officials engaging in corrupt practices despite ongoing anti-corruption efforts, highlighting a lack of awareness and adherence to regulations [8][9]

Group 1 - The establishment of the Supreme Prosecutor's Office's Investigation Department aims to enhance the crackdown on judicial corruption and uphold judicial fairness [1] - The Investigation Department will handle cases involving illegal detention, torture, illegal searches, and other crimes committed by judicial staff using their power, as well as major crimes committed by state officials under police jurisdiction [1] - Currently, 28 provincial-level procuratorates and some municipal procuratorates have set up specialized investigation institutions [1] Group 2 - The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection has issued a warning regarding violations of the Eight Provisions, particularly concerning improper dining by party members [2] - Violations include accepting or providing banquets that may influence the impartial execution of duties, and participating in public-funded banquets [3][4] - Key factors in determining violations include the relationships of participants, the nature of the dining location, and the source of funds [5][6][7]

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the Supreme Prosecutor's Office's Criminal Investigation Department aims to enhance the fight against judicial corruption and uphold judicial fairness, with 28 provincial-level procuratorates having already set up similar investigative bodies [2]. Group 1: Establishment and Responsibilities - The Criminal Investigation Department is responsible for investigating crimes committed by judicial staff using their authority, such as illegal detention and torture, as well as major crimes by state officials that require direct handling by the Supreme Prosecutor's Office [2]. - The establishment of this department is part of a broader initiative to strengthen the accountability of judicial personnel and ensure the protection of citizens' rights [2]. Group 2: Violations of Central Regulations - Recent reports highlight violations of the Central Eight Regulations, particularly concerning improper dining practices among party members, serving as a warning against such behaviors [3]. - Violations include accepting or providing meals that could influence the impartial execution of duties, attending private clubs, and using public funds for personal dining [4][5]. Group 3: Key Factors in Determining Violations - The determination of violations hinges on three key factors: the relationships of the participants, the nature of the dining location, and the source of the funds used for the meals [6]. - Specific guidelines indicate that dining with subordinates or service objects, regardless of the context, is considered a violation [7]. Group 4: Prohibited Dining Scenarios - Eight specific scenarios are outlined where participation in meals is prohibited, including public-funded dining, accepting invitations from enterprises, and attending lavish personal celebrations [12][19]. - The guidelines emphasize the importance of maintaining integrity and avoiding any situations that could compromise the execution of public duties [16][18].