2025年12月8日，中共中央政治局委员、外交部长王毅在北京同德国外长瓦德富尔会谈时就台湾问题的 历史事实和法理经纬作了全面阐述。 1945年8月15日 日本战败,日本天皇承诺忠实履行 《波茨坦公告》各项规定并无条件投 降。10月25日,中国政府宣布恢复对 台湾行使主权,并在台北举行中国战 区台湾省受降仪式。 1949年 1945年7月 中美英共同签署、后来苏联参加的 《波茨坦公告》第八条规定,《开罗 宣言》之条件必将实施。 5 1971年 中华人民共和国中央人民政府取代中 华民国政府成为代表全中国的唯一合 法政府,自然对包括台湾在内的全部 领十行使主权。 第26届联大通过2758号决议,决定恢 复中华人民共和国在联合国的一切权 利,并立即将台湾当局的"代表"从 联合国驱逐出去。联合国的官方法律 意见确定, 台湾就是中国的一个省。 1972年 《中日联合声明》规定,日本国政府 承认中华人民共和国政府是代表全中 国的唯一合法政府,充分理解和尊重 中国政府关于台湾是中国领土不可分 割的一部分这一立场,承诺坚持遵循 《波茨坦公告》第八条的立场。 1978年 责任编辑：刘万里 SF014 2025年12月8日，中共中 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses Japan's ambiguous stance on Taiwan's legal status, referencing the San Francisco Peace Treaty and the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement as key documents [2][3] - It highlights China's assertion of sovereignty over Taiwan based on international legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration, which is considered a significant outcome of the anti-fascist war [3] - The article criticizes Japan for not addressing its historical responsibilities and for attempting to revise its pacifist constitution while increasing defense budgets, indicating a resurgence of militarism [3][4] Group 2 - The article emphasizes the importance of historical reflection and urges Japan to retract its erroneous statements and demonstrate its political commitments through actions [4]

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Guo Jia Kun, emphasized that Taiwan's return to China is a significant outcome of World War II and an essential part of the post-war international order, supported by various international legal documents [1][2]. Group 1 - The status of Taiwan was resolved in 1945 with the victory of the Chinese people in the Anti-Japanese War, and the establishment of the People's Republic of China (PRC) on October 1, 1949, reaffirmed China's sovereignty over Taiwan [1]. - The PRC is recognized as the sole legitimate government of China, as stated in the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement, which Japan acknowledges and respects [1]. - Guo criticized the San Francisco Peace Treaty for being illegal and ineffective regarding Taiwan's sovereignty, as it was made without the participation of key WWII parties and violated international agreements [2]. Group 2 - Guo highlighted that the current Japanese Prime Minister's focus on the San Francisco Peace Treaty, while ignoring the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Proclamation, undermines the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations and challenges the post-war international order [2]. - The Chinese government urges Japan to reflect on its statements and take corrective actions to fulfill its obligations as a UN member state [2].

Core Points - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's remarks have faced widespread criticism domestically [1] - Professor Satoshi Fukasaku from Takushoku University described Takaichi's comments as reckless and an interference in the Taiwan issue, highlighting serious concerns [1] Summary by Category Political Implications - Takaichi's statements are seen as inappropriate given her position as the highest leader of the Self-Defense Forces, which raises questions about the rationale behind such remarks [1] - The sudden deviation from Japan's historically cautious stance on sensitive issues has left many perplexed [1] Legal Concerns - From an international law perspective, Takaichi's comments may violate the Japan-China Joint Communiqué, which outlines Japan's position on sensitive matters [1] - The remarks could also contravene the Japan-China Peace and Friendship Treaty, indicating significant legal implications [1] - The involvement in the Taiwan issue is viewed as a breach of bilateral agreements and political documents, leading to understandable criticism from China [1]