Core Viewpoint - The recent controversy involving Huaxi Biological and brokerage reports highlights the need for improved interaction and accountability between listed companies and brokerage research teams, suggesting a potential shift in the dynamics of this relationship [6][8]. Group 1: Company Actions and Statements - Huaxi Biological issued a follow-up statement on May 21, further explaining its concerns regarding brokerage reports published on May 17, specifically addressing misleading conclusions about the medical aesthetics industry [4][5]. - The company pointed out that certain brokerage reports claimed that collagen products outperform hyaluronic acid without any supporting public data or scientific research [4][6]. - Huaxi Biological emphasized that its intention in naming the brokerages was not to attack them but to encourage a more informed and collaborative approach to industry analysis [5][6]. Group 2: Industry Implications - The incident has prompted discussions about redefining the interaction between listed companies and brokerage research, potentially leading to a more rigorous review process for research reports [8][9]. - Analysts suggest that this situation serves as a warning for brokerages to enhance the professionalism and accuracy of their reports, as previous instances of regulatory scrutiny have already highlighted issues within the industry [9][10]. - The ongoing scrutiny of brokerage reports may lead to a more cautious approach in the future, with an emphasis on compliance and thorough validation of research findings [10][11].