Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Guo Jia Kun, emphasized that Taiwan's return to China is a significant outcome of World War II and an essential part of the post-war international order, supported by various international legal documents [1][2]. Group 1 - The status of Taiwan was resolved in 1945 with the victory of the Chinese people in the Anti-Japanese War, and the establishment of the People's Republic of China (PRC) on October 1, 1949, reaffirmed China's sovereignty over Taiwan [1]. - The PRC is recognized as the sole legitimate government of China, as stated in the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement, which Japan acknowledges and respects [1]. - Guo criticized the San Francisco Peace Treaty for being illegal and ineffective regarding Taiwan's sovereignty, as it was made without the participation of key WWII parties and violated international agreements [2]. Group 2 - Guo highlighted that the current Japanese Prime Minister's focus on the San Francisco Peace Treaty, while ignoring the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Proclamation, undermines the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations and challenges the post-war international order [2]. - The Chinese government urges Japan to reflect on its statements and take corrective actions to fulfill its obligations as a UN member state [2].

Core Points - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's remarks have faced widespread criticism domestically [1] - Professor Satoshi Fukasaku from Takushoku University described Takaichi's comments as reckless and an interference in the Taiwan issue, highlighting serious concerns [1] Summary by Category Political Implications - Takaichi's statements are seen as inappropriate given her position as the highest leader of the Self-Defense Forces, which raises questions about the rationale behind such remarks [1] - The sudden deviation from Japan's historically cautious stance on sensitive issues has left many perplexed [1] Legal Concerns - From an international law perspective, Takaichi's comments may violate the Japan-China Joint Communiqué, which outlines Japan's position on sensitive matters [1] - The remarks could also contravene the Japan-China Peace and Friendship Treaty, indicating significant legal implications [1] - The involvement in the Taiwan issue is viewed as a breach of bilateral agreements and political documents, leading to understandable criticism from China [1]